Kalevalatar

Supisuomalainen sisupussi
Jul 5, 2005
5,469
908
Pohjola
✟20,327.00
Country
Finland
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I have read it but I really can't say if it's any good. :) Many English translation exist. What might be "the best" version, I can't say either. But let me assure you that the text itself is short and quick to read: you can read it at one sitting. Since it's public domain, here is an excerpt to give you an idea.

The entire Mr. Giles's 1910 translation with comments can be found here.

[SIZE=+1]The Art of War[/SIZE]​

By Sun Tzu​

Translated by Lionel Giles​

I. Laying Plans

1. Sun Tzu said: The art of war is of vital importance to the State.

2. It is a matter of life and death, a road either to safety or to ruin. Hence it is a subject of inquiry which can on no account be neglected.

3. The art of war, then, is governed by five constant factors, to be taken into account in one's deliberations, when seeking to determine the conditions obtaining in the field.

4. These are: (1) The Moral Law; (2) Heaven; (3) Earth; (4) The Commander; (5) Method and discipline.

5,6. The Moral Law causes the people to be in complete accord with their ruler, so that they will follow him regardless of their lives, undismayed by any danger.

7. Heaven signifies night and day, cold and heat, times and seasons.

8. Earth comprises distances, great and small; danger and security; open ground and narrow passes; the chances of life and death.

9. The Commander stands for the virtues of wisdom, sincerely, benevolence, courage and strictness.

10. By method and discipline are to be understood the marshaling of the army in its proper subdivisions, the graduations of rank among the officers, the maintenance of roads by which supplies may reach the army, and the control of military expenditure.

11. These five heads should be familiar to every general: he who knows them will be victorious; he who knows them not will fail.

12. Therefore, in your deliberations, when seeking to determine the military conditions, let them be made the basis of a comparison, in this wise:--

13. (1) Which of the two sovereigns is imbued with the Moral law? (2) Which of the two generals has most ability? (3) With whom lie the advantages derived from Heaven and Earth? (4) On which side is discipline most rigorously enforced? (5) Which army is stronger? (6) On which side are officers and men more highly trained? (7) In which army is there the greater constancy both in reward and punishment?

14. By means of these seven considerations I can forecast victory or defeat.

15. The general that hearkens to my counsel and acts upon it, will conquer: let such a one be retained in command! The general that hearkens not to my counsel nor acts upon it, will suffer defeat:--let such a one be dismissed!

16. While heading the profit of my counsel, avail yourself also of any helpful circumstances over and beyond the ordinary rules.

17. According as circumstances are favorable, one should modify one's plans.

18. All warfare is based on deception.

19. Hence, when able to attack, we must seem unable; when using our forces, we must seem inactive; when we are near, we must make the enemy believe we are far away; when far away, we must make him believe we are near.

20. Hold out baits to entice the enemy. Feign disorder, and crush him.

21. If he is secure at all points, be prepared for him. If he is in superior strength, evade him.

22. If your opponent is of choleric temper, seek to irritate him. Pretend to be weak, that he may grow arrogant.

23. If he is taking his ease, give him no rest. If his forces are united, separate them.

24. Attack him where he is unprepared, appear where you are not expected.

25. These military devices, leading to victory, must not be divulged beforehand.

26. Now the general who wins a battle makes many calculations in his temple ere the battle is fought. The general who loses a battle makes but few calculations beforehand. Thus do many calculations lead to victory, and few calculations to defeat: how much more no calculation at all! It is by attention to this point that I can foresee who is likely to win or lose.

II. Waging War

1. Sun Tzu said: In the operations of war, where there are in the field a thousand swift chariots, as many heavy chariots, and a hundred thousand mail-clad soldiers, with provisions enough to carry them a thousand li, the expenditure at home and at the front, including entertainment of guests, small items such as glue and paint, and sums spent on chariots and armor, will reach the total of a thousand ounces of silver per day. Such is the cost of raising an army of 100,000 men.

2. When you engage in actual fighting, if victory is long in coming, then men's weapons will grow dull and their ardor will be damped. If you lay siege to a town, you will exhaust your strength.

3. Again, if the campaign is protracted, the resources of the State will not be equal to the strain.

4. Now, when your weapons are dulled, your ardor damped, your strength exhausted and your treasure spent, other chieftains will spring up to take advantage of your extremity. Then no man, however wise, will be able to avert the consequences that must ensue.

5. Thus, though we have heard of stupid haste in war, cleverness has never been seen associated with long delays.

6. There is no instance of a country having benefited from prolonged warfare.

7. It is only one who is thoroughly acquainted with the evils of war that can thoroughly understand the profitable way of carrying it on.

8. The skillful soldier does not raise a second levy, neither are his supply-wagons loaded more than twice.

9. Bring war material with you from home, but forage on the enemy. Thus the army will have food enough for its needs.

10. Poverty of the State exchequer causes an army to be maintained by contributions from a distance. Contributing to maintain an army at a distance causes the people to be impoverished.

11. On the other hand, the proximity of an army causes prices to go up; and high prices cause the people's substance to be drained away.

12. When their substance is drained away, the peasantry will be afflicted by heavy exactions.

13,14. With this loss of substance and exhaustion of strength, the homes of the people will be stripped bare, and three-tenths of their income will be dissipated; while government expenses for broken chariots, worn-out horses, breast-plates and helmets, bows and arrows, spears and shields, protective mantles, draught-oxen and heavy wagons, will amount to four-tenths of its total revenue.

15. Hence a wise general makes a point of foraging on the enemy. One cartload of the enemy's provisions is equivalent to twenty of one's own, and likewise a single picul of his provender is equivalent to twenty from one's own store.

16. Now in order to kill the enemy, our men must be roused to anger; that there may be advantage from defeating the enemy, they must have their rewards.

17. Therefore in chariot fighting, when ten or more chariots have been taken, those should be rewarded who took the first. Our own flags should be substituted for those of the enemy, and the chariots mingled and used in conjunction with ours. The captured soldiers should be kindly treated and kept.

18. This is called, using the conquered foe to augment one's own strength.

19. In war, then, let your great object be victory, not lengthy campaigns.

20. Thus it may be known that the leader of armies is the arbiter of the people's fate, the man on whom it depends whether the nation shall be in peace or in peril.
 
Upvote 0

USincognito

a post by Alan Smithee
Site Supporter
Dec 25, 2003
42,058
16,810
Dallas
✟870,771.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Many tactics it contains are outdated due to the technology used in modern warfare. Some of the general principles of conducting war are still pertinent.

That's what I felt. But some of the tactics such as the use of gongs, drums and flags translate into principles of Command, Control and Communications applicable today.

I have a copy by Samuel B. Griffith first published in 1963 and in the introduction he notes that no translations up to when he wrote it (1960) were satisfactory (including Giles). I found some of the actual content of Art of War to be a bit repetative, but it was quite interesting and the insertions by latter commentators along with footnotes helped clarify some things that didn't translate redily.

I really enjoyed the first 60 pages of this edition because it discussed who Sun Tzu was, war in the time he wrote, the political situation in that time, a chapter discussing how Mao Tse-Tung had used Sun Tzu's writings as inspiration plus other content.

It also includes two appendicies with Wu Chi's Art of War, Sun Tzu's influence on the Japanese military. And two appendicies discussing translations of Sun Tzu and biographies of the commentators in Art of War.

My paperback edition does not appear to be availible on Amazon.com, but a hardbound illustrated version with much the same content is.
http://www.amazon.com/Illustrated-A..._bbs_sr_1/002-3329643-0824022?ie=UTF8&s=books
 
Upvote 0
S

Steezie

Guest
Many tactics it contains are outdated due to the technology used in modern warfare. Some of the general principles of conducting war are still pertinent.
Not necessarily true.

Some passages have to be interpreted into today's world but that doesnt make them any less valid. I can only think of a small handfull of passages that no longer have any relevance or use to the modern world.
 
Upvote 0

USincognito

a post by Alan Smithee
Site Supporter
Dec 25, 2003
42,058
16,810
Dallas
✟870,771.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Not necessarily true.

Some passages have to be interpreted into today's world but that doesnt make them any less valid. I can only think of a small handfull of passages that no longer have any relevance or use to the modern world.

I'm reading over Chapter V (Energy) right now and it seems more like a Buddhist sermon than something practical on a tactical or strategic level today.
 
Upvote 0
S

Steezie

Guest
I'm reading over Chapter V (Energy) right now and it seems more like a Buddhist sermon than something practical on a tactical or strategic level today.
Chapter Eight said:
There are not more than five musical notes, yet the combinations of these five give rise to more melodies than can ever be heard.

There are not more than five primary colors (blue, yellow, red, white, and black), yet in combination they produce more hues than can ever been seen.

There are not more than five cardinal tastes (sour, acrid, salt, sweet, bitter), yet combinations of them yield more flavors than can ever be tasted.

In battle, there are not more than two methods of attack--the direct and the indirect; yet these two in combination give rise to an endless series of maneuvers.

Seems pretty clear to me, most of this stuff you DO have to sit there and think about but its far from irrelevant
 
Upvote 0

USincognito

a post by Alan Smithee
Site Supporter
Dec 25, 2003
42,058
16,810
Dallas
✟870,771.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Seems pretty clear to me, most of this stuff you DO have to sit there and think about but its far from irrelevant

(this is a verbal pun)
"I think cones are better suited for directing traffic than teaching" ;)

I didn't say it wasn't clear (the gradiants between definative color spectums is an analogy used quite often in the Creation & Evolution debate when discussing transitional species), I said it didn't contain practical advice. Knowing that I have myriad options for taking an enemy position doesn't tell me whether infantry, armor, artillery (itself usuable directly or indirectly) or tactical or strategic bombing is most appropriate.

As I noted in my longer post above, even some of the most archaic content can give insight but those first 11 verses of Chapter V just seemed a bit esoteric for me. Meh, maybe I've watched the scene in Master Killer where San Te enters the 35th Chamber before he's ready. :)
 
Upvote 0
S

Steezie

Guest
I said it didn't contain practical advice. Knowing that I have myriad options for taking an enemy position doesn't tell me whether infantry, armor, artillery (itself usuable directly or indirectly) or tactical or strategic bombing is most appropriate.
The passage basically means that the best strategy is a combination of everything you have. So instead of JUST using armor and artillery, you use a combination of armor, infantry, and artillery. This is a cornerstone of modern organized warfare

The basic units are the same today as they were in Sun Tzu's day. The only addition we really have is air power.

Tanks are represented by mounted warriors. Infantry represented by swordsmen and spearmen on the ground. And artillery represented by archers (or later cannons)

Its a testament to Tzu's tactical brilliance that thousand of years later, probabaly 95% of what he complied is still viable and in use.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

USincognito

a post by Alan Smithee
Site Supporter
Dec 25, 2003
42,058
16,810
Dallas
✟870,771.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
When I went through Field Artillery Officer Basic Course in 1991 we still applied a warfighting theory called Combined Arms Doctrine. Trust me, I know how theoretical ideas are applied to warfare and as I've said several times know, I think most of Art of War is brilliant and timeless. But can you unstand the difference between theoretical and practical (as in putting into practice)?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums