Universal Salvation or Universal Reconciliation

Status
Not open for further replies.

Rafael

Only time enough for love
Jul 25, 2002
2,570
319
73
Midwest
Visit site
✟6,445.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Thanks for addressing and answering my question, Cougan, but I still don't understand completely. I thought that when Christ was crucified at the cross he descended into hell and took the keys of life and death, He arose, also leading captivity captive - does this represent a point in time or eternity? In God's judgment, I have wondered if this may be the point where those who had never heard of Christ were given the chance to accept Him as Savior. Now this would raise other questions if thought to be true, but I've never heard much speculation on how God would deal with men of good heart but no knowledge of the truth in the Savior, Jesus.

This may also address what Websitejack had to say about the three ways into the Kingdom.

God seems to be able to transcend time and eternity, and leading captivity captive may be more than just symbology. I think of when Jesus spoke of Lazarus the beggar being in paradise and the man who passed him by in this life being in hell begging for a drop of water as an example.
 
Upvote 0

websitejack

Having done all ~ Stand
Aug 12, 2002
48
2
Visit site
✟212.00
Originally posted by LouisBooth
"Umm...2 of three of those can't be done. 1. There are no innocents. Paul says so as much in romans. 2. There are no ignorant, for God has revieled himself to all, thus we do have one way faith in Christ.

Universal salvaiton is quite wrong and denies several verses in the bible.

Louis,

I believe that Christ reveals himself to all as well...the word declares:

John 1:7 This man came for a witness, to bear witness of the Light, that all through him might believe. 8 He was not that Light, but was sent to bear witness of that Light. 9 That was the true Light which gives light to every man coming into the world

I also believe there is ONLY ONE WAY into the Kingdom…and that is by faith in Christ.

So do you believe that there is another chance for at least some to make a decision for Christ after death?

The alternatives is that babies who died and those who never had the Gospel declared to them to know the way are in hell...forever.

What is your view?
 
Upvote 0

websitejack

Having done all ~ Stand
Aug 12, 2002
48
2
Visit site
✟212.00
Originally posted by Slave2SinNoMore
Do we really believe in hell with all our hearts? If we did, we would indeed be moving heaven and earth to prevent people from going to hell .

I am ashamed. I don't witness enough, and I would bet that most people don't. I have a friend that witnesses constantly, but I bet he's in the minority.

We should all let the Holy Spirit speak his words whenever we have the opportunity!

Amen-

Quite frankly whether Hell is forever or even one minute it is a place you don't want anyone to go.

websitejack
 
Upvote 0

websitejack

Having done all ~ Stand
Aug 12, 2002
48
2
Visit site
✟212.00
Originally posted by raphe
I thought that when Christ was crucified at the cross he descended into hell and took the keys of life and death, He arose, also leading captivity captive - does this represent a point in time or eternity? In God's judgment, I have wondered if this may be the point where those who had never heard of Christ were given the chance to accept Him as Savior.

Interesting...

I know that what occured at/on the cross is sooooo much bigger that my natural mind can wrap around.

He knew me before I was born, he knows me now and he knows me a million years from now...all at the same time. ;) Time is definatly viewed from a different vantage point for Him.

We worship a B I G God, and yet he calls me His friend.

Amazed again by His grace...

jack
 
Upvote 0

Andrew

Well-Known Member
Feb 25, 2002
4,974
22
✟13,840.00
Faith
Non-Denom
"Again, the question is not are all in Christ yet, but will all eventually freely receive the ransom that was paid for them."

As I said earlier scripture has already answered that clearly with "no" So I dont see why some Christians must start believing otherwise and start some new movt.

Mt 25:46 And these shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous into life eternal.

Mr 3:29 But he that shall blaspheme against the Holy Ghost hath never forgiveness, but is in danger of eternal damnation:

and why wld the Bible warn us abt this if all humankind wld eventually make it to heaven?

quote:"So do you believe that there is another chance for at least some to make a decision for Christ after death?"

nope. only the catholics believe that and its called purgatory. also pls show scripture which tells us clearly we have a second chance after death. Bible says man is appointed to die once and after that the judgement.

"The alternatives is that babies who died"
they are in heaven cos their spirits were alive when born. they only die spiritually when comes to age of accountability/understnding of law/right/wrong. that's why Paul said " I was alive once then I died." in Romans. surely he was not refering to physical death.

