My discoveries on the papacy =)

Status
Not open for further replies.

2002 Christian

Well-Known Member
Mar 12, 2002
402
0
USA
✟897.00
I did a web search using Yahoo for "KJV Popish Persons." That site I linked was the first link from the search. I don't know anything about the site other than that one page. I don't necessarily endorse anything there.

What does "rove" mean? Since I don't know, why don't you rove for me?

Are you threatening me?

Rule No. 4 - No "Offensive" Posts, Links or Images

4) You will not post any messages that are obscene, vulgar, sexually-orientated, hateful, threatening, racist, sexist, discriminatory, satanic or otherwise violative of any local or international laws, or anything that encourages drug use. This includes links in your signature and profile, as well as posted images and avatars. Staff will ultimately decide if something is appropriate or not.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

VOW

Moderator
Feb 7, 2002
6,912
15
71
*displaced* CA, soon to be AZ!
Visit site
✟28,000.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
And folks wonder why the Catholics wanted a separate forum, a place of respite!

Hoonbaba, Hon:

Let's get back to your original discoveries. You've made some wondrous ones!

Take a little walk through the Book of Acts of the Apostles, and look closely when any of the Apostles are mentioned by name.


Peace be with you,
~VOW
 
Upvote 0

Hoonbaba

Catholic Preterist
Apr 15, 2002
1,941
55
43
New Jersey, USA
Visit site
✟10,659.00
Faith
Catholic
Whoa.....this is fascinating!  I just read some of the gospels and Acts.  Here's what I've come across:

Apparently, Matthew places more emphasis on Peter than the other disciples:

Matt 26:35 - But Peter declared, "Even if I have to die with you, I will never disown you." And all the other disciples said the same. (NIV)

Mark 16:7 says something similar:

"But go, tell his disciples and Peter..."

Again, Peter is the one that stands upas he tells the people about Jesus.  Peter is obviously singled out here:

Acts 2:14 says, "Then Peter stood up with the Eleven"

And again:

Acts 2:37 says, "When the people heard this, they were cut to the heart and said to Peter and the other apostles, "Brothers, what shall we do?"

And again:

Acts 5:29 - Peter and the other apostles replied: "We must obey God rather than men!

I also noticed that Peter is with John ministering together in Acts 3-5.  I wonder if there's a reason for that...actually wasn't John considered something like a bishop?  maybe that has something to do with John sending letters to 7 churches (Rev 1:4) =)

God bless!


-Jason
 
Upvote 0

jukesk9

Dixie Whistlin' Papist
Feb 7, 2002
4,046
83
52
Arkansas
Visit site
✟13,223.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
So, my question posed to anyone who wants to respond, is this the first instance where Peter acts with infallibility?

Acts 2:38:

And Peter said to them, "Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.

How do I make my case for this being the first instance?  Christ has ascended into Heaven and has sent the Apostles out to baptize all nations.  Now this may be far fetched (but what's a debate forum for anyway?) BUT....what do some missionaries say when asked about salvation?  They tell you to ask Jesus in your heart, heed the altar call, etc. etc.  These people are asking Peter what must they do to be saved and Peter tells them to A) repent and B) get baptized.  Far different than today's missionaries outside Rome. 

In this verse, you have the Trinity mysteriously present.  How?  All through the Gospels Jesus said to repent because the Kingdom of God the Father is at hand.  Peter says to repent, continuing the message.  That's the first step (to reach the Father).  Then he says be baptized in the name of Jesus, which is the second step (the Son) and thirdly he says you shall receive the Holy Spirit, the third person in the Trinity.  So it's all there in this one verse. 

How many times have we debated with the OSAS who say baptism isn't necessary?  Well, here you have it.  It is.  And declared so by the Vicar of Christ.  Just my .02 cents and I know I could be very wrong. 

Thank you.  I'll be here all week :D
 
Upvote 0

VOW

Moderator
Feb 7, 2002
6,912
15
71
*displaced* CA, soon to be AZ!
Visit site
✟28,000.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
To Hoonbaba:

NOW you are grasping it!

Study of Catholic teachings from Scripture can be compared to a rosebud. The more you seek, the more your eyes and your heart and your mind are opened, like the unfurling of the flower petals.

And my search began with the Scripture where Jesus says to Peter, "You are ROCK, and upon this ROCK I will build My Church."

It's been falling into place like a long string of dominoes for over twenty years for me now!



