HITR
Hand Crafted
- Feb 13, 2002
- 97
- 3
- 54
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
You still are not getting the point.
Yea, I am getting the point now just as well as I did then, regardless of what you try to assert. You see, I never said that the trinity was spelled out in clear language, as you continue insist, try as you might. I said that it is a rather clear indication of it. Find one place where I stated it was specifically stated and proven, and I will gladly recant. If you take an honest look, youll find that I said just this. It cant be proven and its not in explicit language.
As for semi-pelagian, this is merely a label slapped on men by other men. It is nothing to me. You can use your label in any way that pleases you. It, again, means absolutely nothing to me.
Now, before I even begin to address hypocrisy with you, Id ask you to either be specific in exactly where you see that Im not applying this across the board, or address the post about the many in terms of Romans 5:15 to be in unison with the many found in Matthew 20:28, using the same standard by which you expect of others. The must be able to reconcile, naturally, otherwise Scripture is contradicting Scripture. If you do not do this, then I would offer you a mirror in which to view the hypocrisy of which you claim to see.
Well, so far you have demonstrated that you employ the same free floating "principle" as the others here, so the conclusion I've reached is proven by your actions.
Your concluded opinion, respectfully, is of little credibility, and no consequence, to me. You know what I find equally as credible as our actions? The words of our mouth, for they betray the condition of our hearts.
Again, Im not interested in a game of ***-for-tat, thanks anyway! Im interested in discussing doctrine with my brethren.
In Him, HITR
Upvote
0