frist of all I am sorry if it seems like I am coming on to strong.
Seocodly hear a link
http://www.inappropriate contentdestroyswomen.org/
http://www.oneangrygirl.net/antiinappropriate content.html
Alright I did not mean to sound like I was attacking you I was just trying to make a point and I dont think you will still have the same thoughts whean you do have a kid.
inappropriate contentdestroyswomen.org said:
Regular users of inappropriate contentography are more likely to think of women in stereotype, (1) as "socially non-discriminating, as hysterically euphoric in response to just about any sexual or pseudosexual stimulation, and as eager to accommodate seemingly any and every sexual request.
---
Regular users of inappropriate contentography are more likely to have sexually callous attitudes and accept the rape myth (that when a woman says "no," she means "yes.")
---
Regular users of inappropriate contentography have increasingly hostile and aggressive sexual fantasies.
At one point we thought these were true. However, a former classmate, and current contemporary of mine did his PhD dissertation on the subject and found that they are actually untrue. It may be that at one time it was true, and now it isn't, or it may be that the research was bad. The bottom line is that it isn't true now. It should also be noted that there is a significant problem of causation in these three assertions. In fact, it seems rather likely that those people with more aggressive sexual fantasies, who subscribe to the rape myth, or have stereotypes toward women that are more likely to seek out inappropriate content regularly.
inappropriate contentdestroyswomen.org said:
Regular users of inappropriate contentography are less likely to convict for a rape, and less likely to give a harsh sentence to a rapist if in fact convicted. (5) Conversely, individuals who do not use inappropriate contentography are more likely to convict an accused rapist.
I can't comment on this directly, but it would seem to to fall under the same category as the above.
inappropriate contentdestroyswomen.org said:
Areas with inappropriate contentography outlets and sexually oriented businesses experience significantly higher sexual offenses and property crimes than areas without such businesses.
This may be true, but it also has to be recognized that many cities (including my community, which is why I know) have municipal ordinance which restrict where these stores can operate. For instance, in my community the ordinance says that these stores cannot operate within 1 km of a residential area, or school area. That means these stores can only be operated in urban, or industrial areas, which is where the majority of crime, and property damage occurs. So again, we have the causation problem.
inappropriate contentdestroyswomen.org said:
Clinical research shows that inappropriate contentographic images create chemically encoded messages on the brain that can remain through adulthood. Human memory is formed in part by the release of the chemical epinephrine which, upon emotional arousal, leaves behind an imprint on the brain.
I'm not sure what the point of this is. So does sex (actual sex). So does chocolate. So does coffee.
I'm going to change the next one to make a point...
While spending three evenings watching violent movies, viewers became progressively less bothered by violence in general. Compared to others who were not exposed to the films, the also, three days later, expressed less sympathy for domestic violence victims and they related the victims' injuries as less severe.
This is a problem with violent movies in general, and not necessarily erotic movies specifically.
The real issue with inappropriate contentography, is that some lower budget adult entertainment companies do physically, mentally, and sexually abuse women, and often young girls. They illegally import immigrants, and then force them into the sex trade in general. Others prey upon homeless women, and girls, and manipulate them into the trade. These women are not offered basic protection, fair wages, or adequate living conditions.
Most of such companies operate outside the designated adult entertainment union, which not surprisingly is working to reduce and eliminate these problems. These practices are not generalized throughout the industry, but do exist, and are certainly unethical. Of course, similar practices exist in other trades including construction, and service industries.
