Hi Michael, thanks for your challenging comments and questions...
You are surely welcome. God bless you for your calm and patience.
Genesis 3:4-5, "And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die: For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil."
It is wrongly assumed that the serpent here is an angel that had sinned, called "Satan". Having been thrown out of heaven for his sin, he came to earth and tempted Eve to sin. The passage talks about "the serpent." The words "satan" and "devil" do not occur in the whole of the book of Genesis. The characters involved in the Genesis record of the fall of man are: God, Adam, Eve and the serpent. Nobody else is mentioned. There is no evidence that anything got inside the serpent to make it do what it did. Paul says, "the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty" (2 Corinthians 11:3) - notice that Paul doesn't mention the "devil" beguiling Eve.
But Franklin, why would God create a creature specifically to cause man to sin? That would be like God tempted man, hence contradicting James 1:13. You still have not answered my other challenges as to the large number of references to the devil in the New Testament. If I am to believe that Satan is not real, then can you explain who this "Satan" was that God talked to in the book of Job? Who is this "Satan" in 1 Chronicles 21:1? Who is this "Satan" in Zechariah 3? Often the term "accuser" is used to mean "Satan". Can not "serpent" mean the same?
Well, you said yourself that you agreed that God didn't create us with a sinful nature right? Now I ask you, why would God choose to create us with a sinful nature? That just doesn't make any sence. The nature of sin, the nature of justice, and the nature of God are such that it is impossible for men to be born sinners. First, sin is voluntary, second, sin is not a substance, and third, sin is a responsible choice.
I am confused here. I said God did not create man with a sinful nature. However, I did say that man was created with a free will, with the possibility to sin. Otherwise, God created automatons that follow Him, which God clearly does not want, otherwise there would be no such thing as faith, grace, justification, etc.
I've listened to Sproul a number of times, his insight on the Olivet Discourse is somewhat interesting, however, I don't see where his views are any different than the futurists and the dispensationalists. I think he labels himself as a partial preterist because of his view of the fall of the Jewish age in AD70. Most dispensationalist will take that position also. The thousand years you are referring to is symbolic of completeness and not a literal thousand years as traditionally taught by futurists
Franklin, you make those comments like they leave a bad taste in your mouth. Do you believe that non-preterists or partial preterists are not true Christians?
In Christ,
Michael
Upvote
0