Lack of finances=lack of faith?

Is not having money or having little money a sign of weak faith or no faith?

  • No, money has no bearing on who you are as a Christian

  • No, the poorer actually have a deeper faith than the rich

  • Yes, weak faith.

  • If you are a real Christian you cannot be poor.


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.

SpiritPsalmist

Heavy lean toward Messianic
Site Supporter
Jun 13, 2002
21,665
1,466
70
Southeast Kansas
✟393,824.00
Country
United States
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Single
Originally posted by Blackhawk
Okay but then why would He need such an expensive garment?  He would not be wearing it for long. 

He had to wear clothes for at least 33 years. Yes?



I am sure they ate them later on.  My point was that they if they were rich they could of fed the people with the money they had but they instead had to borrow a kids lunch. 


From what I remember the disciples asked Him if they should go buy food.


Every need is promised to us.  What do we need though?  Do we need riches? no. Do we need the nice house and car? no.  Do we even need three meals a day? no.  We need very little compared to our wants but sometimes we call our wants needs.  I am not saying that having 3 meals a day, the house, the car or the riches are a bad thing but they are just not needs.  They are wants.  WE actually need very little and most of what we need is not material but relational. 

In this society, everyones needs are different.  They verry with what God has called each of us to.  Just because you may be able to survive on bread and water does not mean everyone else can.  Was'nt it Jesus who said, "man cannot live on bread alone"?
 
Upvote 0
Originally posted by Quaffer
Did'nt you read it?


Matthew 27
31 And after that they had mocked him, they took the robe off from him, and put his own raiment on him, and led him away to crucify him.

If you knew the OT you would know where Jesus quoted from.

I've read the whole Bible and I read the whole Bible.  The Bible is Christ's teaching. 

Like I said, Ask a question regarding your supposed contradiction. . .one of us will answer it.  :D

Alright my mistake. But this does not prove Jesus lived an expensive lifestyle. There all indications in the bible that Jesus lived a simple life including what he preached. Jesus could not have preached water and drank wine. The soldiers could also have wanted a piece of a famous person ("King of the Jews") clothes as a souvenir not because the clothes were expensive.

 

There are many contradictions one of them is what we are discussing here about wealth. I don't know why you are repeating the question. I said in the old testament the righteous were rewarded with material wealth which is an impediment to spirituality in the new testament. Once we are through with this discussion I will show you other contraditions.

But are you trying to say the Bible is error free?

 
 
Upvote 0
Originally posted by Quaffer
In this society, everyones needs are different.  They verry with what God has called each of us to.  Just because you may be able to survive on bread and water does not mean everyone else can.  Was'nt it Jesus who said, "man cannot live on bread alone"?

 

You forgot Jesus came to preach spirituality and not how to profit yourself in this world.
 
Upvote 0

Blackhawk

Monkey Boy
Feb 5, 2002
4,930
73
52
Ft. Worth, tx
Visit site
✟22,925.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
 

He had to wear clothes for at least 33 years. Yes? [/B]


Sure but He did not need an expensive garment.  To bring it to today we only need to get clothes from a thrift store or Kmart but we want to get them from Nordstroms or Neiman Marcus.  But my point in saying that was that everything that He owned was only transitory.  He used things for awhile and then did not need them any longer.  Just like us.  I have clothes that I wear but I only wear them for a ceratain amount of time then I get rid of them. 

From what I remember the disciples asked Him if they should go buy food. [/B]


John 6:5-9
5 Therefore Jesus, lifting up His eyes and seeing that a large crowd was coming to Him, said to Philip, "Where are we to buy bread, so that these may eat?"
6 This He was saying to test him, for He Himself knew what He was intending to do.
7 Philip answered Him, "Two hundred denarii worth of bread is not sufficient for them, for everyone to receive a little."
8 One of His disciples, Andrew, Simon Peter's brother, said to Him,
9 "There is a lad here who has five barley loaves and two fish, but what are these for so many people?"
(NAU)

Jesus asked if they should go out and buy them food to test His disciple's faith.  Phillip answered by saying that not even a ton of money that they clearly did not have would be able to buy them all even a little of food.  If it happened today Phillip might of said "Not even a miilion $ worth of food is sufficent" But the point clearly is that Phillip was saying to Jesus that eve nthis huge amount of money that we would never have is enough for all these people.  Jesus had other ideas on how He was going to feed them. 

