Originally posted by Wolseley
Protestants call the Deuterocanonical books "the Apocrypha".
Wrong, Jews and Protestants call it the Apocrypha.
Upvote
0
Originally posted by Wolseley
Protestants call the Deuterocanonical books "the Apocrypha".
Among the three divisions of the Jewish scripture, only two appear in the New Testament: the Law (of Moses) and the Prophets (cf. Matthew 7:12, John 1:45, Acts 13:15, Romans 3:21). The closest we can get to the three divisions is in Luke 24:44 that says "the Law of Moses, the Prophets and Psalms". Stating that Psalms represents the rest of the Writings is a weak argument because the same is never applied to the Law and the Prophets. Whilst it indicates the existence of the three divisions of the Jewish scripture, Luke 24:44 gives more evidence that the third division (Writings) in Jesus time was still open-ended. The absence of quotation in the New Testament from Esther, Song of Songs, Ecclesiastes, Ezra and Nehemiah, all belong to the Writings, gives further evidence. The New Testament does not quote from Obadiah, Nahum and Haggai but the Twelve Minor Prophets was traditionally reckoned as one book. Apparently there is no quotation from Judges, but Ruth, the source of Jesus genealogy in the first Gospel, was combined with it. Also Lamentations, from where there is also no quotation, was combined with Jeremiah.
[If] the New Testament, upon which all Christian sects agree for its canon, defines an Old Testament implicitly by the books it quotes this would mean that we must regard the book of Enoch as part of the Old Testament since it is quoted in Jude, and only a very few groups of Christians regard Enoch as canonical. This, however, is not the only case where the New Testament makes use of what is widely regarded as Apocryphal sources (i.e. "non-canonical" sources). On the other hand, Ecclesiastes, Esther, and Canticles are not quoted -- so if the New Testament defines a canon then these omissions must be explained.
Originally posted by KC Catholic
See why I am Wols padawon?
Originally posted by AngelAmidala
Not to interrupt...but it's PADAWAN.
/me giggles
Back to your regularly or not so regularly planned discussion.
Originally posted by Wolseley
Elnaam, my dear fellow, I didn't say it was a direct quote; I said it was an allusion to the Deterocanonical Scripture.
And I will kindly remind you that you are in the Catholic forum now; that you may not debate in here; that you may not disparage or denegrate Catholicism in here; and that you also have more than your fair share of warnings and cautions on your account.
You throw your weight around in here, and I will put you on vacation so fast you'll think you imagined you were actually here. Capische?
And now I'm off to the Staff Forums, to let Erwin and all the other Administrators know what I just said, to save you the trouble.
Originally posted by Wolseley
LOL. Okay, here: These books are canonical Scripture, according to the Catholic Church:
1 Maccabees
2 Maccabees
Judith
Sirach
Wisdom
Tobit
Baruch
and additional chapters in both Esther and Daniel.
Protestants call these seven books and extra chapters "apocryphal". We call them "Deuterocanonical".
Does that help?
Originally posted by BaMerz
Dear Brother Elnaam, have you looked down and noticed that your feet are quite dusty?
Now, now---settle down, VOW. Remember: "It's not nice to fool Mother Nature!"(Wolseley, you RAT!)