Many years Tyndale,
I understand that we all have our views to support and thus nothing contradicting can step in the way.
It is obvious that Jude quoted from Enoch - I mean he says it himself.
No, I disagree. Just because a book is named Enoch, it doesn't mean the prophet Enoch wrote it. He couldn't have anyway as that book was written (150-80 B.C.). Jude was referring to what Enoch prophesied, not what the book Enoch says.
As far as you presentation that EYEWITNESSES are the writers of the Scripture, I think that you will find that that is not the case for both Ss. Mark and Luke were not eyewitnesses of what they wrote in their Gospels - so this rule of yours is obviously incorrect.
Luke 1 v [2] Even as they delivered them unto us, which
from the beginning were eyewitnesses, and ministers of the word;
[3]
It seemed good to me also, having had perfect understanding of all things from the very first, to write unto thee in order, most excellent Theophilus,
Luke (Colossians 4:14,) was an eyewitness to Christ's teachings and life.
The gospel of Mark was written around 66-70 AD, and the author was also an eyewitness to Christ's teachings and life.
This is how the scripture was written, by eyewitnesses. Remember God doesn't change his ways (Malachi 3:6). He told Moses to write down a song (Deuteronomy 31:19-21) , he told Isaiah "Take thee a great roll, and write"...(8:1). he told Jeremiah also to "Write thee all the words that I have spoken unto thee in a book" (30:2).
.....and Luke is no different, he even makes us aware of this in the opening verses.
Why would God contradict himself and change his method of writing scripture just to facilitate a book called Enoch?