" and those who never had the Gospel declared to them to know the way are in hell...forever."

God is fair and they are judged by their consciences. and all the more why we need to send out missionaries and the time is short.
 
Upvote 0

Rafael

Only time enough for love
Jul 25, 2002
2,570
319
73
Midwest
Visit site
✟6,445.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I'm curious as to where the Catholic view of purgatory comes from in the Bible. It may have something to do with Luke 16:20-25. There is also a verse in the Bible that vaguely refers to prayer for the dead that no one seems to have an explaination for.

I personally believe like you do, Andrew, but have heard a few things about the time Christ spent (three days) before arising from the dead. Just theory, though. I guess I kinda got off the original topic, a little :)

I hadn't thought of these scriptures in a long time and may have had some misleading teaching from an earlier church going experience. Thanks to you all for helping me out, here, to understand better.

 
 
Upvote 0

websitejack

Having done all ~ Stand
Aug 12, 2002
48
2
Visit site
✟212.00
Originally posted by Andrew
"Again, the question is not are all in Christ yet, but will all eventually freely receive the ransom that was paid for them."

As I said earlier scripture has already answered that clearly with "no" So I dont see why some Christians must start believing otherwise and start some new movt.

Mt 25:46 And these shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous into life eternal.

Mr 3:29 But he that shall blaspheme against the Holy Ghost hath never forgiveness, but is in danger of eternal damnation:

and why wld the Bible warn us abt this if all humankind wld eventually make it to heaven?

I will start posting the eventual salvation of all's response the eternal question, but lets discuss what we have here first.

I mentioned in a past post that those who present the view that eventually all will enter into the grace provided by Christ believe that punishment/Hell is the reality for those outside of the blood of Jesus.

The bible also clearly portrays Hell as NOT A PLACE YOU WANT TO BE! Ever...and as such ALL should be warned.

In fact it is Jesus who speaks of Hell the most in the New Test, so I am not suggesting that there is no Hell. I am questioning the position of Hell being a punishment that has no end and its purpose.

It is interesting to note here that just as there will be differing degrees of reward, there are differing degrees of punishment.

The Scriptures affirm that Christ, at the time of his return will repay each person according to what he has done.

For the Son of man shall come in the glory of his Father with his angels; and then he shall reward every man according to his works.
MAT 16:27

On the opposite side of the equation, there is the matter of degrees of punishment. If anything, the Bible is even more decisive on this issue.

Jesus informed the citizens of certain communities in Galilee that in the day of judgment, it would be more tolerable for certain people of the ancient world (e.g., Tyre, Sidon, and Sodom) than for them (Mt. 11:20-24; cf. 10:15).

Christ told about a certain master who took a trip. While he was away, his servants, who had been charged with various responsibilities, disobeyed him. When the Lord returned, and discovered that some had knowingly been disobedient, while others had disobeyed in ignorance, he punished them according to the level of their culpability (Lk. 12:47-48). There is perhaps no clearer passage than this, that teaches degrees of punishment.

During the course of his trial, Jesus informed Pilate: He who delivered me unto you has the greater sin (Jn. 19:11). Does not justice require a greater punishment for a greater sin?

A man who set aside the law of God under the Mosaic regime, was executed without mercy. The writer of the book of Hebrews declares that the one who tramples on the Son of God and who treats, as a common thing, the blood by which he was sanctified, will deserve a much worse punishment (Heb. 10:26-31).

The principle is this: there is a greater level of responsibility for those who live under the better covenant, and there will be appropriate punishment meted out for those who, through apostasy, reject that which they previously embraced.

The apostle Peter wrote regarding those who had escaped the defilements of the world by virtue of their knowledge of the truth, i.e., obedience to the gospel (2 Pet. 2:20-22; cf. 1 Pet. 4:17). He warned that should they become entangled again in these defilements, and overcome, their last state (their apostate condition) would be worse than the first (the pre-conversion state).

Ominously, he says it would have been better for them never to have known the way of righteousness, than, after knowing it, to turn back to their former lifestyle. This, most assuredly, teaches a greater level of punishment for apostate Christians than for those who never knew the truth.


As far as purpose, what does the bible say regarding punishment's purpose?

