isshinwhat

Pro Deo et Patria
Apr 12, 2002
8,338
624
Visit site
✟13,555.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
The account of this collection of the Koran has reached us in several substantially identical forms, and goes back to Zaid himself. According to it, he collected the revelations from copies written on flat stones, pieces of leather, ribs of palm-leaves (not palm-leaves themselves), and such-like material, ,but chiefly “from’ the breasts of men,” i.e. from their memory. From these he wrote a fair copy, which he gave to Abu Bekr, from whom it came to his successor Omar, who again bequeathed it to his daughter IJaf~a, one of the widows of the Prophet. This redaction, commonly called al-~oizof (“ the leaves “), had from the first no canonical authority; and its internal arrangement can only be conjectured.

The Moslems were as far as ever from possessing a uniform text of the Koran. The bravest of their warriors sometimes knew deplorably little about it; distinction on that field they cheerfully accorded to pious men like Ibn Mas’ud. It was inevitable, however, that discrepancies should emerge between the texts of professed scholars, and as these men in their several localities were authorities on the reading of the Koran, quarrels began to break out between the levies from different districts about the true form of the sacred book. During a campaign in A.H. 30 (A.D. 65o—651), Ijodhaifa, the victor in the great and decisive battle of Nehäveand (see CALIPHATE; and PERSIA: History) perceived that such disputes might become dangerous, and therefore urged on the caliph Othmgn the necessity for a universally binding text. The matter was entrusted to Zaid, who had made the former collection, with three leading Korei[wash my mouth][wash my mouth][wash my mouth][wash my mouth]es. These brought together as many copies as they could lay their hands on, and prepared an edition which was to be canonical for all Moslems. To prevent any further disputes, they burned all the other codices except that of ljaf~a, which, however, was soon afterwards destroyed by Merwgn the governor of Medina. The destruction of the earlier codices was an irreparable loss to criticism; but, for the essentially political object of putting an end to controversies by admitting only one form of the common book of religion and of law, this measure was necessary.

The result of these labours is in our hands; as to how they were conducted we have no trustworthy information, tradition being here too much under the influence of dogmatic presuppositions. The critical methods of a modern scientific commission will not be expected of an age when the highest literary education for an Arab consisted in ability to read and write. It now appears highly probable that this second redaction took this simple form:

Zaid read off from the codex which he had previously written, and his associates, simultaneously or successively, wrote one ~opy each to his dictation. These three manuscripts will therefore be those which the caliph, according to trustworthy tradition, sent in the first instance as standard copies to Damascus, Basra and Kufa to the warriors of the provinces of which these were the capitals, while he retained one at Medina. Be that as it may, it is impossible now to distinguish in the present form of the book what belongs to the first redaction from what is due to the second.

The 1911 Encyclopedia

A·bu-Bakr Pronunciation Key (äb-bäkr) also A·bu Bekr (äb bkr), 573-634.

First caliph of the Muslim empire (632-634). Ascending to power after the death of his son-in-law Muhammad, he made Islam a political and military force throughout Arabia.

Source: The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company.

Neal
 
Upvote 0
Originally posted by s0uljah
LOL, these "scientific facts" are so vague. Besides, Mohammed read the Bible to come up with this stuff in the first place. :D

If u read the site a bit , you'd see that it isn't vague..
Anyway , so u think Prophet Muhammad copied his future scientific facts from the bible?
But Prophet Muhammad couldn't read , So where did he get all this knowledge from then ? :eek:
 
Upvote 0

isshinwhat

Pro Deo et Patria
Apr 12, 2002
8,338
624
Visit site
✟13,555.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/

I apologize for omitting the link.

I used an older source to avoid any anti-Islamic bias that may have crept in during the last 10-20 years.  The article I posted comes from the 1911 Edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica.  I just cut and pasted the title, but I didn't do a very good job! ;)

Neal
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
Originally posted by Muslimah


But Prophet Muhammad couldn't read , So where did he get all this knowledge from then ? :eek:

Now, I think other people added to it as they saw fit, and different versions appeared throughout time, using the Bible for parts of it.
 
