Where did the <I>first</I> genetic <I>information</I> (DNA) come from, since all known information came from an intelligence?
That's a funny claim. It's also not true. We'll add "information theory" to your list of studies, shall we?
Information does not need intelligence. The light from a star is packed with information, for instance.
How could chance, mutations, & time create <I>new</I> animal kinds, since no known mutations have ever created <I><B>new</B></I> genetic information?
We'll add "genetics" to your list of studies, shall we? A simple duplication followed by a point mutation adds information by any formal measure, and even something as simple as a mutation that gives someone purple eyes adds it to a population by informal measures.
If you're going to babble about "information" I suggest you learn about it.
How many <I>mutations</I> (positive ones) would have been needed to go from a non-living Atom to the first man, Adam?
The first man was named Adam? And he came from atoms? Weirie. See, I figured the first population of true
homo sapiens would have been impossible to pick out, except as an arbitrary point looking backwards. Indeed, as a nice table on talk.origins points out, it seems to be the way Creationists see it. Why, they can't seem to agree on which skull is true homo sapiens!
Since men didn't evolve from atoms but from other animals, the rest of your question is nonsense.
We can, if you wish to pursue this, add "abiogenesis" to your study list.
How much <I>time</I> would have been needed for all of these positive mutations to occur? How could all of these supposedly positive mutations overcome the cells <I>corrective processes? </I>
Oh, I'd say about 3.5 billion years or so. At least, that's what it looks like. As for "corrective processes" you are aware that you are the carrier of several unique mutations yourself, right?
Why do statistical computer analyses now show that, not millions or even trillions, but virtually <I><B>infinite</B></I> time would have been required for evolution from an atom to an Adam, even if positive mutations were actually common.
Really? How neat. What simulations? By whom? What assumptions did they make? I'm particularly amazed at how they managed to come up with an abiogenetic pathway, since that's currently an area of much research, and few conclusions.
If I didn't know better, I'd assume you were simply
making that up. But I know better. You didn't make it up. Someone else did, and you believed it.
The amount of genetic information that would have to have been generated by chance mutations is incomprehensibly massive.
So you say. So it fails to be. You
so need to hit the books, boyo.
Are evolutionary studies about ORIGINS, science or history?
Evolutionary studies are about the diversity of life.
Do you believe that evolution is true? If so, then provide an answer to the following questions. "Evolution" in this context is the idea that natural, undirected processes are sufficient to account for the existence of all natural things.
Do you believe God exists? "God", in this context, refers to the hairy little man who lives next to me.Hehe! Making up your own strawmen is fun!
Something from nothing?
The "Big Bang", the most widely accepted theory of the beginning of the universe, states that everything developed from a small dense cloud of subatomic particles and radiation which exploded, forming hydrogen (and some helium) gas.
Named by a Jesuit, the atheistic scum. And, by the way, your 'synopsis' of the Big Bang isn't right either. It's not even close. Do you know what
inflation is?
Where did this energy/matter come from?
How reasonable is it to assume it came into being from nothing?
And even if it did come into being, what would cause it to explode?
There was no explosion. *shrug*. This is what you get when you don't study.
Franklin, I enjoy your challenges. However, don't you feel that it's a
tad appropriate to acknowledge all these people pointing out your errors, rather then move on to committing new ones?
This, for instance:
Information theory states that "information" <I><B>never</B></I> arises out of randomness or chance events
Really? Where? Point it out, please. Oh, and also explain how M&NS is "randomness or chance events".