5And you have forgotten the exhortation which speaks to you as to sons: "My son, do not despise the chastening of the Lord, Nor be discouraged when you are rebuked by Him; 6 For whom the Lord loves He chastens, And scourges every son whom He receives." 7 If you endure chastening, God deals with you as with sons; for what son is there whom a father does not chasten? 8 But if you are without chastening, of which all have become partakers, then you are illegitimate and not sons. 9 Furthermore, we have had human fathers who corrected us, and we paid them respect. Shall we not much more readily be in subjection to the Father of spirits and live? 10 For they indeed for a few days chastened us as seemed best to them, but He for our profit, that we may be partakers of His holiness. 11 Now no chastening seems to be joyful for the present, but painful; nevertheless, afterward it yields the peaceable fruit of righteousness to those who have been trained by it.
Heb 12:5-11

Originally posted by Andrew

quote:"So do you believe that there is another chance for at least some to make a decision for Christ after death?"

nope. only the catholics believe that and its called purgatory. also pls show scripture which tells us clearly we have a second chance after death. Bible says man is appointed to die once and after that the judgement.

"The alternatives is that babies who died"
they are in heaven cos their spirits were alive when born. they only die spiritually when comes to age of accountability/understnding of law/right/wrong. that's why Paul said " I was alive once then I died." in Romans. surely he was not refering to physical death.

" and those who never had the Gospel declared to them to know the way are in hell...forever."

God is fair and they are judged by their consciences. and all the more why we need to send out missionaries and the time is short.

Andrew,

It is the "age of accountability" thing that is more of a catholic thing!

Plus you still have the three ways...No one enters the Kingdom except through faith in Christ. We are in agreement there, but if babies and those who haven't heard are in, than it would seem that a far more effective evangelistic plan would be to kill everyone before they reach the so called line of accountability, because on a percentage basis, most will grow up and not receive Christ.

Likewise the better missionary program would be to burn all bibles and suppress the preaching of the gospel because again, the percentage of those who hear the gospel preached on the mission field and respond are far fewer that those who reject it.

Wouldn't that ultimately be more merciful?

jack
 
Upvote 0

LouisBooth

Well-Known Member
Feb 6, 2002
8,895
64
✟19,588.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
"So do you believe that there is another chance for at least some to make a decision for Christ after death?

The alternatives is that babies who died and those who never had the Gospel declared to them to know the way are in hell...forever."

I agree with the age of accountablity. You have to understand the choice in order to make it.
 
Upvote 0

Andrew

Well-Known Member
Feb 25, 2002
4,974
22
✟13,840.00
Faith
Non-Denom
raphe,

"I'm curious as to where the Catholic view of purgatory comes from in the Bible."

The Catholic Bible is different -- includes a few more books that the protestants rejected as not God inspired. I think it is in these books that purgatory is mentioned. Also, the Catholics have their church writings (eg on certain practices/beliefs) that they consider on equal authority with the Bible. ie Bible is not sole authority for them.

website jack,

age of accountability in the Bible? not sure where or if it's stated. that the concept is more Catholic? dont know, dont care. just know that Paul said he was once alive then he died when he became aware of laws. but most people put it at 12/13 or younger. i think it varies from kid to kid. there's a story in OT abt the old woman's miracle son dying. Elijah had prophesied that this barren woman wld have a child and she did. then her son died. Elijah raised him up. -- spiritual truth is that all children will die spiritually (at the age of accountability) and they must be resurrected again (rebirth).

Kill off babies?? -- well thou shalt not kill. might as well say thou shall not multiply and fill the earth.

anyway, what do you believe. u seem to be writing on behalf of this new thot group. what does your heart/spirit tell you. get that part right first or you'll just go off course.
:)
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Rafael

Only time enough for love
Jul 25, 2002
2,570
319
73
Midwest
Visit site
✟6,445.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Age of accountability escapes me too. A baby is responsible only that which a baby can be responsible for, and as it grows, this accountability changes too. Only God can see the heart and judge these things. WebsiteJacks example was extreme as an alternative to risking growing up and falling into sin and accountability, but valid and easy for me to understand.
 