Peace be with you,
~VOW
 
Upvote 0

seebs

God Made Me A Skeptic
Apr 9, 2002
31,914
1,529
18
Saint Paul, MN
Visit site
✟55,225.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Originally posted by Hoonbaba

Here's why: Protesteants go on to say that 'petros' is basically like a small pebble, like a throwing stone, something insignificant.

FWIW, I was raised Lutheran, and we were always told that it means just what it looks like - Peter was special among the apostles, and Christ was making a pun.

We've known for hundreds of years (since the discovery of the duck-billed platypus) that God has a sense of humor. Should we be surprised to find that He puns now and again?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Hoonbaba

Catholic Preterist
Apr 15, 2002
1,941
55
43
New Jersey, USA
Visit site
✟10,659.00
Faith
Catholic
Originally posted by seebs


FWIW, I was raised Lutheran, and we were always told that it means just what it looks like - Peter was special among the apostles, and Christ was making a pun.

We've known for hundreds of years (since the discovery of the duck-billed platypus) that God has a sense of humor. Should we be surprised to find that He puns now and again?

I highly doubt it's a pun! LOL! :p

-Jason
 
Upvote 0

Hoonbaba

Catholic Preterist
Apr 15, 2002
1,941
55
43
New Jersey, USA
Visit site
✟10,659.00
Faith
Catholic
Originally posted by jukesk9
So, my question posed to anyone who wants to respond, is this the first instance where Peter acts with infallibility?

Acts 2:38:

And Peter said to them, "Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.

How do I make my case for this being the first instance?  Christ has ascended into Heaven and has sent the Apostles out to baptize all nations.  Now this may be far fetched (but what's a debate forum for anyway?) BUT....what do some missionaries say when asked about salvation?  They tell you to ask Jesus in your heart, heed the altar call, etc. etc.  These people are asking Peter what must they do to be saved and Peter tells them to A) repent and B) get baptized.  Far different than today's missionaries outside Rome. 

In this verse, you have the Trinity mysteriously present.  How?  All through the Gospels Jesus said to repent because the Kingdom of God the Father is at hand.  Peter says to repent, continuing the message.  That's the first step (to reach the Father).  Then he says be baptized in the name of Jesus, which is the second step (the Son) and thirdly he says you shall receive the Holy Spirit, the third person in the Trinity.  So it's all there in this one verse. 

How many times have we debated with the OSAS who say baptism isn't necessary?  Well, here you have it.  It is.  And declared so by the Vicar of Christ.  Just my .02 cents and I know I could be very wrong. 

Thank you.  I'll be here all week :D

Hi Jukesk9, I'm in full agreement with you on the Acts 2:23 passage.  But there's many other passages which imply that salvation is done another way.  Here's what I mean:

By Hearing the Gospel & Belief in God: John 5:24: "He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life".

By Baptism: John 3:5: "Jesus answered, ‘I tell you the truth, no one can enter the kingdom of God unless he is born of water and the Spirit.'"

By Grace & Faith, not Works: Ephesians 2:8,9: "For by grace are ye saved through faith…not of works."

By Faith & Works: James 2:17: "Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone." By Keeping the Law: Matthew 19:17: "... if thou wilt enter unto life, keep the commandments."

By Belief in Christ: John 3:16: "…whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life."

By Belief and Baptism:</B> Mark 16:16: "He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned."

By Words: Matthew 12:37: "For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned."

By Calling on the Lord: Acts 2:21: "whoever calls upon the name of the Lord shall be saved."

Not Works but by Grace &amp; Baptism: Titus 3:5: "Not by works…but according to his mercy…by the washing of regeneration." (Note: some denominations will say the washing refers to Christ’s blood and sacrifice.)

I'm not trying to start a debate, but in light of these verses, I'm confused about this 'how does one get saved' thing works.

Can anyone help? =)

Also, what exactly is papal infallibility?&nbsp; Does it mean that the Pope can't screw up when he's speaking?&nbsp; Is the basis for that simply that the Holy Spirit would guide him&nbsp;to proclaim truth?&nbsp; And whether he doesn't/does isn't dependant on papal infallibility?

-Jason
 
Upvote 0

jukesk9

Dixie Whistlin' Papist
Feb 7, 2002
4,046
83
52
Arkansas
Visit site
✟13,223.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Papal infallibility means that the pope is free from error when he defines doctrine. He can make mistakes on other things (like the earth being flat way back when) but when it comes to faith and morals, he is guided by the Holy Spirit.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
Status
Not open for further replies.