For those who support the war on drugs

Rize

Well-Known Member
Oct 15, 2002
2,158
14
44
Louisana
✟17,900.00
Faith
Atheist
Politics
US-Libertarian
I'd like to get your opinion on the following linked article. It was published in 1996 by National Review (definitely a conservative magazine) during Clinton's presidency. The article features detailed opinions by 7 relevant people with extensive knowledge of the war on drugs and its consequences. The 7 authors generally do not advocate the complete legalization of drugs, but strongly criticize the opposite extreme (and current policy) of complete prohibition.

If you don't want to read the whole article, note that it is broken into 7 sections (each with a different author). Feel free to read a few sections and comment on those if you like (just let us know which sections you read by number).

http://www.nationalreview.com/12feb96/drug.html

If you read this article and still support the complete prohibition of drugs, I'd like to know what about the article failed to convince you.

If your mind is changed by the article from supporting the current policy to something else, I'd like to know about that too.

For those who already question the sanity of our current drug policy, I would like your opinion on the quality of this article. I would also like your opinion on what you think individuals can do to persuade the people and government to try a different approach.
 

Maynard Keenan

Well-Known Member
Aug 21, 2004
8,470
789
37
Louisville, KY
✟20,085.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
I HATE the war on drugs.

There are so many more important things. Drug offenders get inane penalties, we spend insane amounts of money on stopping drugs....and yet we can't stop them. Many drugs aren't even that harmful (its impossible to make the case the weed is more dangerous to society than alcohol, which is not only legal but almost universally consumed.)
 
Upvote 0

Rize

Well-Known Member
Oct 15, 2002
2,158
14
44
Louisana
✟17,900.00
Faith
Atheist
Politics
US-Libertarian
Maynard Keenan said:
I HATE the war on drugs.

There are so many more important things. Drug offenders get inane penalties, we spend insane amounts of money on stopping drugs....and yet we can't stop them. Many drugs aren't even that harmful (its impossible to make the case the weed is more dangerous to society than alcohol, which is not only legal but almost universally consumed.)

Naturally I agree. I keep finding more and more information about the problem that is the war on drugs. I've yet to find any compelling information in support of continuing prohibition.

Here are some links I've recently been exploring for example:

http://www.drugwardistortions.org/

http://www.drugwarfacts.org/
 
Upvote 0

Vylo

Stick with the King!
Aug 3, 2003
24,732
7,790
43
New Jersey
✟203,465.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
I read a terrific paper that weighed the pro's and con's of legalization once, I will have to see if I can find it again.

One of the biggest problems is that prohibition fails to significantly impact the number of users. It also undermines the authority of the law, since so many are breaking it. The paper went into more detail, and I'm running a fever, so I apologize if this isn't entirely clear.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

nvxplorer

Senior Contributor
Jun 17, 2005
10,569
451
✟20,675.00
Faith
Atheist
Politics
US-Others
quantumspirit said:
How about, instead of all out war, we just take the drug problem on a case by case basis, like any other crime?
Actually, the sane approach would be to treat addiction as a health problem, which it is, and allow responsible users the freedom to live their lives as they please.
 
Upvote 0