Upvote 0

websitejack

Having done all ~ Stand
Aug 12, 2002
48
2
Visit site
✟212.00
The bible establishes the ONE and ONLY way to enter into the kingdom of God:

"For by grace are you saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: not of works, lest any man should boast." (Ephesians 2:8, 9)

"And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and you shall be saved, and your household." (Acts 16:31)

"To Him give all the prophets witness, that through His name whoever believes in Him shall receive remission of sins." (Acts 10:43)

"He who believes on the Son has everlasting life: and he who believes not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abides on him." (John 3:36)

"Jesus said to him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man comes to the Father, but by Me." (John 14:6)

"Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is no other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved." (Acts 4:12)

"For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus." (l Timothy 2:5)

Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that entereth not by the door into the sheepfold, but climbeth up some other way, the same is a thief and a robber. (John 10:1)

"I AM THE DOOR: BY ME IF ANY MAN ENTER IN, HE SHALL BE SAVED..." (John 10:9)

"For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16)




If you DO allow for babies and those who never heard to enter into the kingdom after they die than you MUST acknowledge that:

* a point after death exists for them to "believe in Him and not perish, but have everlasting life".

* or that there exists other ways into the kingdom (which according to the verses above, can't be possible).




If you DON'T allow for babies and those who never heard to enter into the kingdom after they die than you MUST acknowledge that:

* they are ALL in Hell

* and if Hell is endless torment forever than it is the Lord Jesus who is allowing the endless torment of these.

The idea of babies in Hell is so repugnant to believers that to hold to the doctrinal position of an everlasting Hell, the "age of accountability" clause had to invented to maintain it.

Which again, the "age of accountability" as a means to entering heaven according to the verses cited above, can't be a possibility.


I am not trying to be mean...I am just following to the natural end the doctrinal position of an everlasting Hell.

websitejack
 
Upvote 0

websitejack

Having done all ~ Stand
Aug 12, 2002
48
2
Visit site
✟212.00
So, could we be wrong in our view of an everlasting Hell?

What is the Scriptural basis for such a belief?

It looks like it all comes down to one word...the Greek word "aion", its adjective "aionios" and their derivatives.

Here is the article I will be referenceing:
from http://what-the-hell-is-hell.com/HellStudy/forever.htm

Revelation 20:10 is one of several places where we find the English phrase "forever AND ever."

And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet [are], and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever . (Rev 20:10)

In the original it is written:
eis tous aionas ton aionon anabainei

Literal translation:
Unto (or into) the eons of the eons.

King James Version:
for ever and ever.

Zondervan Parallel NT in Greek and English
unto the ages of the ages.

Young's Literal Translation:
to the ages of the ages.

Concordant Literal New Testament:
for the eons of the eons.

The part we want to focus on in the Greek is the "aionas ton aionon" part. As we can see, the literal translations and the Greek clearly focus on "ages of the ages," or "eons of the eons," rather than "for ever and ever" which actually makes no sense at all the way the Greek is constructed here.

Both "aionas" and "aionon" are in the plural in the Greek. There is no plural of "ever" in English. And if "ever" mean eternity, what is the purpose of adding another "ever?" How does "eternity and eternity" sound? Sounds pretty stupid, doesn't it? Well, that's how stupid our "for ever and ever" would sound to an early Christian. However, "ages of the ages," made perfect sense to them then and it makes perfect sense to us in modern English.

Our English word "eon" comes directly from the Greek word "aion." Our "eon" DOES have a plural form just like the Greek word "aion." So then, our English word "age" AND our English word "eon" work perfectly in correctly translating this Greek phrase. Why don't ALL of our English translations use these words instead of "for ever and ever" which makes so sense at all? Tradition!

-------------------

Below are some examples where the Greek double construct of aion shows three completely separate renderings which the King James and its kissing cousin Bibles hide from our hungry eyes. The Greek language is a very precise language. If it uses three different constructions of the double use of "aion," there is a very good reason for it. To arbitrarily translate all of them exactly the same way "forever and ever" as the KJV, NIV, NASB, NRSB, Amplified, Living, etc. have done, is NOT translating, its butchering the Greek through dark age traditions.

Singular/plural (aionos ton aionon): Ephesians 3:21
Singular/singular (aiona tou aionos): Hebrews 1:8
Plural/plural (aionas ton aionon): Revelation 20:10, 1 Peter 4:11

The word "aion" in ALL its forms refers to "ages" which have ends AND beginnings. There are at least 5 ages (perhaps more) mentioned in the Greek New Testament. There is only ONE eternity, not multiples.

