You see, you thought you explained while your explanation actually failed. What you're saying is that Fitzgerald doesn't have evidence of a crime (even though Armitrage confessed to being the leaker), yet somehow you know for a fact that there was a crime. And you accuse me of bootlicking?
If they leaked classified information, why were'nt they charged. Sounds like an open and shut case?
Read it again Einstien:You see, you thought you explained while your explanation actually failed. What you're saying is that Fitzgerald doesn't have evidence of a crime (even though Armitrage confessed to being the leaker), yet somehow you know for a fact that there was a crime. And you accuse me of bootlicking?
Actaully, your memory served me well since I can't remember an explanation that never was. Your's was no explanation at all, it was just wishful thinking fueled by your dislke of all things Bush. No charges, because there was no crime.Read it again Einstien:
"Stop being coy.
You know darn well the reason why no charges where filed as it has been explained to you. In your deep commitment to defend the undefendable, you may stay in denial, but it has been explained to you, to Jameswright3, and to Oldetang as why no charges were filed."
I never said anything about a criminal charge. I said you know why charges weren't filed; in fact I explained it to you. You fained memory loss and questioned my integrity; which you have ZERO.
Well no, it's a summation of Fitzgerald's explanation why no charges were filed. aka fact.Actaully, your memory served me well since I can't remember an explanation that never was. Your's was no explanation at all, it was just wishful thinking fueled by your dislke of all things Bush. No charges, because there was no crime.
Exactly, no crimeWell no, it's a summation of Fitzgerald's explanation why no charges were filed. aka fact.
You seem to have a familiarity with this subjectIt really isn't that hard to understand; unless boot shoe polish permeates the tongue and effects the brain.
go here - http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19728346/ click on the pic of bush next to the article and listen to the clip. He did not say what the article claims. He does not admit that someone in the administration leaked - he says PERHAPS.Please unbias my ears.