I dont mean the Son of God, but consider this....
There is a problem with the world following the AC if he appears to be evil, power-mongering, etc. The minute he tried to destroy the Temple, or require a symbol in peoples palms, set up a one-world government, etc he would be tagged.
But what if he, in his Luciferian mode, poses as a good man, a man of almost unquestionable piety and goodness?
So here is a very hypothetical scenario...
1) If the Shroud of Turin does indeed have the blood of Jesus on it (and they have enough to test it as AB blood type), and...
2) Someone took a sample of this blood and cloned it into a full person, ...
3) who then grew up as any normal person but with a distinguished pedigree and moral instruction along modern theological schools of thought,
4) I have to ask, would a majority of the worlds people suspend their moral judgement about such a person, given his pedigree, aqnd thus giving the AC the space and presumption needed to pull off the things he is 'supposed' to?
There is a problem with the world following the AC if he appears to be evil, power-mongering, etc. The minute he tried to destroy the Temple, or require a symbol in peoples palms, set up a one-world government, etc he would be tagged.
But what if he, in his Luciferian mode, poses as a good man, a man of almost unquestionable piety and goodness?
So here is a very hypothetical scenario...
1) If the Shroud of Turin does indeed have the blood of Jesus on it (and they have enough to test it as AB blood type), and...
2) Someone took a sample of this blood and cloned it into a full person, ...
3) who then grew up as any normal person but with a distinguished pedigree and moral instruction along modern theological schools of thought,
4) I have to ask, would a majority of the worlds people suspend their moral judgement about such a person, given his pedigree, aqnd thus giving the AC the space and presumption needed to pull off the things he is 'supposed' to?