If there were "aions" in the past, then it means they each must have ended for they are now past! The New Testament writers spoke of "the present wicked aion" which ended during that very generation. Obviously, it was followed by another "aion"-- the "aion" in which we presently live. If there are "aions" to come, it must mean that this one we live in will also end.

There is a verse which says "the consummation of the aions" showing that each "aion" ends. So how can they be eternal?

There is "the coming eon" (Matt.10:30, Luke 18:30
There is "the present wicked eon" (Gal.1:4)
There is "the oncoming eons (plural and future)(Eph.2:7)
There is "the conclusion of the eon (present) (Mt.13:39, 40)
There is "the secret concealed from the eons (past) (Eph.3:9)

-----------------------
 
Upvote 0

LouisBooth

Well-Known Member
Feb 6, 2002
8,895
64
✟19,588.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
"The bible establishes the ONE and ONLY way to enter into the kingdom of God:"

Ahh..but only for those that can understand the choice.

"or that there exists other ways into the kingdom (which according to the verses above, can't be possible). "

This is a illogical statement. If you are ignorant of the choice, you can't make it.

Your "theory" is also disproven by Paul in chapter(s) 9-11 of romans.
 
Upvote 0

Rafael

Only time enough for love
Jul 25, 2002
2,570
319
73
Midwest
Visit site
✟6,445.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
When it gets so complicated that I can hardly understand, then I figure it is best left to the scribes and Pharisees. When the Bible doesn't come across clear enough to understand without pages of translation, I figure I must be doomed, for sure.
Nothing against the scholars - I'm always glad to learn details, but surely God would make things important to us simple, and I think He does. I go the simple way this time............... :sorry:
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

websitejack

Having done all ~ Stand
Aug 12, 2002
48
2
Visit site
✟212.00
Originally posted by LouisBooth
"The bible establishes the ONE and ONLY way to enter into the kingdom of God:"

Ahh..but only for those that can understand the choice.

"or that there exists other ways into the kingdom (which according to the verses above, can't be possible). "

This is a illogical statement. If you are ignorant of the choice, you can't make it.

Your "theory" is also disproven by Paul in chapter(s) 9-11 of romans.

My ignorance of Jesus being The Door did not in any way make Him cease being The Door until I was saved...

"Jesus said to him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man comes to the Father, but by Me." (John 14:6)

"Neither is there salvation in any other : for there is no other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved." (Acts 4:12)

Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that entereth not by the door into the sheepfold, but climbeth up some other way, the same is a thief and a robber. (John 10:1)

"I AM THE DOOR: BY ME IF ANY MAN ENTER IN, HE SHALL BE SAVED ..." (John 10:9)

My point is, since we are in agreement that babies and the ignorant will enter the Kingdom, there must be an opportunity after death for these to acknowledge Christ and enter in through Him.

what say you?

websitejack
 
Upvote 0

websitejack

Having done all ~ Stand
Aug 12, 2002
48
2
Visit site
✟212.00
Originally posted by raphe
but surely God would make things important to us simple

Pro 25:2 [It is] the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings [is] to search out a matter.

Originally posted by raphe
When the Bible doesn't come across clear enough to understand without pages of translation, I figure I must be doomed, for sure.

raphe,

It is simple...believe on the Lord Jesus and you will be saved . If your there, (which from your past posts, it seems to me you are) there is no doom for you my friend.

We are being changed from glory to glory...it only gets better from here :clap:

2Cr 3:17 Now the Lord is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord [is], there [is] liberty.

2Cr 3:18 But we all, with open face beholding as in a glass the glory of the Lord, are changed into the same image from glory to glory, [even] as by the Spirit of the Lord.

websitejack
 
Upvote 0

LouisBooth

Well-Known Member
Feb 6, 2002
8,895
64
✟19,588.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
"My ignorance of Jesus being The Door did not in any way make Him cease being The Door until I was saved...
"

This is not what I stated. Your ignorance of knowing you needed to make a choice or understanding what the choice was DOES effect your responsiblity for that choice.


"there must be an opportunity after death for these to acknowledge Christ and enter in through Him."

I disagree. They do not know of the choice, so they are not held responsible for it. there is no chance after death.
 
Upvote 0

websitejack

Having done all ~ Stand
Aug 12, 2002
48
2
Visit site
✟212.00
Originally posted by LouisBooth
I disagree. They do not know of the choice, so they are not held responsible for it. there is no chance after death.

