all other religions that I have studied are altrustic, and they have many things in common.
I agree with this statement almost completely. There are many beautiful things that are offered to us from other faiths. The concentration of Zen Buddahism, the prayer life of Islam, the respect for nature inherent in most pantheotic faiths. The problem arises, though, in the additions to altruism.
The problem as I see it is in the motivation. Much modern Christianity preaches that
all that matters is a personal relationship with Christ and
your interpretation of scripture. To help others is an after effect and not at all necessary, strictly speaking. The best way to help someone is to teach them to have a
personal relationship with Christ.
The same self-centered undercurrent can be found in most other faiths. In the pantheotic faiths the gods are manipulated through chants or magic. Eastern mysticism teaches one to help others as a means to gain liberation, the ultimate goal being the state Mushin in Japanese, No Mind. This state is the realization that all is an illusion; an apparent form taken by formlessness. The desire to help someone then stems not from love, but from a desire for balance.
To the early Chinese, the Tao was the unknowable and the ineffable. To a Christian, the Tao decided to become known.
To a Christian, the life of God is in its essence love. The commandment of Christ was to love God with all of your heart, and your neighbor as yourself. St. Paul says that if one has a faith to move mountains, but not love, then that man has nothing. By living out a finite love on earth, we hope to share in an infinite love in Heaven.
That, to me, is the bare bones of it all. The other dogmas of the faith are necessarily true because of love. I hope I haven't confused everyone too badly. I know my thoughts aren't clear at points, but I tried to explain them anyway. What do ya'll think?
Neal