Originally posted by Quaffer
In this society, everyones needs are different.  They verry with what God has called each of us to.  Just because you may be able to survive on bread and water does not mean everyone else can.  Was'nt it Jesus who said, "man cannot live on bread alone"?

No that is a cop out.  No one NEEDS to have a BMW.  No one needs to have a huge mansion.  no one needs to have more money than they can ever spend.  We only need a certain amount of food to survive.  Also you only quoted part of the scriptureabout living on "Bread alone." Let's read the rest of it. 


Matt 4:3-4
3 And the tempter came and said to Him, "If You are the Son of God, command that these stones become bread."
4 But He answered and said, "It is written, "MAN SHALL NOT LIVE ON BREAD ALONE, BUT ON EVERY WORD THAT PROCEEDS OUT OF THE MOUTH OF GOD."'
(NAU)

I think that it is pretty self explanatory that you have used the scripture out of context. 

And what about this time when Jesus sent out Hid disciples?  Notice they did not take any riches or much material possesions at all. 


Mark 6:7-12
7 And He summoned the twelve and began to send them out in pairs, and gave them authority over the unclean spirits;
8 and He instructed them that they should take nothing for {their} journey, except a mere staff-- no bread, no bag, no money in their belt--
9 but {to} wear sandals; and {He added}  "Do not put on two tunics."
10 And He said to them, "Wherever you enter a house, stay there until you leave town.
11 "Any place that does not receive you or listen to you, as you go out from there, shake the dust off the soles of your feet for a testimony against them."
12 They went out and preached that {men} should repent.
(NAU)

 
 
Upvote 0

SpiritPsalmist

Heavy lean toward Messianic
Site Supporter
Jun 13, 2002
21,665
1,466
70
Southeast Kansas
✟393,824.00
Country
United States
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Single
Originally posted by spiritualscientist
Alright my mistake. But this does not prove Jesus lived an expensive lifestyle. There all indications in the bible that Jesus lived a simple life including what he preached. Jesus could not have preached water and drank wine. The soldiers could also have wanted a piece of a famous person ("King of the Jews") clothes as a souvenir not because the clothes were expensive.

 

There are many contradictions one of them is what we are discussing here about wealth. I don't know why you are repeating the question. I said in the old testament the righteous were rewarded with material wealth which is an impediment to spirituality in the new testament. Once we are through with this discussion I will show you other contraditions.

But are you trying to say the Bible is error free?

 

I'm saying the Bible does not contradict itself.  If you believe it does, it's because you lack understaning on the subject.  Like I said, if I come upon something that looks like it's contractory, it's not the Bible that's wrong.  I need to seek the Holy Spirit for the understanding so that I am balanced.
 
Upvote 0

SpiritPsalmist

Heavy lean toward Messianic
Site Supporter
Jun 13, 2002
21,665
1,466
70
Southeast Kansas
✟393,824.00
Country
United States
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Single
Originally posted by spiritualscientist
 

You forgot Jesus came to preach spirituality and not how to profit yourself in this world.

Jesus came to preach The Kingdom of Heaven.  That is definately a profit to this world. 
 
Upvote 0
Originally posted by Quaffer
I'm saying the Bible does not contradict itself.  If you believe it does, it's because you lack understaning on the subject.  Like I said, if I come upon something that looks like it's contractory, it's not the Bible that's wrong.  I need to seek the Holy Spirit for the understanding so that I am balanced.

Singing all the time the bible does not contradict itself without answering my question is meaningless.

 
 
Upvote 0

SpiritPsalmist

Heavy lean toward Messianic
Site Supporter
Jun 13, 2002
21,665
1,466
70
Southeast Kansas
✟393,824.00
Country
United States
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Single
Originally posted by spiritualscientist
Alright my mistake. But this does not prove Jesus lived an expensive lifestyle. There all indications in the bible that Jesus lived a simple life including what he preached. Jesus could not have preached water and drank wine. The soldiers could also have wanted a piece of a famous person ("King of the Jews") clothes as a souvenir not because the clothes were expensive.


I did not say Jesus lived an expensive lifestyle. He chose to live simply and I believe we should follow His example according to what God has called us to do. For what He was here to do, he did not need a house because He would have never been home. Until He started ministry at age 30 we don't really know how He lived. And, He knew it was only going to be for 3 years, not 50.

Jesus, nor His disciples were in "want" of anything. Twelve men, several, if not all with families and they were supported on the "offerings" that were in the bag that Judas was treasurer of.

Scripture tells us Judus was a thief because he "stole" from the bag. Why did they even need a treasurer if they had no money. A treasurer is not needed for barely enough to get by on. In that situation the purse would be empty more often than not. And it was most likely lower than it would have been if Judas had not been stealing from it.

Because no bus system runs in my area, I need a car. However, in New York City, I hear very few people own a car, because they don't need one. But in order for me to get to work, to pay my bills and buy food, I need to have a car. Mooching off other people is not acceptable, even in the Kingdom of Heaven.

If the soldiers had only wanted a souvineer, they would have torn the robe apart and sold it in pieces.
 

There are many contradictions one of them is what we are discussing here about wealth. I don't know why you are repeating the question. I said in the old testament the righteous were rewarded with material wealth which is an impediment to spirituality in the new testament. Once we are through with this discussion I will show you other contraditions.

And I believe you are incorrect in your assessment. :)

But are you trying to say the Bible is error free?

You remind me of an athiest who posted several pages of supposed contradictions. I took them one by one and proved him wrong. He told me that was my interpretation but then also refused to post the rest of the contradictions he had. ;)

In answer to your question: I have not found an error yet!
 
 
Upvote 0

SpiritPsalmist

Heavy lean toward Messianic
Site Supporter
Jun 13, 2002
21,665
1,466
70
Southeast Kansas
✟393,824.00
Country
United States
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Single
Originally posted by spiritualscientist
Singing all the time the bible does not contradict itself without answering my question is meaningless.

 

I don't sing the Bible, I sing Jesus. Who do you sing?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

SpiritPsalmist

Heavy lean toward Messianic
Site Supporter
Jun 13, 2002
21,665
1,466
70
Southeast Kansas
✟393,824.00
Country
United States
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Single
Originally posted by Blackhawk
 



Sure but He did not need an expensive garment.  To bring it to today we only need to get clothes from a thrift store or Kmart but we want to get them from Nordstroms or Neiman Marcus.  But my point in saying that was that everything that He owned was only transitory.  He used things for awhile and then did not need them any longer.  Just like us.  I have clothes that I wear but I only wear them for a ceratain amount of time then I get rid of them. 

He most likely did not need it, but He still had it. We don't know if He purchased it at Lord & Taylor :D or if someone gave it to Him. But we do know He wore it.

He only needed transitory. His ministry was only going to be for 3 years.

If you keep getting rid of clothes then you have to keep buying clothes. If we are able to buy better quality then in the long run we spend less money because they don't wear as fast.


John 6:5-9
5 Therefore Jesus, lifting up His eyes and seeing that a large crowd was coming to Him, said to Philip, "Where are we to buy bread, so that these may eat?"
6 This He was saying to test him, for He Himself knew what He was intending to do.
7 Philip answered Him, "Two hundred denarii worth of bread is not sufficient for them, for everyone to receive a little."
8 One of His disciples, Andrew, Simon Peter's brother, said to Him,
9 "There is a lad here who has five barley loaves and two fish, but what are these for so many people?"
(NAU)

Jesus asked if they should go out and buy them food to test His disciple's faith.  Phillip answered by saying that not even a ton of money that they clearly did not have would be able to buy them all even a little of food.  If it happened today Phillip might of said "Not even a miilion $ worth of food is sufficent" But the point clearly is that Phillip was saying to Jesus that eve nthis huge amount of money that we would never have is enough for all these people.  Jesus had other ideas on how He was going to feed them. 

Maybe that's what Philip meant and maybe not. It's speculative either way.

No that is a cop out.  No one NEEDS to have a BMW.  No one needs to have a huge mansion.  no one needs to have more money than they can ever spend.  We only need a certain amount of food to survive.  Also you only quoted part of the scriptureabout living on "Bread alone." Let's read the rest of it. 

You do not know everyone's situation. You are not to judge another man's servant. I have no desire for a BMW, but if God were to give me one, I don't think I'd refuse it. :) It's true, no one needs to have more money than they can use. That's why we're supposed to give. But how can I give what I don't have? My excess is to become a blessing to someone else.

2 Cor 9:8 And God is able to make all grace abound toward you; that ye, always have all sufficiency in all things , may abound to every good work:



Matt 4:3-4
3 And the tempter came and said to Him, "If You are the Son of God, command that these stones become bread."
4 But He answered and said, "It is written, "MAN SHALL NOT LIVE ON BREAD ALONE, BUT ON EVERY WORD THAT PROCEEDS OUT OF THE MOUTH OF GOD."'
(NAU)

I think that it is pretty self explanatory that you have used the scripture out of context. 

I don't believe I've taken it out of context at all. We live by faith, according to the Word of God. Not our word, but His. I personally, need things that someone else does not need. And if God want's to work it out so I have something that's a want I'm not going to tell Him "no thanks"

I have a friend who I envited to the christmas banquet where I use to work. They were giving away free airline tickets and and my friend won round trip tickets to Germany.

She went home and discussed it with her husband and they decided they did not need them. They prayed and asked God to show them what to do with them.

The Lord brought to her remembrance a couple in our church who were from Germany. She called them and said, "Eric, do you need to go to Germany". He began to tell her, how his wife, Susan, was very ill and needed a particular medical procedure that no-one in the US would do. He said they were trying to find a way to Germany. My friend, said, "well, Eric, I have your tickets". He broke down and cried.

The Lord gave her excess, and she re-directed it, to where He told her. She was blessed, they were blessed, I was blessed. We serve an Awesome God.


And what about this time when Jesus sent out Hid disciples?  Notice they did not take any riches or much material possesions at all. 


Mark 6:7-12
7 And He summoned the twelve and began to send them out in pairs, and gave them authority over the unclean spirits;
8 and He instructed them that they should take nothing for {their} journey, except a mere staff-- no bread, no bag, no money in their belt--
9 but {to} wear sandals; and {He added}  "Do not put on two tunics."
10 And He said to them, "Wherever you enter a house, stay there until you leave town.
11 "Any place that does not receive you or listen to you, as you go out from there, shake the dust off the soles of your feet for a testimony against them."
12 They went out and preached that {men} should repent.
(NAU)

And what about the other times where He told them different? Each situation is different. We're to operate according to how the Holy Spirit leads, each and every time.

Luke 22:35, 36 And He said to them, "When I sent you out without money belt and bag and sandals, you did not lack anything, did you?" They said, "No, nothing." And He said to them, "But now, whoever has a money belt is to take it along, likewise also a bag, and whoever has no sword is to sell his coat and buy one.
 
 
Upvote 0
I did not say Jesus lived an expensive lifestyle. He chose to live simply and I believe we should follow His example according to what God has called us to do. For what He was here to do, he did not need a house because He would have never been home. Until He started ministry at age 30 we don't really know how He lived. And, He knew it was only going to be for 3 years, not 50.

At least we are agreeing here

Scripture tells us Judus was a thief because he "stole" from the bag. Why did they even need a treasurer if they had no money. A treasurer is not needed for barely enough to get by on. In that situation the purse would be empty more often than not. And it was most likely lower than it would have been if Judas had not been stealing from it.

They were 12 so you expect them to have a way of budgeting their money. Having a treasurer does not mean they were rich. Thats why they were having a problem feeding the 5000 people. If they were rich the bible could have at least said so and indicate their source of revenue. Since they were moslty spreading the gospel they did not have much time to make money.  

Because no bus system runs in my area, I need a car. However, in New York City, I hear very few people own a car, because they don't need one. But in order for me to get to work, to pay my bills and buy food, I need to have a car. Mooching off other people is not acceptable, even in the Kingdom of Heaven.

Remember in true spirituality there is no business going to work. It is called "Seek first the Kingdom of God". But we have little faith and thats why we go to work. Spirituality is the opposite of the physical.

If the soldiers had only wanted a souvineer, they would have torn the robe apart and sold it in pieces. 

You don't sell souvenirs, you keep them

And I believe you are incorrect in your assessment. 

Explain why I am incorrect

You remind me of an athiest who posted several pages of supposed contradictions. I took them one by one and proved him wrong. He told me that was my interpretation but then also refused to post the rest of the contradictions he had. 

In answer to your question: I have not found an error yet!  

Alright explain this error

Mathew 22
 35  And one of them, a lawyer, asked him a question, to test him. 
 36  "Teacher, which is the great commandment in the law?" 
 37  And he said to him, "You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind. 


Luke 10
25  And behold, a lawyer stood up to put him to the test, saying, "Teacher, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?" 
 26  He said to him, "What is written in the law? How do you read?" 
 27  And he answered, "You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your strength, and with all your mind; and your neighbor as yourself." 
 28  And he said to him, "You have answered right; do this, and you will live."

 
In Mathew it is Jesus who answered the question while in Luke it was the lawyer
 
Upvote 0

LouisBooth

Well-Known Member
Feb 6, 2002
8,895
64
✟19,588.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
"So in essence you don't need to read the laws of Moses. Thats what I have been saying so we don't have an argument here. "

I totally disagree, the law now serves as a guide, not to be strictly adhered to or die, but as an instruction manual on how to live.

"does dringing your mercedes living beggars in the street dying of hunger constitute to God showing you? "

Sorry those living on the streets I have encountered so far 1. DON'T want a job, 2. DON'T want to work or do anything 3. Use it for drugs/alcohol.

I usually offer food to them which I am called to do...meeting their needs. I also tell them that my church would probably pay them to do work, which they always refuse. I have also been refused when I offer to take them to lunch. The problem is most 'beggers' no-adays see that as their job, not a one time thing.

"Follow the example of Christ. "

I do, but if you come on here claiming one thing and live another without struggling, I'd say there is a problem with either the teaching or you. I'd personally say its the teaching.

"First go read luke Chapter 6 beatitudes and then come back we discuss. "

Done, it says NOTHING about money at all.

"I am only guiding people in understanding the Gospels."

I would humbly disagree. so far you have said to me 1. you don't understand so go read the bible, and this was on your FIRST post to me, so you dont' know me from Adam and 2. You say you are teaching the gospels but cannot provide scripture to back up to say its wrong to have money.
 
Upvote 0

Andrew

Well-Known Member
Feb 25, 2002
4,974
22
✟13,840.00
Faith
Non-Denom
"No that is a cop out.Ê No oneÊNEEDS to have a BMW.Ê No one needs to have a huge mansion.Ê no one needs to have more money than theyÊcan ever spend.Ê We only need a certain amount of food to survive.Ê Also you only quoted part of the scriptureabout living on "Bread alone." Let's read the rest of it.Ê"

If you want to talk about needs, do we really need to live in a house? Why not on the streets or in the desert like John the Baptist. Do we really need bread and water? Why not just locust and wild honey?

If you go by that reasoning, where do you draw the line? Who gives you the authority to say Ok a Christian lifestyle shld be this: No BMWs, no mansions, no.... next you'll be specifying how many CC, land area etc -- it sounds all real Communistic.

Then ask yourself also, did Abraham/Job need that many servants and cattle-- hundreds, thousands. The Bible said he was VERY RICH. I'm sure they didnt "need" all that abundance! And if as you say they dont "need" all that, why did God bless them with all that? Did God make a boo-boo?

Ge 13:2 And Abram was very rich in cattle, in silver, and in gold.
Ge 24:1 And Abraham was old, and well stricken in age: and the LORD had blessed Abraham in all things.

Job 42:12 So the LORD blessed the latter end of Job more than his beginning: for he had fourteen thousand sheep, and six thousand camels, and a thousand yoke of oxen, and a thousand she asses.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
Originally posted by LouisBooth
"So in essence you don't need to read the laws of Moses. Thats what I have been saying so we don't have an argument here. "

I totally disagree, the law now serves as a guide, not to be strictly adhered to or die, but as an instruction manual on how to live.



You said you don't need to strictly adhere to the laws of Moses, so why read them at all. How much do you think you are supposed to follow? How do you know which law to follow and which not to follow? 


"does drivinging your mercedes living beggars in the street dying of hunger constitute to God showing you? "

Sorry those living on the streets I have encountered so far 1. DON'T want a job, 2. DON'T want to work or do anything 3. Use it for drugs/alcohol.

So you are blaming people for being poor. Do you know that nobody gave himself/herself life and that everyone is the way he/she is due to his genes and environment?  

I usually offer food to them which I am called to do...meeting their needs. I also tell them that my church would probably pay them to do work, which they always refuse. I have also been refused when I offer to take them to lunch. The problem is most 'beggers' no-adays see that as their job, not a one time thing.

Good, As long as you are doing what is right in the eyes of God, that is what is important.

"Follow the example of Christ. "

I do, but if you come on here claiming one thing and live another without struggling, I'd say there is a problem with either the teaching or you. I'd personally say its the teaching.

How do you know I am not struggling? I don't like these type of baseless judgements.

"First go read luke Chapter 6 beatitudes and then come back we discuss. "

Done, it says NOTHING about money at all.

Go to this thread so that we can discuss further

http://www.christianforums.com/threads/24139.html


"I am only guiding people in understanding the Gospels."

I would humbly disagree. so far you have said to me 1. you don't understand so go read the bible, and this was on your FIRST post to me, so you dont' know me from Adam and 2. You say you are teaching the gospels but cannot provide scripture to back up to say its wrong to have money.

Are you reading only the posts that I am replying to you? If you read all my posts in this thread (i started posting four days ago) you will find that I have refered to the bible and explained.

I didn't say it is wrong to have money, but it is wrong to be rich.

 
 
Upvote 0
Originally posted by Andrew
"No that is a cop out.Ê No oneÊNEEDS to have a BMW.Ê No one needs to have a huge mansion.Ê no one needs to have more money than theyÊcan ever spend.Ê We only need a certain amount of food to survive.Ê Also you only quoted part of the scriptureabout living on "Bread alone." Let's read the rest of it.Ê"

If you want to talk about needs, do we really need to live in a house? Why not on the streets or in the desert like John the Baptist. Do we really need bread and water? Why not just locust and wild honey?

If you go by that reasoning, where do you draw the line? Who gives you the authority to say Ok a Christian lifestyle shld be this: No BMWs, no mansions, no.... next you'll be specifying how many CC, land area etc -- it sounds all real Communistic.

Then ask yourself also, did Abraham/Job need that many servants and cattle-- hundreds, thousands. The Bible said he was VERY RICH. I'm sure they didnt "need" all that abundance! And if as you say they dont "need" all that, why did God bless them with all that? Did God make a boo-boo?

Ge 13:2 And Abram was very rich in cattle, in silver, and in gold.
Ge 24:1 And Abraham was old, and well stricken in age: and the LORD had blessed Abraham in all things.

Job 42:12 So the LORD blessed the latter end of Job more than his beginning: for he had fourteen thousand sheep, and six thousand camels, and a thousand yoke of oxen, and a thousand she asses.

I would need to live comfortably so that I am not distracted in my search for the Kingdom of God. I don't need a rich life as this is going to blind me, in that it will make me a lover of life, a lover of the world, will make me proud. Being rich also implies you have no compassion for the poor.

You are better of understanding the meaning of riches if you read the Gospels.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

SpiritPsalmist

Heavy lean toward Messianic
Site Supporter
Jun 13, 2002
21,665
1,466
70
Southeast Kansas
✟393,824.00
Country
United States
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Single
Originally posted by s0uljah
Um, didn't Jesus say blessed are the poor? Since when did money start being a goal for Christians anyway?

If I don't have the money to do what God has called me to do then I would say that my faith is in need of repair somewhere.

It may be my words: "O me O my, God's called me to go to Russia on a mission trip but I just don't know how I'm going to get the money to go"  Boo hoo boo hoo.  :cry:

It may be my actions: "I've got to find as many people as possible to hit up for money because I've got this mission trip to go on and I've got to raise the money."  :sigh:

Both examples are lack of faith.  If God has called you, then it is His responsibilty to lead you to the people whom He will direct to give you what you need to accomplish what He's called you to.

Each situation is different.  What I need to accomplish what He's called me to is different from what you need to accomplish what He's called you to.

Jesus is the goal.  He says we don't need to be concerned with what we wear or where we live.  He cares about the birds and the lillies of the field are in great array so how much more will He care for and array (which means rich apparial) us.

Yes, He clothes us with His glory, but that does not mean that our bodies have to wear rags.  I just had some more clothes given to me the other night.  Right off the boutique rack.  Never worn.  Very expensive.  And I did not spend a penny.  But I'm sure that there will be some jealous sister or brother out there somewhere, who when they see me wear those outfits will judge me and say, "that must be where all her money goes.  No wonder she can't pay her bills!" 

Our eyes and our desires are to be toward Him.  When they are, He just can't help Himself. . .He bestows on us good and precious gifts.  When He gives me more than enough, I pass it on to someone else and bless them.  What's wrong with that?
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.