Questions about the Apocrypha

Christy4Christ

Pro-Christ
Jan 30, 2004
4,948
117
53
Hollywood, FL
✟5,762.00
Faith
Catholic
Hi,

Thanks for those answers. I was actually taught correctly that the Sabbath is Saturday. I do however go to church on Sundays but that is because I guess we chose that day to honor Jesus' resurrection. I would never claim to be educated on all of this. I never studied Theology or anything like that. I only know that it must be so hard to try and live under that law! I was always taught that Jesus came not to change the law but to fulfill it. I do believe that He fullfilled the 333 prophesies of Him that were in the OT.

Actually I just learned about the number of prophesies fullfilled and I thought it was really neat! I even have a list of what they were if anyone is interested. Not that you wouldn't already know what they are! :D

I also have just begun reading a book from the old old old testament that was removed by the Jews in like 100 AD. I don't know exactly why it was removed but in any case this is one of the books from what we know today as The Apocrypha. There is an ongoing "war" between Protestants and Catholics as to whether or not the books were inspired. The books were kept in the Catholic bibles but removed from the Protestant bible in the 1800's. I guess what happened was when the Jews removed the books in the year 100 AD ( or right around there) the early Christians kept the books. The certain book I am talking about is the book of Wisdom. I have already found like 12 verses in that book that prophesied Jesus!

I am on a journey right now in my life to learn the truth surrounding all of these things. I hope you know that when I post here it is for my own education, I figure I can learn alot about the OT from you guys. I am not at all trying to discourage anything you do or do not do. I am certainly no one to say one way or the other! I just like to share my views and then hear yours. I hate arguing when it comes to matters of God and I most definately didn't come here in that spirit. So please do not think I am some crazy come here to start trouble.

I love you all in Christ. He is our common denominator :amen:

And Shalom! Or should I have said that in the beginning? :confused:
 

simchat_torah

Got Torah?
Feb 23, 2003
7,345
433
46
San Francisco, CA
Visit site
✟9,917.00
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
The books weren't necessarily "removed" in Judaism. In Judaism there is a view of "levels of inspiration". For example, G-d could talk to me today and I could write it down. Would it be considered "inspired"? Absolutely. However, the Torah was spoken direclty by the mouth of G-d... that is on a higher plane of insipration.

The Apocrypha was removed from the generic cannon for a couple of reasons. There were actually several other books removed from the cannon at that time because many priests and Rabbis felt that they were too much for the general public to understand. They weren't necessarily removed because of bad theology, or incorrect history (as protestants would have you believe).
 
Upvote 0

simchat_torah

Got Torah?
Feb 23, 2003
7,345
433
46
San Francisco, CA
Visit site
✟9,917.00
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
In christianity if something is in the cannon its considered 'inspired'. In Judaism, there is a much looser definition of 'inspiration'. However, there are many levels of 'inspiration'. Is the Apocrypha inspired according to Jewish tradition? yep.

But what level of inspiration does it exist within? Well, that depends on who you ask.

But in the protestant christian mindset, the Apocrypha is only 'not-inspired' and nothing else... some may even go as far as to label it evil. I've seen some really crazy teachings in protestant movements declaring that the Apocyrpha was written by the Catholic church, etc... clearly nonsense and from a lack of scholarship on their part. *shrug* oh well.

shalom,
yafet.
 
Upvote 0

BenTsion

Yeshua Worshipper
Nov 20, 2003
224
7
44
✟7,869.00
Faith
Messianic
Christy,
Shalom!

Unfortunately, people usually live in extremes. Some people refuse to understand that not believing X is right doesn't mean we have to go all the way to -X. There's one example that will help you understand what I mean. Protestants (and Messianic Jews as well) do not believe that bowing down to an icon of Mary is biblically supported. Unfortunately, because Protestants believe too much honor is given to Mary in the Catholic church, some people go to the other extreme and dishonor her. I mean, I have seen Protestants who would curse Mary's name. That is not right either. We see churches which are too liberal, churches which are too legalistic... all because human beings have a hard time achieving balance.

The same applies to the Apocrypha. Though I respectfully disagree with Yafet in regards to why they were not included in the canon (the Apocrypha were not included not because they were too difficult to grasp, but because they didn't meet the conditions that were established for books to be considered canonical, and such conditions included proof of authenticity, place and time when they were written, who wrote them, etc.), I believe that he is absolutely right in a sense that we should not 'cry wolf' and say it was written by Satan.

However, as books that are not part of the Tanach (the 'Old' Testament canon), we cannot consider them authoritative in terms of theology. Oftentimes, there are things in them which contradicts previous scripture. So, we should do what is recommended by Rav. Sha'ul (Paul)... prove everything and hold fast to that which is good. There is precious information you can withdraw from the Apocrypha. It was not written by Satan's angels, don't worry. But, be careful to check with the rest of scriptures when it comes to the theology which is written in them.

May G-d bless you!

In Messiah,
Ben Tsion
 
Upvote 0

BenTsion

Yeshua Worshipper
Nov 20, 2003
224
7
44
✟7,869.00
Faith
Messianic
Your name has a crazy resemblance to one of the "Left Behind" characters! Tsion BenJudah...I think that was his name. I appreciate any info I learn from all of you.

LOL! I certainly hope I don't get 'Left Behind'... ;)

Many of the nicknames of us weirdo's of the 'Messianic Judaism' forum actually come from Hebrew words and/or expressions. In my case, 'Ben Tsion' means 'Son of Zion'.

May HaShem bless you!

Ben Tsion
 
Upvote 0

simchat_torah

Got Torah?
Feb 23, 2003
7,345
433
46
San Francisco, CA
Visit site
✟9,917.00
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
(the Apocrypha were not included not because they were too difficult to grasp, but because they didn't meet the conditions that were established for books to be considered canonical, and such conditions included proof of authenticity, place and time when they were written, who wrote them, etc.),


Yes, this is why protestant's reject the Apocrypha... but not why the original Jewish council removed them approxiametely 100 ce.

shalom!
yafet.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

simchat_torah

Got Torah?
Feb 23, 2003
7,345
433
46
San Francisco, CA
Visit site
✟9,917.00
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
In fact, Judaism borrows many traditions from the Apocryphal books (ie: Channukah) and they are often quoted in the Brit Chadasha. But they were removed from the official cannon because they were special historical books that were held within priestly confines only... and never found in the scrolls among the general synagogues populace.

shalom,
yafet.
 
Upvote 0

Christy4Christ

Pro-Christ
Jan 30, 2004
4,948
117
53
Hollywood, FL
✟5,762.00
Faith
Catholic
Why did they get removed then? Is it possible that it was because there were alot of prophesies about Jesus in them? I am curious about that. I always wondered if maybe after the crucifixion the Jewish people of that time realized He had actually been the Messiah and then didn't want anything to point to that? Please do remember I come here as a friend to discuss things and learn I am so fearful of offending someone as that really is not my intention I cannot stress that enough. It is just a question I have heard asked before and I'd like all of your input on that.
 
Upvote 0

BenTsion

Yeshua Worshipper
Nov 20, 2003
224
7
44
✟7,869.00
Faith
Messianic
simchat_torah said:
[/font]

Yes, this is why protestant's reject the Apocrypha... but not why the original Jewish council removed them approxiametely 100 ce.

shalom!
yafet.

Actually, Yafet, the information I have is that the Jewish groups who established the canon after the destruction of the temple (mostly the P'rushim), had the following criteria to decide which books were to be in the canon and which were not:

1) written originally in Hebrew
2) written within the confines of Eretz Israel
3) the book must not contradict the Torah
4) the book must have been written before the time of Artaxerxes

At least that is how I learned it...

In Messiah,
Ben Tsion
 
Upvote 0

BenTsion

Yeshua Worshipper
Nov 20, 2003
224
7
44
✟7,869.00
Faith
Messianic
Christy4Christ said:
Is it possible that it was because there were alot of prophesies about Jesus in them?

I don't think so... first because that would pretty much have ruled out half the Tanach as we know it... and second because there aren't many (if any) Messianic references in the apocrypha...

In Messiah,
Ben Tsion
 
Upvote 0

Christy4Christ

Pro-Christ
Jan 30, 2004
4,948
117
53
Hollywood, FL
✟5,762.00
Faith
Catholic
Ben ,

I am going to copy just 12 verses from the book of Wisdom here, I just read this myself and trust me I am no expert on it but does it sound like prophesy of Jesus to you? I'd love your opinion.

Wisdom 2:12-25

12 Let us, therefore, lie in wait for the just, because he is not for our turn, and he is contrary to our doings, and upbraideth us with transgressions of the law, and divulgeth against us the sins of our way of life.

13 He boasteth that he hath the knowledge of God, and calleth himself the son of God.

14 He is become a censurer of our thoughts.

15 He is grievous unto us, even to behold: for his life is not like other men's, and his ways are very different.

16 We are esteemed by him as triflers, and he abstaineth from our ways as from filthiness, and he preferreth the latter end of the just, and glorieth that he hath God for his father.

17 Let us see then if his words be true, and let us prove what shall happen to him, and we shall know what his end shall be.

18 For if he be the true son of God, he will defend him, and will deliver him from the hands of his enemies.

19 Let us examine him by outrages and tortures, that we may know his meekness, and try his patience.

20 Let us condemn him to a most shameful death: for there shall be respect had unto him by his words.

21 These things they thought, and were deceived: for their own malice blinded them.

22 And they knew not the secrets of God, nor hoped for the wages of justice, nor esteemed the honour of holy souls.

23 For God created man incorruptible, and to the image of his own likeness he made him.

24 But by the envy of the devil, death came into the world:

25 And they follow him that are of his side.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums