You cannot be brought back to repentance.
Why? Because of a problem with God? Or is the problem with the "disbeliever"?
I posted the link, but it seems some have not clicked on it. So I shall copy the post that was linked:
For those that believe OSNAS how do you reconcile the belief that you can regain your salvation with this passage in Hebrews 6?? It says very clearly that if you fall way there will be no return!! You cannot continually RE-crucify Jesus. As the passage says, you would be continuing to subject him to the public digrace that he underwent for us already. Once was enough....the final be-all and end-all.
I think we've discussed this one, but happy to discuss it again. That passage in Heb6 is most easily understood in the Greek. Specifically, in regard to verb TENSE. It is most correctly translated: "For in the case of those who have been once enlightened, have tasted of the heavenly gift and been bade partakers of the Holy Spirit..."
There are those who contend that THEY WERE ONLY SUPERFICIAL, not really SAVED. But can "lurkers, not-really-saved", can the UNSAVED be made partakers of the Holy Spirit??? Does the Holy Spirit indwell THOSE WHO ARE NOT SAVED??? "...those who have been made partakers of the Holy Spirit, and have tasted the powers of the age to come, and then
ARE FALLING AWAY, it is impossible..."
Impossible to what? Restore salvation? No! "For it is impossible
to restore them to repentance,
SINCE they crucify to themselves Christ anew and hold Him up to contempt".
Let's deviate a moment from this Scripture, and read Hebrews 3:12-13: "Take care, brethren, lest there be in any of you an evil, unbelieving heart, in falling away from the living God. But encourage one another, ...lest any one of you be hardened by the deceitfulness of sin".
What if it is possible to be deceived by sin, into
UNBELIEF? Unbelief which causes the heart to be hardened? What then will be the attitude towards Christ? Only one attitude in that condition:
contempt!
So, in Heb6, it simply says: "Those who were TRULY SAVED, and if they FALL AWAY (because of hardening by deceitful sin), it is impossible to restore them to
repentance, SINCE they crucify Christ to themselves anew and hold Him up to contempt."
The "hinge", the "fulcrum" of this entire passage, is the word,
SINCE. Which has the meaning of
BECAUSE.
"They won't want to repent,
WHILE they are falling away,
BECAUSE they have disbelieved in Him and become
contemptuous."
Thus, the entire problem in this passage, is with THEMSELVES. Their UNBELIEF.
But if their unbelief CEASES, other Scripture is clear that He will welcome them back, just as did the father with the Prodigal Son...
So, if you believe OSNAS, and you have committed any of the sins from the "lists" that have been argued exhaustively on this thread, then you have once and forever renounced your place in Christ for He will NOT be crucified again!
Salvation is not "lost" by "committing any of the sins from the lists". Actually,
salvation cannot be LOST at ALL. This is because of what salvation
IS. Salvation is
fellowship with/in/through Jesus. Why do Paul and Peter give us the lists? In harmony with what Jesus said. Salvation is CHRIST-IN-YOU; and
therefore, he-(she)-who-has-Christ-inside, will CONSEQUENTIALLY do the good deeds.
If a Christian stumbles and "does a sin from the list", he does not necessarily fall-from-salvation. Remember, salvation cannot be LOST---it can only be REJECTED. If the person's heart becomes hardened, so that DOING sins from the "bad-list" become habitual, repetitive
WITHOUT REPENTANCE, then Christ no longer abides in his heart (Gal2:20)---
and salvation has been REJECTED.
Hebrews 6:6 (since they crucify to themselves Christ again), is identical with Heb10:26: "For if we continue sinning willfully, there no longer remains a sacrifice for our sins..." Without repentance, Jesus' ONE death does not pay for sins. It is as if He need die again-and-again. Which cannot be---He died ONCE.
He died ONCE, to forgive our sin (not "sins")---all conditional upon our belief, and our repentance.
Our hope is sure and steadfast, an anchor for our soul---our hope is "what WE have FLED FOR refuge, in OUR LAYING AHOLD of the hope set before us".
WHAT is our "HOPE"? It's not a what, it's WHO!
Our HOPE is
JESUS!!!
"According to the commandment of God our Savior, Christ Jesus,
WHO IS OUR HOPE!" 1Tim1:1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
So I do not believe it is honest to say "they were never saved". THat would be saying, "unsaved people were PARTAKERS of the Holy Spirit". I don't think He indwells the unsaved. Likewise, to say "THEY NEVER LOST SALVATION! THIS is only NEGATIVE-HYPOTHETICAL---
if they fall away (but everybody KNOWS they CANNOT"--- don't write into it what is not there. Hebrews has several verses that speak of "falling from the living God". It says, "in the case of those-who-WERE-saved, if they fall away, they won't WANT to repent". It is equally dishonest to say "it's only hypoTHETICAL, because they CANNOT be unsaved". It says what it says.
I've heard a similar argument used for Rev3:5. "He who overcomes shall be clothed in white garments,
and I will NOT BLOT HIS NAME from the Book of Life". They say, "Oh it's only HYPOTHETICAL! 'Cause everyone KNOWS that names cannot be blotted! (How then, does one deal with
children? Do not children who die, go to Heaven? (Matt19:14) Then, isn't EVERYONE born
written into the Book of Life, and each ONLY has his (her) name removed, when he disbelieves???)
The question, is "which view takes Scripture clearly, and which view is a stretch"? Take 2Tim2:11-13: "For if we died with Him, we shall also live with Him; if we endure, we shall also reign with Him. If we shall deny Him, He also will deny us. If we are faithless, He remains faithful."
There are two ways to "interpret" 2Tim2:11-13.
1. "If we endure, we shall reign with Him; if we deny Him He will also deny us,
but we shall STILL REIGN WITH HIM, because even if WE are faithless nevertheless HE remains faithful FOR HE CANNOT DENY HIMSELF!
2. "If we endure, we shall reign with Him; BUT if we deny Him He also will deny us, and we will NOT reign with Him! If we are faithless, even though we PERISH yet He remains faithful for He cannot deny Himself".
Which "interpretation" is more Scriptural? And which is a stretch? In Matthew 10:32 Jesus says, "Everyone therefore who shall confess Me before men, I will also confess him before my Father who is in Heaven. But whoever shall deny Me before men, I will also deny him before My Father who is in Heaven." Contextually, does Jesus really mean that those who He denies before the Father, WILL GO TO HEAVEN?
This is the value of reading Scriptures in context, with understanding from other Scriptures. If it all harmonizes, then there must be one understanding that harmonizes it all. We can believe in "OSAS", be it "predestined-election", or "carnal Christian", or "eternal security", UNTIL we read passage after passage after passage that speaks of "FALLING FROM SALVATION". Then we must search for the belief that harmonizes ALL of the Scripture...