Why are creationists scared of Evolution?

somasoma77 said:

God works in and through his creation and that is called evolution.

Click to expand...

my response :o

then why isn't evolution better?

somasoma77 said:

God works in and through his creation and that is called evolution.

Click to expand...

One of several possibilities, I suppose. Though, based on my own subjective assessment, I wouldn't consider it to be of a high probability.

...because some people are taught that a book is infallible, and they completely write off any theory that goes against it, whether it be logical or illogical.

People need to realize that their relationship with their creator is not affected by whether or not the old testament literal.

that's just my take.

if it's all about Relationship, you shouldn't need a book

Why was gallileo jailed for knowledge? because people force their INTERPRETATION onto others. They want truth to be what they believe. Creationists have no evidence they can point to and are therefore lashing out because they fear losing their "Security Blanket" of calmness and order in the universe... >.>

miniverchivi said:

...because some people are taught that a book is infallible, and they completely write off any theory that goes against it, whether it be logical or illogical.

People need to realize that their relationship with their creator is not affected by whether or not the old testament literal.

that's just my take.

Click to expand...

The literal/non-literal stance on the Bible often seems to act as a stand-in for the accurate/inaccurate controversy. If one person says the Bible is inaccurate, another will invariably claim that only the literal interpretation appears inaccurate. It would be my hope that if there were a God, and that God felt belief should be the deciding factor between an eternity such as that attributed to heaven verses one attributed to Hell, he would be far more literal and clear about the intent. There are at least hundreds of intepretations and likely many thousands. It seems a poor way to provide a message.

Perhaps it should be seen as either accurate or inaccurate. Though applying such qualities would more than likely find it to be the latter.

Excuse me but what evidence supports it. I have never seen any fact in evolution that does not have a missing link. And I am not scared of Evolution. I just know it's wrong. And I shall not lower my standards to meet yours and other evolutionists. Such as that one cave that they claim they found human tools and monkey skulls in. But they forgot one crushall element, THERE WAS HUMAN SKULLS AND BONES IN THERE AS WELL. Therefore it was obveusly a place that they ate monkey brains. Which is a scienctific fact. Thank you very much.

Nevaeh07 said:

Excuse me but what evidence supports it. I have never seen any fact in evolution that does not have a missing link. And I am not scared of Evolution. I just know it's wrong. And I shall not lower my standards to meet yours and other evolutionists. Such as that one cave that they claim they found human tools and monkey skulls in. But they forgot one crushall element, THERE WAS HUMAN SKULLS AND BONES IN THERE AS WELL. Therefore it was obveusly a place that they ate monkey brains. Which is a scienctific fact. Thank you very much.

Click to expand...

12-year-old thinks she knows more biology than the biologists... this has got to be a joke. (Poe's Law hurr)

Nevaeh07 said:

And I shall not lower my standards to meet yours and other evolutionists. Such as that one cave that they claim they found human tools and monkey skulls in. But they forgot one crushall element, THERE WAS HUMAN SKULLS AND BONES IN THERE AS WELL. Therefore it was obveusly a place that they ate monkey brains. Which is a scienctific fact. Thank you very much.

Click to expand...

Young lady, you may wish to familiarize yourself with the meaning fo the word irony since you suggest you will not lower your standards in one breath, then apply no standards for discernment of truth when you offer an unsupported, uncited anecdote that makes no sense what so ever.

Personally I suggest you keep away from this forum until you've learned a bit more about the topic or what constitutes evidence within it's context.

Nevaeh07 said:

Excuse me but what evidence supports it. I have never seen any fact in evolution that does not have a missing link. And I am not scared of Evolution. I just know it's wrong. And I shall not lower my standards to meet yours and other evolutionists. Such as that one cave that they claim they found human tools and monkey skulls in. But they forgot one crushall element, THERE WAS HUMAN SKULLS AND BONES IN THERE AS WELL. Therefore it was obveusly a place that they ate monkey brains. Which is a scienctific fact. Thank you very much.

Click to expand...

Please give us an example of a "fact in evolution that does not have a missing link." Also, explain how you "know" that evolution is wrong. Is it because mom and dad told you it was wrong?

You are welcome.

Nevaeh07 said:

Excuse me but what evidence supports it. I have never seen any fact in evolution that does not have a missing link. And I am not scared of Evolution. I just know it's wrong. And I shall not lower my standards to meet yours and other evolutionists. Such as that one cave that they claim they found human tools and monkey skulls in. But they forgot one crushall element, THERE WAS HUMAN SKULLS AND BONES IN THERE AS WELL. Therefore it was obveusly a place that they ate monkey brains. Which is a scienctific fact. Thank you very much.

Click to expand...

what facts support your beliefs???

There's missing links in the bible too.

RoboMastodon said:

12-year-old thinks she knows more biology than the biologists... this has got to be a joke. (Poe's Law hurr)

Click to expand...

and sixteen year old thinks the same too wha ha ha ha ha.

RoboMastodon said:

12-year-old thinks she knows more biology than the biologists... this has got to be a joke. (Poe's Law hurr)

Click to expand...

In the story of "The Emperor's New Cloths" it was a child who spoke the obvious " Emperor was naked" while the wise men was going along with the King. We adults often played games as well, often deceiving ourselves in which a child's honestly sometimes will reveal the truth.

Smidlee said:

In the story of "The Emperor's New Cloths" it was a child who spoke the obvious " Emperor was naked" while the wise men was going along with the King. We adults often played games as well, often deceiving ourselves in which a child's honestly sometimes will reveal the truth.

Click to expand...

According to this reasoning, Santa Claus really does exist.

Smidlee said:

In the story of "The Emperor's New Cloths" it was a child who spoke the obvious " Emperor was naked" while the wise men was going along with the King. We adults often played games as well, often deceiving ourselves in which a child's honestly sometimes will reveal the truth.

Click to expand...

Not a valid parallel, Smidlee. Science requires education, and those parading ignorance of science as wisdom are comparable to the vain emporer, not the child.

Loudmouth said:

According to this reasoning, Santa Claus really does exist.

Click to expand...

don't tell me Santa Claus really doesn't exist? GASP

RoboMastodon said:

12-year-old thinks she knows more biology than the biologists... this has got to be a joke. (Poe's Law hurr)

Click to expand...

I may be twelve but I have God on my side.

Nevaeh07 said:

I may be twelve but I have God on my side.

Click to expand...

Ah yes, God is a conservative American Republican.

The question is, are you on God’s side?