Darwinian Sects, Lies and Evolutionists

Ever been to Monterey Park CA, where it's like 80% Chinese? How about Alhambra or Arcadia, CA, or Chinatown in L.A.? There's a lot of Chinese living in the U.S.!

My closest friends are all non-Christian Chinese and I've simply asked them what the symbols mean and they've all confirmed the obvious with no hesitation. Just a simple, yes, that's what the individual symbols mean.

It's not that hard to find out. The language is only read by billions of people! That's all, and some of them live here in the U.S.!

It's like asking an English speaker if the letters b, i, r and d are in the word "bird." Indeed they are.

Irrefutable stuff.
 
Upvote 0
Originally posted by Cyclo Rider

"Biology" isn't a religion, but evolution fundamentalist belief in Darwinism qualifies as one and will in time.

"Evolution fundamentalist belief in Darwinism" might be a religon, but I know of no one who practices it, even among evolutionists.

Evolution is part of biology and is so well supported that no more belief is required in it as is required by gravity or a round earth. In fact, "nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution" (Population Geneticist and Christian, Theodosius Dobzhansky).

Now if you still want to incist that evolution is a religion, please describe its rituals, beliefs, holy texts, holidays, hierachy, preisthood, history, various sects, etc.

If it truely is a religion, you should be able to answer most of those. Until you do so, your comments hold no weight.
 
Upvote 0
Originally posted by Jerry Smith
It is the organized grass roots attack on science
No, it's an organized grass roots effort to debunk an atheistic faith being taught as science and the swindlers that promote it.

The fundamentalist Darwinian evolutionists have been attacking the integrity of science for years by indoctrinating children with the belief that their ancestors include a species of fish, amphibian, reptile, rodent, and primate--in that order--with several funky transitional forms inbetween each stage.

That's not science. That's Darwinian faith.
 
Upvote 0

chickenman

evil unamerican
May 8, 2002
1,376
7
41
Visit site
✟9,874.00
"That's not science. That's Darwinian faith."

baseless claims by a non scientist. Quite frankly, who are you to determine what science is or is not. The majority of biologists, people who do science for a living, realise the validity of evolution as a scientific theory. Should they bow down to the likes of yourself, simply because you don't agree with them?
 
Upvote 0
Originally posted by npetreley


I'll do better than that! I'll give you the evidence the evolution way.

Fossil evidence of the tooth fairy.

tooth.gif


Artist's conception of the tooth fairy, based on the above fossil.

fairy.gif


There you have it. Irrefutable proof of the tooth fairy.

Admittedly, people have tried to discredit this conclusion by claiming this is actually the correct tooth for Lucy, not the tooth fairy.

But we educated scientists know for a fact that, at the very least, the tooth fairy and this tooth share common ancestry. Both of these pictures share certain traits, like colors, and the characters in the URL have similar patterns or exact replicas, such as "http."

Yep. That's the logic of a typical Darwinian evolutionist fundamentalist alright.

I recall the words of a French scientist, "evolution is a fairy tale for adults."
 
Upvote 0
Originally posted by Cyclo Rider

No, it's an organized grass roots effort to debunk an atheistic faith being taught as science and the swindlers that promote it.

For starters, "atheistic faith" is an oxymoron.

The fundamentalist Darwinian evolutionists have been attacking the integrity of science for years by indoctrinating children with the belief that their ancestors include a species of fish, amphibian, reptile, rodent, and primate--in that order--with several funky transitional forms inbetween each stage.

How is using evidence to produce well supported theories an attack on the integrity of science?

That's not science. That's Darwinian faith.

:rolleyes:
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
Originally posted by Cyclo Rider


Yep. That's the logic of a typical Darwinian evolutionist fundamentalist alright.

I recall the words of a French scientist, "evolution is a fairy tale for adults."

Yeap that is a typical Creationist argument: high on rhetoric and emotion, low on accuracy and facts.
 
Upvote 0
Originally posted by RufusAtticus
For starters, "atheistic faith" is an oxymoron.

Do you trust your conclusion that there is no god? That's faith. It is not an oxymoron at all.

Agnostic faith might be an example of an oxymoron, however.

Originally posted by RufusAtticus
How is using evidence to produce well supported theories an attack on the integrity of science?

It depends on what you mean by well supported. If you mean you are using interpretations of evidence to produce a theory, and it is well supported because it is generally accepted, then it could be a vicious attack on the integrity of science. Evolution, for example, is well supported in that it is generall accepted in spite of it being unscientific.

If you mean it is supported by observation and repeatability, then I don't see how it would be an attack on the integrity of science.
 
Upvote 0

Plan 9

Absolutely Elsewhere
Jul 7, 2002
9,024
686
71
Deck Six, Cargo Bay Two; apply to Annabel Lee to l
Visit site
✟20,357.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Private
Originally posted by Cyclo Rider

I recall the words of a French scientist, "evolution is a fairy tale for adults."

Clyclo Rider: Which French scientist would this be, please? 
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
Originally posted by RufusAtticus
Evolution fundamentalist might be a religon, but I know of no one who practices it, even among evolutionists.
People just practice the rotten fruit resulting from the belief system. The Nazis practiced its fruits. So did the Communists. So do the folks at the "Natural Law"-based World Church of the Creator.


Evolution is part of biology and is so well supported that no more belief is required in it as is required by gravity or a round earth.
Only in the mind of the evolution fundamentalists and their wacky assumptions. Consider the belief that reptiles change into mammals, fish with fins into amphibians with legs, land mammals with legs into whales with flippers, and you have a bizarre faith system.

bacteria -> fish -> amphibian -> reptile -> rodent -> primate -> human

That's a faith. Not part of biology. Biology should deal with science, not faith.


Now if you still want to incist that evolution is a religion, please describe its rituals, beliefs, holy texts, holidays, hierachy, preisthood, history, various sects, etc.
The World Church of the Creator is off to a start. There's a whole pandora's box of evil that is opened with Darwinist interpretations of "Natural Law."
 
Upvote 0
From talkorigins, the evolutionist bible...

Jean Rostand, the fellow who said, "Transformism [evolution] is a fairy tale for adults,"

Talkorigins also goes on to say (as if it means something)...

also wrote that "Transformism may be considered as accepted, and no scientist, no philosopher, no longer discusses [questions - ED.] the fact of evolution." (L'Evolution des Especes [i.e., The Evolution of the Species], Hachette, p. 190).

So what? I would say the same thing. It doesn't mean I accept it as a fact, but that THEY do.

But here's the part that's most fun...talkorigins then goes on to SPECULATE about what Jean Rostand would say about the Bible. Hey, that's what evolutionists do best. Speculate.

Jean Rostand was also an atheist who would have viewed the Biblical account of creation as a "fairy tale for adults."
 
Upvote 0
Originally posted by RufusAtticus
Yeap that is a typical Creationist argument: high on rhetoric and emotion, low on accuracy and facts.
It wasn't an argument, though the creationist arguments are far more convincing and rational.

Creationist argument: Only intelligence can create intelligence.
Evolutionist argument: Non-intelligence can create intelligence.

Creationist argument: Only life can create life.
Evolutionist argument: Non-life can create life.

Which are proven and observable by science?

Moreover, I was agreeing with a most perfect analogy involving evolutionists and belief in the tooth fairy!
 
Upvote 0

chickenman

evil unamerican
May 8, 2002
1,376
7
41
Visit site
✟9,874.00
People just practice the rotten fruit resulting from the belief system. The Nazis practiced its fruits. So did the Communists. So do the folks at the "Natural Law"-based World Church of the Creator.

-now you have absolutely no credibility at all

That's a faith. Not part of biology. Biology should deal with science, not faith.

again the non-scientist makes his pronouncements about what he thinks science is and isn't. Why should I take your word for it, and not the word of richard dawkins, he at least, has studied biology at university level, and participated in scientific research.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
Originally posted by chickenman
it's merely a string of unsupported claims with no evidence to back them up.
You're a liar, but that "goes with the territory", right? I provided evidence on one count and agreed with a superb analogy involving evolutionists finding a tooth and declaring the tooth fairy to be real!

Moreover, it's a popular evolution fundamentalist tactic to simply ignore evidence and hope it goes away, despite mountains of it being available. When presented with an observable scientific fact like the Law of Biogenesis, the evolutionist argues against it saying, "That's not so, because I, well, I said it's not so!"

Ah, the evolution fundamentalists. They believe what they want to believe, in spite of it all.

bacteria -> fish -> amphibian -> reptile -> rodent -> primate -> human

:sick: According to the evolution fundamentalists, it's not a matter of these creatures all existing on earth, it's a matter of we humans having a species of each in OUR ancestry!
 
Upvote 0