I have a question. What language was the New Testament written in? Here's one thought Greek. Why? Because only 3 books in the New Testament were written for a Jewish audience who by the way could speak Greek as evident from it permeation into the culture of its day. Or another view is that it was in Aramaic. Why? Because that was the common language of the world at that time.
At best three books were written in Hebrew and that is a far stretch because of the use of non-Jewish sources. Now are we to honestly believe that when Luke penned the name in Greek that he was not writting of Savior. Are we to understand that the message the early church preached as recorded by Luke in Acts and the words of Paul which were guarded by devout men of faith throughout the world are false.
That is preposterous. That is ridiculous. Why don't we just admit then that the entire New Testament is a fallacy because a minority opinion of modern scholarship which I am yet to see a respected linguistic artist verify to be believed over every piece of written literature from Christians is inaccurate write down to the epistles of Paul.
If anyone thinks this is a little to hard to believe I agree with you. Not only is it illogical it is not it is based on a premise that cannot be authenticated by any evidence of any kind.
Also to remark on the NT as being part of the Dead Sea Scrolls that is wrong. The closest thing to the NT in the Dead Sea Scrolls is literature from Jewish Apocaliptic writtings. On a more interesting note the Dead Sea Scrolls contains a 151st Psalm. It is nothing to get excited over it just doesn't fit the Psalms and has been rejected. Still it was an interesting experience to witness.
At best three books were written in Hebrew and that is a far stretch because of the use of non-Jewish sources. Now are we to honestly believe that when Luke penned the name in Greek that he was not writting of Savior. Are we to understand that the message the early church preached as recorded by Luke in Acts and the words of Paul which were guarded by devout men of faith throughout the world are false.
That is preposterous. That is ridiculous. Why don't we just admit then that the entire New Testament is a fallacy because a minority opinion of modern scholarship which I am yet to see a respected linguistic artist verify to be believed over every piece of written literature from Christians is inaccurate write down to the epistles of Paul.
If anyone thinks this is a little to hard to believe I agree with you. Not only is it illogical it is not it is based on a premise that cannot be authenticated by any evidence of any kind.
Also to remark on the NT as being part of the Dead Sea Scrolls that is wrong. The closest thing to the NT in the Dead Sea Scrolls is literature from Jewish Apocaliptic writtings. On a more interesting note the Dead Sea Scrolls contains a 151st Psalm. It is nothing to get excited over it just doesn't fit the Psalms and has been rejected. Still it was an interesting experience to witness.
Upvote
0