How old is the world?

Sinai

Well-Known Member
Apr 2, 2002
1,127
19
Visit site
✟1,762.00
Faith
Protestant
wisdomseeker said:
I am interested in knowing exactly how old the world is scientifically and biblical. Please help!
Scientists estimate the age of our planet as being approximately 4.5-4.6 billion years, though this figure may be revised over the next 18 months as data from the Deep Space probe that examined the core of Comet Tempel 1 is analyzed.

The Bible does not say how old the world is, though the geneologies from Adam to Christ are generally measured as being about 4-44 thousand years (depending upon which of the assumptions made by Ussher and Lightfoot one accepts and which ones are rejected). The principal difference among theologians is in how the six yoms of the first Chapter of Genesis should be interpreted.
Both the young earth creationists (YECs) and the old earth creationists (OECs) generally believe God created the universe and the earth as set out in the first chapter of Genesis, although you will find some differences of opinion in both groups.

Although the YECs may differ among themselves as to how many of the assumptions made by Ussher and Lightfoot they believe, they tend to be united in their belief that the Hebrew word transliterated as yom should only be interpreted to mean a 24-hour day. They reject the other meanings for yom primarily because that is the most common usage of the word and because of the repeated usage of the phrase that concludes each of the six days of creation: (with the Hebrew words reversed to correspond to the English order) wayhi-'erev wayhi-voqer yom 'echadh....yom sheni....yom shelishi...., which is generally translated "and it was evening and it was morning day one....day second....day third," etc. (which they say clearly show a regular 24-hour day).

The OECs also have their divisions, with the major division probably being between the ones who accept a literal reading of Genesis and those who prefer a figurative or nonliteral reading. Both groups tend to remind the YECs that since the sun doesn't show up until the fourth yom and since it is not certain the Earth has been formed until the third yom, a 24-hour day is questionable. Additionally, the group favoring a figurative interpretation generally assert that the Bible's account of creation is intended to be read figuratively instead of literally. They say the Bible is a spiritual guide, not a science book, and the purpose of its creation account is to say that God created the universe and cares about our spiritual needs.

The OEC literalists generally point out that the Hebrew word for “day” (yom) can mean an indefinite period of time. Thus, they generally contend that each “day” of creation was of an indefinite period of time (even millions or billions of years) and we shouldn’t get caught up in insisting that the Bible means something here that it probably does not mean. They also respond to the YECs' "evening and morning" argument by pointing out that the Hebrew usage of the words can (and probably do) indicate during each successive yom, God was bringing greater order out of chaos.

The Bible can support any of these positions--and they are discussed and debated in much greater detail in various threads and polls in this forum.
 
Upvote 0

wisdomseeker

Member
Jun 5, 2005
18
1
✟143.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Thank you for all your responses. However, I am still curious about dinosaurs being in exsistence billions of years ago. How is it we still find thier remains? Wouldn't they have disenegrated by now? Also I have read many articles saying life could not exsist at that time because of the postion of the sun and moon. I just don't know what to believe.
 
Upvote 0

Ozymandius

Well-Known Member
May 15, 2005
838
47
✟1,237.00
Faith
Atheist
wisdomseeker said:
Thank you for all your responses. However, I am still curious about dinosaurs being in exsistence billions of years ago. How is it we still find thier remains? Wouldn't they have disenegrated by now? Also I have read many articles saying life could not exsist at that time because of the postion of the sun and moon. I just don't know what to believe.

What kind of articles are these (about the sun and the moon?) I'm not sure what you're referring to here.
 
Upvote 0

Elduran

Disruptive influence
May 19, 2005
1,773
64
41
✟9,830.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Ozymandius said:
What kind of articles are these (about the sun and the moon?) I'm not sure what you're referring to here.
My guess: the shrinking sun argument and the "losing the moon" argument.

These have both been thoroughly debunked on these forums, so I wouldn't believe either one of those particular bits of pseudo-science ;)
 
Upvote 0

AnEmpiricalAgnostic

Agnostic by Fact, Atheist by Epiphany
May 25, 2005
2,734
186
50
South Florida
Visit site
✟18,986.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
wisdomseeker said:
Thank you for all your responses. However, I am still curious about dinosaurs being in exsistence billions of years ago. How is it we still find thier remains? Wouldn't they have disenegrated by now? Also I have read many articles saying life could not exsist at that time because of the postion of the sun and moon. I just don't know what to believe.
Congratulations on taking the first step and actually asking questions. The dinosaurs existed millions of years ago (not billions, here is a timeline to start you out:


[url="http://www.talkorigins.org/origins/geo_timeline.html"]http://www.talkorigins.org/origins/geo_timeline.html[/url]

And here’s a bit about fossils [url="http://www.cartage.org.lb/en/themes/Sciences/LifeScience/PhysicalAnthropology/EvolutionFact/FossilisationFossil/FossilisationFossil.htm"]http://www.cartage.org.lb/en/themes/Sciences/LifeScience/PhysicalAnthropology/EvolutionFact/FossilisationFossil/FossilisationFossil.htm[/url]

You may also want to check out the sticky quiet thread up top:

[url="http://www.christianforums.com/showthread.php?p=15844232&postcount=29"]http://www.christianforums.com/showthread.php?p=15844232&postcount=29[/url]

You’ll find a lot of usefull info there.
 
Upvote 0

L'Anatra

Contributor
Dec 29, 2002
678
27
39
Pensacola, FL
Visit site
✟969.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
wisdomseeker said:
Thank you for all your responses. However, I am still curious about dinosaurs being in exsistence billions of years ago. How is it we still find thier remains? Wouldn't they have disenegrated by now? Also I have read many articles saying life could not exsist at that time because of the postion of the sun and moon. I just don't know what to believe.
Nobody has suggested dinosaurs existed billions of years ago. The animals commonly known as dinosaurs existed in what is known as the Mesozoic Era (a period of time between 250 million years ago and 65 million years ago). Their remains have been fossilized, a process whereby bone is essentially transformed into stone. Fossilization is a very rare process, but we find fossils all the time. Additionally, the positions of the sun and the moon haven't changed much in the last 4 billion years or so.

Don't worry about knowing "what to believe" so much as going out and researching it for yourself. This isn't something that is easily undertaken, either. Don't take anyone's word for it but rather look at the evidence. Read the peer-reviewed scientific papers. There are people here that are more than willing to help. :)
 
Upvote 0

pantsman52

Senior Veteran
Dec 29, 2003
3,462
220
53
Fairfield
✟4,755.00
Faith
Agnostic
Politics
US-Democrat
A4C said:
The thing that is interesting about "science" is that "it" says "It is right because we say it is right"
No proof
No observation
Just "well it happened this way because the only other way would be creation and because science cannot be religious it definately wasn't created."

If anybody can show me that that sort of thing is honest (or even scientific for that matter) then I will withdraw my remarks about "lies"

The thing that is interesting about "christianity" is that "it" says "It is right because we say it is right"
No proof
No observation
Just "well it happened this way because the only other way would be evolution and because christianity cannot accept evolution, life definately didn't evolve."
 
Upvote 0

Sinai

Well-Known Member
Apr 2, 2002
1,127
19
Visit site
✟1,762.00
Faith
Protestant
pantsman52 said:
A4C said:
The thing that is interesting about "science" is that "it" says "It is right because we say it is right"
No proof
No observation
Just "well it happened this way because the only other way would be creation and because science cannot be religious it definately wasn't created."
The thing that is interesting about "christianity" is that "it" says "It is right because we say it is right"
No proof
No observation
Just "well it happened this way because the only other way would be evolution and because christianity cannot accept evolution, life definately didn't evolve."
Interesting parallel of similar oversimplifications. Although both statements are false (since both science and Christianity rely upon both proof and observation), it should probably be noted that proof and observation are critical components of the foundation of both science and the scientific method.

To the extent Christianity may be classified as a religion, philosophy or belief system, it would probably not be as dependent upon absolute proof or observation, but could also rely upon faith. However, it might also be observed that faith that is supported by observation and proof tends to grow stronger, while faith that is contrary to observation and proof may tend to be delusional.
 
Upvote 0

GodsSamus

Well-Known Member
May 3, 2005
618
4
39
San Antonio, Texas
✟15,804.00
Faith
Christian
Politics
US-Republican
Praxiteles said:
OK, first off, cosmology is not atheism. More Christians than atheists accept the Big Bang based on the evidence (red shift, COBE etc).

Secondly, could you please apologise for conflating cosmological theories with biological ones?

Thirdly, why are we here? I don't know.

How come 3 of the planets have retrograde rotation with NO evidence for a collision?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

GodsSamus

Well-Known Member
May 3, 2005
618
4
39
San Antonio, Texas
✟15,804.00
Faith
Christian
Politics
US-Republican
L'Anatra said:
What does the rotation of the planets have to do with the Big Bang Theory?

Here's a hint: NOTHING

The Law of the conservation of angular momentum. Not only this, but some of the moons rotate backwards. Additionally, several of the moons ORBIT backwards around their respective planet. Also, how did a closed system, namely the universe, come from a state of disorder to order? Isn't there a second law of thermodynamics in there somewhere? Or are you going to say the whole universe is actually an open system?
 
Upvote 0

L'Anatra

Contributor
Dec 29, 2002
678
27
39
Pensacola, FL
Visit site
✟969.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
GodsSamus said:
The Law of the conservation of angular momentum. Not only this, but some of the moons rotate backwards.
The Law of Conservation of Angular Momentum does not have anything to do with the Big Bang. The Big Bang was not an explosion in the universe, but rather an expansion of the universe itself.

Additionally, several of the moons ORBIT backwards around their respective planet.
Yeah. Pretty cool, huh?

Also, how did a closed system, namely the universe, come from a state of disorder to order? Isn't there a second law of thermodynamics in there somewhere? Or are you going to say the whole universe is actually an open system?
The universe is no more ordered now than it was at the beginning. Do you even know what the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics states?

The whole universe is very likely a closed system, but I'm not sure whether we know or not.
 
Upvote 0

GodsSamus

Well-Known Member
May 3, 2005
618
4
39
San Antonio, Texas
✟15,804.00
Faith
Christian
Politics
US-Republican
L'Anatra said:
The Law of Conservation of Angular Momentum does not have anything to do with the Big Bang. The Big Bang was not an explosion in the universe, but rather an expansion of the universe itself.


Yeah. Pretty cool, huh?


The universe is no more ordered now than it was at the beginning. Do you even know what the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics states?

The whole universe is very likely a closed system, but I'm not sure whether we know or not.

So how come we find radiation in the universe that's attributed to the Big Dud, sorry Big Bang.

Pretty cool? If the Big Bang were true, this shouldn't occur. If the universe was always in existence, why do we have stars?

Btw, the 2LoT says a closed system MUST fall into more disorder unless energy is put into organizing it. For instance, my computer will fall apart unless I take care of it.
 
Upvote 0

L'Anatra

Contributor
Dec 29, 2002
678
27
39
Pensacola, FL
Visit site
✟969.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
GodsSamus said:
So how come we find radiation in the universe that's attributed to the Big Dud, sorry Big Bang.

Pretty cool? If the Big Bang were true, this shouldn't occur. If the universe was always in existence, why do we have stars?
Do you honestly think cosmologists and astronomers who accept the Big Bang Theory are unaware that moons orbit their planets in a retrograde fashion? The Big Bang most certainly does not state that the universe was always in existence.

The Big Bang was first posited by a Christian. The accepted model in his time in the scientific community was that of a steady-state universe that has always existed. The Big Bang Theory, however, asserts that the universe had a beginning.

Btw, the 2LoT says a closed system MUST fall into more disorder unless energy is put into organizing it. For instance, my computer will fall apart unless I take care of it.
Your computer falling apart has nothing to do with thermodynamics.
 
Upvote 0

Elduran

Disruptive influence
May 19, 2005
1,773
64
41
✟9,830.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
GodsSamus said:
Pretty cool? If the Big Bang were true, this shouldn't occur. If the universe was always in existence, why do we have stars?

Why exactly shouldn't this occur? Present some reasoning! By the way, stating it over and over again doesn't count as reasoning ;)

Btw, the 2LoT says a closed system MUST fall into more disorder unless energy is put into organizing it. For instance, my computer will fall apart unless I take care of it.

Your computer's degradation is not a particularly good example of entropy increasing. The 2LoT applies to energy systems (chemical, potential, etc) and not strictly speaking to matter, except in certain circumstances where the two happen to coincide.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Physics_guy

Well-Known Member
Dec 11, 2003
1,208
66
✟1,687.00
The Law of the conservation of angular momentum.

Pretty sure you don't understand it - nor do you understand the Solar System development models.

Hint: the Solar System formed many billions of years after the Big Bang first started expanding.

Not only this, but some of the moons rotate backwards.

And this is no way unexpected in a stellar gas accretion model. Particularly because many were likely formed from collisions.

Also, how did a closed system, namely the universe, come from a state of disorder to order?

It didn't. The entropy of the Universe at the instant of the Big Bang was vastly lower than it is now. Guess you would have to know what entropy actually is to understand this though. Hint: entropy is not disorder.

isn't there a second law of thermodynamics in there somewhere?

Certainly is, but your representation of it shows not only that you do not understand it, but you do not understand the Big Bang either.

Or are you going to say the whole universe is actually an open system?

It actually might be - though I doubt you will understand this. One thing you need to understand however, is that the volume of the Universe is not static, therefore, the amount of available microstates of the system is changing.

Btw, the 2LoT says a closed system MUST fall into more disorder unless energy is put into organizing it.

Actually, the 2nd Law says nothing about disorder. It does say, however, that the amount of energy in a closed system available to do work will decrease.

For instance, my computer will fall apart unless I take care of it.

Hate to break this to you, but (1) that is not what the 2nd Law says, and (2) regardless of how much effort you exert or thought you invoke, you are incapable of decreasing total entropy. Intelligence does not overcome the 2nd Law, it simply allows for localized decreases in entropy at the expense of the environment. Funny, that is pretty much exactly what non-intelligent systems do as well.
 
Upvote 0

f U z ! o N

I fall like a sparrow and fly like a kite
Apr 20, 2005
1,340
59
36
Neptune
✟1,895.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
A4C said:
The thing that is interesting about "science" is that "it" says "It is right because we say it is right"
No proof
No observation
Just "well it happened this way because the only other way would be creation and because science cannot be religious it definately wasn't created."

If anybody can show me that that sort of thing is honest (or even scientific for that matter) then I will withdraw my remarks about "lies"
well that argument fails because we haven't witnessed how old the earth really is.
we have no proof and no observation as YEC's and such
so trying to argue with evolutionists about that won't work.
because we as Christians believe this because the bible says so. see my point?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

L'Anatra

Contributor
Dec 29, 2002
678
27
39
Pensacola, FL
Visit site
✟969.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
mutantleader said:
Did Noah have dinosaurs on his ark? And kangaroos?
Well, that depends on who you ask...

What was there before the big bang?
There was no "before the Big Bang." The Big Bang is when time began.
 
Upvote 0