Upvote 0

Zico

Alhamdu Lillahi Rabbil Alameen
Jun 24, 2002
241
1
48
Kuwait
Visit site
✟578.00
Faith
Muslim
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
Hey souljah,,

One more time.... When is a book an 'inspired' book? http://wings.buffalo.edu/sa/muslim/library/jesus-say/ch2.4.html

Why is it that you only see what you want to see? Is it your mind asking questions now or is it because of ignorance??????

Some samples of Contradictions:

Matthew 27:5 (Judas hangs himself) ..... Acts 1:18 (Judas falls headlong, his bowels gush)

Acts 9:26-29 and Acts 26:19-21(Paul is saved)...... Galatians 1:15-22(Was he really?)

Acts 9:7(heard voice, saw no man)...... Acts 22:9(no voice, saw light)

Matthew 11:13-14,17:13 (Elias is John the Baptist)....... John 1:21 (Elias is not John the Baptist)

Luke 3:23-31 + Romans 1:3 ("according to the flesh" 41 men between Jesus and David)......... Matthew 1:6-16 + Romans 1:3 ("according to the flesh" 26 men between Jesus and David)

Matthew 21:12-18 (temple before passing fig tree) ...... Mark 11:12-15 (temple After passing fig tree)

Matthew 20:20-21 (The mother of the Zebedee's sons makes the request) ...... Mark 10:35-37 (The Zebedee's sons make the request themselves)

Romans 5:12 Adam alone was responsible for the "original sin." ..... Timothy 2:14 eve alone, and not Adam, was responsible for the "original sin"

Genesis 22:1: "And it came to pass after these things, that God did tempt Abraham." ...... James 1:13: "Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of God; for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man."

Matthew 8:5: The centurion came in person ....... Luke 7:3 The centurion sent elders of the Jews


And the list goes on and on, just follow the link and see http://wings.buffalo.edu/sa/muslim/library/jesus-say/ch2.2.html


I'm not trying to sell you islam or any thing here you should do your soul searching on your own, but rest assured,, these are not the words spoken by Jesus Christ the son of Mary*pbut* .

PS. this page contains stories of reverts to islam from all faiths ( although mainly Christians ). They are normal typical people just like you and me and all the guys here and from all walks of life. From priests to doctors to simple people, pick random stories and find out for your self what did they find in islam that wasn't there in thier former religions, see for your self why women and young western girls are starving to cover their hair and wear modest clothes. it's not just like eg. yesterday i dreamt of Jesus .... or he spoke to my heart .... or my muslim country opressed me....... this is something else,,, this is something that puts God Almighty and his messengers each in his proper place and solves the jigsaw puzzle http://www.thetruereligion.org/converts.htm
 
Upvote 0

bouncer

Senior Member
May 30, 2002
740
13
42
Canada
Visit site
✟1,032.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Originally posted by Zico

Hey souljah,,

One more time.... When is a book an 'inspired' book? ttp://wings.buffalo.edu/sa/muslim/library/jesus-say/ch2.4.html">http://wings.buffalo.edu/sa/muslim/...-say/ch2.4.html

Why is it that you only see what you want to see? Is it your mind asking questions now or is it because of ignorance??????

We could put this very question to you !

First off, the link you put up, starts with a verse from Deutronomy, which is in the old testament of the Bible. For an article basically refuting the authority of the Bible, it is interesting that they chose to use a verse from the same book that they are attacking to give weight to their arguments.....

Also, the trueness of the Bible is not something, 'ignorant' lay christians believe. Here is a link by a few christian 'scholars' on why the Bible is inspired and genuine.....

CAN WE TRUST THE GOSPELS?

All the contradictions you just named can easily be answered satisfactorily when taken in the right context. Besides, the Bible is a book with writings of many different authors. There is bound to be some differences.

On the other hand, I can also point you to some alleged Quranic contradictions here...

CONTRADICTIONS IN THE QURAN

And the Quran is supposed to be the very words of GOD. Is it even possible for mere humans like us to find 'apparent' contradictions in Gods words? But I dont expect you to give up Islam on the basis of these just yet.

In the same way, dont expect a lot of Christians to change just by pushing a list of contradictions down their throats.

I know a lot of Christians are ignorant of Islam and its teachings, like I was and probably still am. But I have done my research and soul searching, and probably you need to do some too..... 
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
"Christians and Muslims share many beliefs in common. Both accept only one God, the Creator and Source of all Revelation, the Merciful Judge who will punish the wicked and reward the good. With materialism gaining the upper hand and in many parts of the world, it is important that believers stress what they have in common rather than intensify mutual opposition. This means that unfounded prejudice on both sides should be removed. In February 1976, 1200 delegates from sixty countries took part in a seminar on `Islamic-Christian Dialogue'. The Christians asked the Muslims to make a deeper study of the New Testament and to drop the charge of falsification. Dialogue requires that each party accepts the authenticity of the other person's Scriptures on which his faith is based.13

Many of the great Muslim thinkers have, indeed, accepted the authenticity of the New Testament text. Listing the names of these men seems a fitting conclusion to this essay. Their testimony proves that Christian-Muslim dialogue need not for ever be stymied by the allegation introduced by Ibn-Khazem. Two great historians, Al-Mas'udi (died 956) and Ibn-Khaldun (died 1406), held the authenticity of the Gospel text. Four well-known theologians agreed with this: Ali at-Tabari (died 855), Qasim al-Khasani (died 860), 'Amr al-Ghakhiz (died 869) and, last but not least, the famous Al-Ghazzali (died 1111).14 Their view is shared by Abu Ali Husain Ibn Sina, who is known in the West as Avicenna (died 1037). Bukhari (died 870), who acquired a great name by his collection of early traditions, quoted the Qur'an itself (Sura 3:72,78) to prove that the text of the Bible was not falsified.15 Finally, Muhammad Abduh Sayyid Ahmad Khan, a religious and social reformer of modem times (died 1905), accepted the findings of modern science. He said:

As far as the text of the Bible is concerned. it has not been altered ... No attempt was made to present a diverging text as the authentic one.16
May God be praised for the witness of these honest men.
"
http://answering-islam.org/Bible/Text/wijngaards.html
 
Upvote 0

lared

Well-Known Member
May 27, 2002
936
12
Visit site
✟1,291.00
The Moslem religion has displayed itself to be very, very wicked. How utterly disgusting.....the suicide bombers, the payment to the families, the matyrdom of them. And what does the Moslem religious clergy do or say? Nothing but subtle encouragement of such offensive activity.

On the other hand, christendom is also very, very wicked. How it tolerated its people to exploit others around the world is sickening. The clergy of christendom is blood guilty for millions of lives that have been slaughtered.

True Christianity, though, based upon such teachings as that as found at Matthew 5:43,44: "YOU heard that it was said, 'You must love your neighbor and hate your enemy.' 44 However, I say to YOU: Continue to love YOUR enemies and to pray for those persecuting YOU;"..........is what is righteous.
 
Upvote 0
Souljah,

Where in the Gospels does it say that Jesus said he was God?

I've puzzled over this question for many years, and have never found a passage that supports that he said he was God. Nor, in all my years of parochial school education or later Bible Study have I heard it.

Thanks,

Patty
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Havoc

Celtic Witch
Jul 26, 2002
4,652
91
61
Realityville
Visit site
✟14,135.00
Faith
Pagan
Lared:
If we follow that train of thought one step further then we come to the Idea that true Islam is also based on teachings that encourage loving one's fellow man, respecting the rights of others, being honest and trustworthy, etc. etc.

Mainstream, grass roots, Islam is not much different from mainstream, grassroots Christianity, or mainstream grassroots Judeism in what it considers to be proper conduct and behaviour. This is not surprising since all three worship the God of "our Father Abraham".

As you have pointed out there have been violent extremeists in Islam in both individuals or Governmet just as there have been violent extremeists in Christianity in both individuals and Government. Christians have asked not to be judged by the actions of those extremeists and so should you not judge the Moslems by the actions of a few Extremeists.

Havoc
Havoc
 
Upvote 0