Correction, using the example of one thing to follow with the sentiment of "in the same way" does speak on the morality of it.
That is unless you have some way of explaining your claim that it doesn't in addition to an assertion above.
Perhaps that is the issue at hand then.
Claiming that someone or a group is condemning only to do some condemning.
Please speak for yourself.
I wasn't sold on the war in Iraq based on one or two talking points. If that is what your basis was, I can't help you remove the "how" it got there.
Besides, the issue is for me, "Here we are, what to do now".
Abandonment is bad for everyone.
I keep seeing those negative assertions.
I also see an absence of addressing everything else such as violations of UN resolutions, mass graves, known invasion of other countries, known use and possession of WMD, military personnel using civilian clothing while in battle, hospitals, Mosques, schools being used as depots and military installations, and so on and so on and so on...
Perhaps many people may feel confident that they know everything involved enough to "condemn" other many people and claim religious piety in their condemnation of those people, even a nation. But I'll view such actions on a case by case basis and in a light that it deserves.
By the way, I don't even bother with videos during a debate. They are horrible to rebut and media assertions are common in propaganda.
