LittleRocketBoy said:
I read somewhere the idea that "time" and history actually exist outside of eternity, like a scroll. God can open it and look at any moment in time He desires. I am not sure how that would diseffect faith as a law of creation. Faith is what holds the ages (worlds) together.
If I understand faith, then it is believing in something that, for all intents and purposes has not happened. It is something other than what can be seen (Heb. 11:1; 2 Cor. 5:7; Mark 11:24). If I know the future in exact detail or if I am able to peer into the future to see exactly what is going to happen then I have no need to exercise faith. If the future exists then it cannot be changed because it is. No need for faith for something that already is.
Therefore, if God is able to peer into the future then there is no need for Him to exercise faith. That is a consistent belief and most Arminians and Calvinists are consistent. It is Word-Faithers that I find inconsistent because they want to hold on to both premises. They want god to know the future in exact detail, but they say that He exercises faith. It simply cannot be both. To hold to both is illogical.
LittleRocketBoy said:
Then there is the "hyper faith" concept that everything is being held together by the words spoken before material universe was created.
I have never heard it taught to that extreme. It sounds more like the teaching of "Process Theology" in which they believe that once God created the world, He just stepped back and was no longer involved in it. But then, many these folks also question God's power and other areas of Scripture.
Nonetheless, the Bible does teach that God upholds all things by the Word of His power:
Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds; Who being the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person, and upholding all things by the word of his power, when he had by himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high; (Heb. 1:2, 3)
LittleRocketBoy said:
IOWs, what appears to be "prophecy" is actually a creative statement. The word is not predicting the future... it is creating it.
I pretty much hold to this view but not so much in the definition. I believe that "prophecy" is God creating the future. It is the foretelling of His plans and what He intends to dop. I do not believe that God peers into the future to tell us what is going to happen. I believe that God tells us what is going to happen and then He brings it about. Let us look at one of the prooftexts that PastorJ used a moment ago (good work PastorJ though I know you disagree with me, yet at least you are doing your homework):
Remember the former things of old: for I am God, and there is none else; I am God, and there is none like me, Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure: (Isa. 46:9, 10)
Notice that God does not say that He "sees" the end from the beginning, but that He DECLARES it - He speaks it!! Then He says that He will do that thing that pleases Him, that which He is declaring. As a matter of fact, all of PastorJ's quotes and nearly every other prophetic utterance can be seen in this manner.
LittleRocketBoy said:
God does not know He has to believe for it to be... it just is.
I believe that since the future does not exist then it is not, except that which God says will happen because there is no one who can stop Him from bringing to pass what he declares. I believe that God knows all things that are in existence, but since a
blue freckled boogly wop does not exist, God does not know anything about it.
However, if I accepted the belief that God knows all of the future in exact detail then I would have to drop the belief that He exercises faith because the two are incompatible.