But that is just a process of time. If you hang around long enough people will join you. Our goal is to enter into the new age.SearchingSDA said:Sorry, previous post edited for clarity.
Upvote
0
But that is just a process of time. If you hang around long enough people will join you. Our goal is to enter into the new age.SearchingSDA said:Sorry, previous post edited for clarity.
statrei said:But that is just a process of time. If you hang around long enough people will join you. Our goal is to enter into the new age.
He has promised to keep us so that is not in dispute. Do you believe that Jesus has already returned?SearchingSDA said:My goal is to serve the Lord in whatever capacity I can and believe that He holds my future whatever it may be.
What if we are already in "The New Age"?
statrei said:He has promised to keep us so that is not in dispute.
statrei said:Do you believe that Jesus has already returned?
That is what I am concerned about. Even a blind can see that all these theories about preterist, pre-trib, pre-mill only reflect the utter confusion in the ranks of Christians, in the face of Jesus' prayer that they all be one.SearchingSDA said:I do not believe that He has come in the Final Judgment and Resurrection.
statrei said:The world was not the ones who prayed to God and got No! Something is wrong with the relationship between God and the church.
This sounds like God's will is a separate agency from Him. Please clarify your statement.SassySDA said:God heard the prayers, and He responded to the point His will would allow.
Forgetting for the moment people in the path of the storm, what then would have been the purpose of the prayers?SassySDA said:If they are meant to happen as part of the progression toward the end result of Jesus' returning for us, then no amount of prayer is going to stop them.
I'll have to take some time to get the measure of this statement.SassySDA said:If you want better answers than the ones you've gotten here so far, you're going to have to wait and ask Him yourself.
Category 4-5 hurricanes have winds over 130 mph. According to noaa Katrina made landfall at approximately 150 mph. I think you should amend your statements.SassySDA said:As I have stated in numerous other posts regarding this tragedy...the hurricane DID de-escalate. It was no longer a hurricane 5 when it hit the shore.
statrei said:I am not questioning God's behavior, no matter how much you try to change my post to say that. Everyone say what God did. He did not send the Hurricane. Those were natural forces at work. But the Christian community felt it had the power to move God to do something and He said, "No, thank you." This speaks powerfully.
breezynosacek said:If you believe that God said "No, thank you." to the Christian community then you are assuming that the entire Christian Community prayed that God would take the hurricane away.
This paragraph illustrates why I am glad I continued reading your post. The Christians who spoke of "speaking faith" into the situation have been taught this aberration by church leaders. And many Christians believe some version of it.breezynosacek said:Somebody else on here mentioned 'speaking faith' into the situation. We dare not believe that faith is the end all of everything. Since when do we run around expecting 'speaking faith' into a situation to change it? Faith is not a power. Jesus has the power, the Holy Spirit has the power and we are to seek the will of God and fulfill it, not create it.
The first paragraph relates to nothing about Christ's return before the time of the Father...The Spirit did what was promised..orthodoxy does not teach that some of the Apostles will live until the return of the Lord.statrei said:I have already demonstrated that we cannot place unquestioning confidence in what the church says. John 21 is evidence from the apostolic era that these men of the Spirit came to the wrong conclusion because they were lax in considering the fact. For a while that wrong conclusion was widely believed requiring them to corrrect it when unfolding events revealed the problem.
That said, you must be careful not to place God on a time clock. You are thinking of appointed time in terms of chronology rather than in terms of sequence. He is not bound by time.
John 21 tells the story of how the early church had to correct a false teaching they had adopted. For some reason commentators on this text completely miss what the text is saying. The belief that John would live till the Second Coming was believed and then discovered to be unfounded.water_ripple said:The first paragraph relates to nothing about Christ's return before the time of the Father...The Spirit did what was promised..orthodoxy does not teach that some of the Apostles will live until the return of the Lord.
I do not have God on a time clock..Either you misunderstand me or are purposefully misrepresenting me since I have posted over and over what Christ said will happen before His return...and His acknowledgement to the disciples that it would not occur in "their generation".
statrei said:We have just unearthed one of the major problems with Christian belief. Like you, I did not pray the prayer I heard that many prayed. According to your argument here is what we are left with. If 1 million of the 2 milllion Christians prayed that prayer we have to discount the result. But if there had only been 1 million Christians and all had prayed the prayer we could not discount the result. Are we working by percentages here? That is a very dangerous road to walk on. When a few Christians do wonderful deeds we are quick to say how great "the Christian community" is. Could we have become fair weather Christians?
This paragraph illustrates why I am glad I continued reading your post. The Christians who spoke of "speaking faith" into the situation have been taught this aberration by church leaders. And many Christians believe some version of it.
Could you at least tell us how you feel?breezynosacek said:Nope, no percentages whatsoever. "When a few Christians do wonderful deeds we are quick to say how great "the Christian community" is" Personally, I don't think the Christian community is all that great and never have.
IF the Christian community ever does something wonderful, then I would have to call it an act of God so even then, they don't get the credit. Even great sinners do wonderful deeds. If we start comparing our deeds then the Church has a lot to make up for. The churches are so full of harlotry, it's a wonder God hasn't vomited the whole lot out of His mouth. I'm staying away from church buildings.
Fair weather Christians...I'm not even sure I could say that much good about the spiritual condition of today's churches. If you want an example of the condition of the church just go to any "Christian Forum" and look at all the hatred being spewed, the backbiting, the quarreling that lead people astray. On the one hand, we say, Aw you poor duck come over here with your wounds and we'll make you all better with the love of Jesus. On the other hand, they slice and dice each other.
There used to be a saying in Charismatic circles, "Christians are the only ones who shoot their own wounded." I say, that if they were Christians they wouldn't be shooting.
statrei said:John 21 tells the story of how the early church had to correct a false teaching they had adopted. For some reason commentators on this text completely miss what the text is saying. The belief that John would live till the Second Coming was believed and then discovered to be unfounded.
How can you say that Jesus acknowledged to the disciples that He would not come iin their generation? Please direct me to the passage you rely on. You are already aware of the one in Matthew that negates that view.
Let's see. The only persons who were present when that conversation was conducted were the apostles. How do you think somebody else decided to interpret what they had not heard?deu58 said:John 21 tells of a false belief this is true, But it does not say that the apostles were responsible for spreading this belief,
I agree with you that this belief was developed later. When Paul wrote I Thess. it was not yet known, else Paul would have used it. But it would have been much better to have something from Jesus they could point to than just Paul's assurance. Again, only Apostles heard that comment. They were the ones who started it. Why do you think it is such a problem for the Apostles to be wrong? Angels in heaven were wrong. Adam and Eve were wrong. I don't understand where you were coming from.deu58 said:If We look at acts they all expected Christ to return before ANY of them died, They sold all their posessions and were waiting for the return together,
They did not think that that it was dependant on John being the last apostle left alive,
They were already teaching and telling their stories, As time passed people would have been looking for reasons why he had not come and assurance that he would be coming soon, It would have been at that time that people would be taking the tarry till I return statement out of context,
The more people are involved the more heresy and rumors there would be, We see the Apostles correcting all these things, Not spreading them,