- Dec 25, 2003
- 42,058
- 16,810
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Private
Great. 24 hours have passed and not on Creationist has tossed a tu quoque logical fallacy claim back in my face. I'm in irony overload. Unless of course my pointing out the tu quoque nature of the OP was engaging in tu quoque myself in which case my irony meter would implode in on itself disappearing in a tiny puff of logic.
Are there no Creationists who want to defend the rhetorical value of "Goo to you via the zoo" when the obvious response is that Creationism is "Clod to bod due to God?" Or is the serious discussion of issues like phylogenies, homolgous structures, ERVs, the fossil record, problems with flood geology less ego satisfying than empty bon mots?
Are there no Creationists who want to defend the rhetorical value of "Goo to you via the zoo" when the obvious response is that Creationism is "Clod to bod due to God?" Or is the serious discussion of issues like phylogenies, homolgous structures, ERVs, the fossil record, problems with flood geology less ego satisfying than empty bon mots?
Upvote
0