I guess we are going to have to agree to disagree on this point because it looks to me from the passages quoted earlier that no one comes to the Father except in the way established.

Also as I mentioned in a past post, if ignorance voids the responsibility of the cross, than a much more fruitful evangelism plan is ignorance.

Also I am curious, what is your scriptural basis for "no chance after death"?

Originally posted by LouisBooth
Your "theory" is also disproven by Paul in chapter(s) 9-11 of romans.

o.k. There is a lot of stuff in Rom 9-11 what specifically are you pointing to?

websitejack
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

SavedByGrace3

Jesus is Lord of ALL! (Not asking permission)
Site Supporter
Jun 6, 2002
19,729
3,713
Midlands
Visit site
✟560,835.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
WebsiteJack has many good points in his posts. Many of these points about hell, eternal punishment, universal salvation/reconciliation etc... are simply too much for the orthodox faith system to deal with. Babies in eternal hell??? Never! Not the God that I have come to know. Most of the Christain groups I have studied take the "head in the sand" approach to these uncomfortable issues. Some invent extra-biblical doctrines to deal with them. Age of accountability and purgatory are a couple examples. I don't think inventing doctrine to get one's self out of a corner is a good practice. It just creates more questions that require the invention of more corners that one has to escape from and eventually you end up where RC is.
Some groups like the Jehovah Witnesses have choosen to simply remove the concept of etenal hell from their version (NWT) of the bible. If memory serves they also allow those who died without hearing the gospel a second chance.
The universal reconciliation is an interesting concept in that it allows for all men to be reconciled but not necessarily saved. Christ has in fact taken away all the sins of all human in the whole world:

John 1:29
(ASV) On the morrow he seeth Jesus coming unto him, and saith, Behold, the Lamb of God, that taketh away the sin of the world!
1 John 2:2
(GW) He is the payment for our sins, and not only for our sins, but also for the sins of the whole world.
2Co 5
19 namely, that God was in Christ reconciling the world to Himself, not counting their trespasses against them, and He has committed to us the word of reconciliation.
Heb 2
9 But we see Jesus, who was made a little lower than the angels for the suffering of death, crowned with glory and honor; that he by the grace of God should taste death for every man.


Universal salvation is a bit more difficult as pointed out in a number of posts. One way is "ONE" way.

Ultimately we have to trust that He is just.

Deu 32
4 He is the Rock, his work is perfect: for all his ways are judgment: a God of truth and without iniquity: just and right is he.


If we take this approach, then we have to look at how He deals out justice.
Look at these scriptures:

Heb 2
2 For if the word spoken by angels was steadfast, and every transgression and disobedience received a just recompense of reward;
Exo 2
24 Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot,


God will deal out a punishment that equals the sin. Eye for eye.... not life for eye. Tooth for tooth, not eternal hell for tooth. That is the meaning of "just recompence of reward". The punishment will match the sin.
This judgement is seen in Revelation:

Rev 20:12
(12) And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of the things which were written in the books, according to their works.


So we come to the question: What sin is so grievious that it would merit eternal torment in a burning hell? As evil as Hitler and others were, the horrors they commited are not anything near the equivalent of an "eternal hell". As much are some deserve mucho punishment, it would not be justice to inflict infinite torment for finite sin.

Finally there is the 3 days and 3 nights concept. The suffering that Christ endured lasted for at most 3 days and 3 nights. At some point God determined that the punishement that was due the world for sin was paid:

Isa 53:11
(11) He shall see of the travail of his soul, and shall be satisfied: by his knowledge shall my righteous servant justify many; for he shall bear their iniquities.


Christ did not endure an etenal hell fire for the sins of 6 billion(+) souls as it would seem justice would require. God is very concerned with equality and balance:

Proverbs 11
1 (KJV)
A false balance is abomination to the Lord: but a just weight is his delight.
Lev 19
35
(35) Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgment, in weight, in measure of length or of capacity.
Mic 6
11 Shall I count them pure with the wicked balances, and with the bag of deceitful weights?


Few reasonable people would see balance and justice in "eternal hell". Job comments that we are not more just than God:


Job 4
17 Shall mortal man be more just than God? shall a man be more pure than his maker?


Just thoughts on the topic.
Peace

 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.