All of the basic aspects known about the studies of geology, biology and the conditions of the human psyche that have been found in the evidence of earths past and present history are defined and described by the events in Genesis 1-3 and 6-10, the Genesis account and the Genesis account of the flood. These accounts contain the primary material that the propositions of modern evolution have most strongly attempted to refute and then replace with the ideologies proposed by that theory.
The inclusion of the supernatural in both of these Genesis accounts constitutes the single aspect of the events that scientific cannot address or investigate. The supernatural lies beyond the boundaries and scope of empirical investigation. Aside from this exception, all of the primary observable evidences in the studies of modern biological, geological and the results of the human psychological condition that can be collected by the means of natural observation are identifiable, definable and explainable by the conditions and events described by these two Genesis events.
Primary observable evidence found by natural observation and collection does not include tentative and inconsistent measurement results as those rendered by methods such as radiometric dating or the inconsistent and non-repeatable conclusion based on inconsistent and tentative fossil remains that have been attempted to be interpreted as transitional forms and whose consistent lack of repeatable evidence have caused noted paleontologists to abandon Darwins conclusions of slow and gradual changes of life over long periods of time as a feasible method of explaining the evolution in the past.
The remainder of the presence of natural and observable evidence in the areas of study is present in the events described in the two accounts presented in Genesis.
Because of pervasive negative biases that oppose assertions such as those found in this OP, the recognition of these conclusions as being feasible will not be acknowledged as remotely possible by many individuals, without first engaging in a careful investigation of the information presented in the Genesis accounts and an objective and systematic collection of observable evidence as suggested. If this is done, a conclusion that such possibilities exist will be most probably be reached.
----------------------------------------------------------