Test Your Civics

YamiB

Regular Member
Mar 8, 2006
492
27
✟8,302.00
Faith
Pagan
Marital Status
In Relationship
Have to say if you're an American and those are difficult questions it's not a good thing. Even worse if you look at the percentage of high school seniors that answered them correctly.


It is amazing how stupid highschool seniors can be in this country. In my 11th grade Lit class there were many people who had trouble telling apart Verbs, Nouns, and Adjectives.

I'm not sure how Saddam Hussein's political party is part of American Civics, though.
Since we went to war twice against the man I think he has become an important figure in modern US history.
 
Upvote 0

OhhJim

Often wrong, but never in doubt
Aug 19, 2004
4,483
287
66
Walnut Creek, CA
✟6,051.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Since we went to war twice against the man I think he has become an important figure in modern US history.

U.S. History, yes.
Current Events, yes.
U.S. Civics, not really.

It's a quibble, of course, but I suggest that a person could be an expert on American Civics and have no idea what Hussein's political party was. And it certainly isn't a basic question. It's like asking who held the homerun record before Babe Ruth, and claiming Americans know nothing about baseball, when nobody gets it right.

For the record, I got that question right. ;)
 
Upvote 0

Zimfan

Well-Known Member
Dec 12, 2005
868
45
40
DFW
✟8,753.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Engaged
Politics
US-Libertarian
A flat tax is applied equally, a progressive tax is applied more heavily to those with higher incomes(this is what we have in the U.S.). A Regressive tax would be applied more heavily to those with lower incomes. I'm not sure any country in the world has that kind. Certainly not the U.S., where someone with a low income like me(under $20,000 a year) pays an abusrdly low percentage of my income in taxes while my much better off Uncle pays something like 38% or so(or whatever that tax cut a few years back lowered it to for the highest income bracket). :wave:

Edit: I was mistaken on one point, while income tax in the U.S. is progressive, Social Security taxes are regressive.

Historian,

Thanks for this thread. My college education was not wasted afterall! lol.

In college I learned that immigrants knew more about civics than others (probably the testing required for citizenship).

A progressive tax is one that is applied equally amongst the income table (to the poor, middleclassed and wealthy). There are few of these in the U.S. **Sandi ducks. lol. (sorry but the middleclass seems to carry more than it's share).

For 100 blessings who can tell me the regressive tax in the United States that has a suggested religious underpinning? (tee, hee). :)
 
Upvote 0

Norseman

EAC Representative
Apr 29, 2004
4,706
256
20
Currently in China
✟13,677.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
The answer that they provide for the last question is wrong.
http://www.warresisters.org/piechart.htm

We spend more on our military than the rest of the world combined, yet we have old people who have to choose between medication and food. That alone should let you know which answer is correct.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Zimfan

Well-Known Member
Dec 12, 2005
868
45
40
DFW
✟8,753.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Engaged
Politics
US-Libertarian
Spent more on Social Security last year, as well.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2007/

Warning, lots of rather dull charts to dig through to get the information.

Adding 80% of the payments towards the national debt to the total for military spending is absurd, especially under the reasoning that "most (if not all) of the national debt would have been eliminated." Congress has always shown a great ability to waste all of our money rather than pay down the debt.

I think the Iraq war has been a huge waste of money, and I think we could save a lot of money closing down many of the cold war era bases in Europe. Countries like Germany are certainly rich enough to defend themselves now, and not under the risk of invasion from Russia. But fudging numbers isn't the best way to make a point.
 
Upvote 0

MercuryAndy

Senior Veteran
Mar 6, 2006
4,525
37
33
Scotland
✟12,446.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Spent more on Social Security last year, as well.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2007/

Warning, lots of rather dull charts to dig through to get the information.

Adding 80% of the payments towards the national debt to the total for military spending is absurd, especially under the reasoning that "most (if not all) of the national debt would have been eliminated." Congress has always shown a great ability to waste all of our money rather than pay down the debt.

I think the Iraq war has been a huge waste of money, and I think we could save a lot of money closing down many of the cold war era bases in Europe. Countries like Germany are certainly rich enough to defend themselves now, and not under the risk of invasion from Russia. But fudging numbers isn't the best way to make a point.

Germany has realy been rich enough to defend itself. Its more of a if we get destroyed we are launching our nukes from germany incase our ones in america get blown up.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums