What is "blasphemy" in God's eyes?

dialogue

parrhesiastes
Dec 12, 2003
558
19
43
✟8,363.00
I know, non of you are G-d, so I am just asking for your personal understanding :) Please share.

Many have suggested that blasphemy is acts of "impertinent", then they go on to explain to me that it is "basically one who is presented with the Truth of Jesus and yet refuses to accept it..."

Do you all agree? If so:

Where do we draw the line? How do you know what is presented to you is "the Truth"?

When I reject Santa Claus, am I being impertinent?

Have you ever received spam e-mails from family and friends that says, "pass this to all address on your mailing list, or you will be cursed with so and so; and if you pass it on, you can win a prize and solve starvation in Africa?"

I have received plenty, I don't pass them on. Am I being impertinent?

I live in a time and society where we are overloaded with info: good info and bad info. How do I know which claim is true?

Please don't be offended, I am just being honest about my personal experiences: the heaven/hell bribe/blackmail thing instantaneously set my BS-detector off; I also witness too much disagreement among different denominations of Christianity, or even within the same denomination... and yet they all claim their own version is "the truth", and whoever disagree with them are destined for hell.

Can you honestly label anyone as being "impertinent" for rejecting these claims? To me, it is part of my personal responsibility to carefully analyse what I accept as I swim through the sea of propaganda. To not do so would probably turn me into a full blown materialistic anorexic homophobic racist capitalist, and I don't think I could blame the TV or the internet for my "bad decisions". So why do so many theists whack atheists for being skeptical?

-Cordelia
 

JeffreyLloyd

Ave Maria, Gratia plena!
Site Supporter
Mar 5, 2003
19,896
1,066
Michigan
Visit site
✟75,991.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
dialogue said:
I know, non of you are G-d, so I am just asking for your personal understanding :) Please share.

The dictionary says it is "the act of insulting or showing contempt or lack of reverence for God or the act of claiming the attributes of God."

I'd go with that.

dialogue said:
Many have suggested that blasphemy is acts of "impertinent", then they go on to explain to me that it is "basically one who is presented with the Truth of Jesus and yet refuses to accept it..."

Do you all agree?

Yes I do. I would consider that blasphemy against the Holy Spirit.

dialogue said:
If so:

Where do we draw the line? How do you know what is presented to you is "the Truth"?

We look at Sacred Tradition and Sacred Scripture.

dialogue said:
When I reject Santa Claus, am I being impertinent?

No, you are not being impertinent at all.

dialogue said:
Have you ever received spam e-mails from family and friends that says, "pass this to all address on your mailing list, or you will be cursed with so and so; and if you pass it on, you can win a prize and solve starvation in Africa?"

I have received plenty, I don't pass them on. Am I being impertinent?

No, you are saving your friends from that evil spam :) I get spam that says, "if you don't pass this along to x amount of people, you don't love Jesus :rolleyes: . I have no doubt of my love for Christ as i hit the delete button.

dialogue said:
I live in a time and society where we are overloaded with info: good info and bad info. How do I know which claim is true?

That is a hard question. That is why, as Catholics we believe God has given us the Church as an authority.

dialogue said:
Please don't be offended, I am just being honest about my personal experiences: the heaven/hell bribe/blackmail thing instantaneously set my BS-detector off; I also witness too much disagreement among different denominations of Christianity, or even within the same denomination... and yet they all claim their own version is "the truth", and whoever disagree with them are destined for hell.

God never wanted denominations.

dialogue said:
Can you honestly label anyone as being "impertinent" for rejecting these claims? To me, it is part of my personal responsibility to carefully analyse what I accept as I swim through the sea of propaganda. To not do so would probably turn me into a full blown materialistic anorexic homophobic racist capitalist, and I don't think I could blame the TV or the internet for my "bad decisions". So why do so many theists whack atheists for being skeptical?= -Cordelia

It's not that we "whack atheists for being skeptical" - we tend to get upset when they said we are stupid for having faith.
 
Upvote 0

dialogue

parrhesiastes
Dec 12, 2003
558
19
43
✟8,363.00
Hi Jeffrey :wave:

JeffreyLloyd said:
The dictionary says it is "the act of insulting or showing contempt or lack of reverence for God or the act of claiming the attributes of God."

I'd go with that.

That sounds like a good definition. Now, what if you are not convinced by the claims people make about G-d? You can't have reverence for something you believe not to exist, is that blasphemous?


JeffreyLloyd said:
Yes I do. I would consider that blasphemy against the Holy Spirit.

Do you imply it is blasphemous to reject claims that defies reasons and logic?

for instance, I can accept a man called Jesus Christ lived 2004 years ago and that he was a good man; but I find it hard to accept that he walked on water and turned water into wine and rose from death etc, just because people 2000 years ago believed he did and wrote down so. Is it blasphemous to reject these claims?


JeffreyLloyd said:
We look at Sacred Tradition and Sacred Scripture.
But how do we decide whether they are "Sacred"? As far as I know, all "evidences" presented to me so far are written and edited and translated by men; men are not infallible, nor are they objective recording devices. How do I know if their claims are accurate?



JeffreyLloyd said:
That is a hard question. That is why, as Catholics we believe God has given us the Church as an authority.

I am glad you have found your answer, unfortunatelly that doesn't help a non-believer make her decision.


JeffreyLloyd said:
God never wanted denominations.

But yet there they are, and they all claim to be "the truth", and not only do the denomination's teaching contradict each other's; the follower's actions also contradict [my understanding of] teaching of Christ.

Is it unreasonable to feel doubtful about the motives/teachings of these institutions?


JeffreyLloyd said:
It's not that we "whack atheists for being skeptical" - we tend to get upset when they said we are stupid for having faith.

Understandably so, and I think that's a horrible shame. Many atheists seem to forget their position is also based on faith. (Well, I know mine is, anyway)

Thank you for the kind and (unexpectedly) civil response.

-Cordelia
 
Upvote 0

MinDach

Active Member
Dec 23, 2003
249
35
USA
✟888.00
Faith
Christian
Yes MinDach, I am aware of that part in the Bible, but that tells me nothing about what blasphemy is.

Sorry I did not know what you were saying.



different denominations of Christianity, or even within the same denomination... and yet they all claim their own version is "the truth", and whoever disagree with them are destined for hell.

All denomination have disgreements, about what different things say in the Bible, But they all have ONE thing in common, and that is Jesus Christ. I do not believe any thing else matters. If one church wants to believe one way and the other another, who really cares. I don't.
 
Upvote 0

seebs

God Made Me A Skeptic
Apr 9, 2002
31,914
1,529
18
Saint Paul, MN
Visit site
✟55,225.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
dialogue said:
and yet they all claim their own version is "the truth", and whoever disagree with them are destined for hell.

Not all of them, actually. :)

Anyway, your point is well taken. Mark Twain once said:

"No, it is not blasphemy. If God is as vast as that, he is above blasphemy; if He is as little as that, He is beneath it."
 
Upvote 0

dialogue

parrhesiastes
Dec 12, 2003
558
19
43
✟8,363.00
seebs said:
Not all of them, actually. :)

Ok, my bad. That's a blanket statement.

seebs said:
Anyway, your point is well taken. Mark Twain once said:

"No, it is not blasphemy. If God is as vast as that, he is above blasphemy; if He is as little as that, He is beneath it."

Then tell me, Seebs, what is blasphemy? What exactly is unforgivable in your G-d's eyes?

-Cordelia
 
Upvote 0

dialogue

parrhesiastes
Dec 12, 2003
558
19
43
✟8,363.00
MinDach said:
All denomination have disgreements, about what different things say in the Bible, But they all have ONE thing in common, and that is Jesus Christ. I do not believe any thing else matters. If one church wants to believe one way and the other another, who really cares. I don't.

I would probably get whacked for asking this here, but it occurs to me that Jesus never said anything about homosexuality. Is that to say all the Christian squabbles about homosexuality are unimportant and can be ignored?

-Cordelia
 
Upvote 0

Serapha

Well-Known Member
Jun 29, 2003
5,133
28
✟6,704.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Hi there!

:wave:

Sometimes it is better to go back to original language where it was written. Many times, in doing this, one will find that a "concept" is translated to be a single word. In the Old Testament Hebrew the word is only used five times and is not translated to be blasphemy in every case, but is also translated at times to mean "contempt". In the New Testament Greek, the term is used many more times, and the meaning leans more toward the divine nature of God.

More specifically, and maybe a better rendering of the translation is:



1) slander, detraction, speech injurious, to another's good name 2) impious and reproachful speech injurious to divine majesty

(http://www.blueletterbible.org/tmp_dir/words/1072792793-3988.html)



Also,
Vine's Expository Dictionary of New Testament Words
Topic: Blaspheme, Blasphemy, Blasphemer, Blasphemous

[size=+1]<A-1,Noun,988,blasphemia> [/size]
either from blax, "sluggish, stupid," or, probably, from blapto, "to injure," and pheme, "speech," (Eng. "blasphemy") is so translated thirteen times in the RV, but "railing" in Matt. 15:19; Mark 7:22; Eph. 4:31; Col. 3:8; 1 Tim. 6:4; Jude 1:9. The word "blasphemy" is practically confined to speech defamatory of the Divine Majesty. See Note, below. See EVIL SPEAKING, RAILING.


[size=+1]<B-1,Verb,987,blasphemeo> [/size]
"to blaspheme, rail at or revile," is used (a) in a general way, of any contumelious speech, reviling, calumniating, railing at, etc., as of those who railed at Christ, e.g., Matt. 27:39; Mark 15:29; Luke 22:65 (RV, "reviling"); Luke 23:39; (b) of those who speak contemptuously of God or of sacred things, e.g., Matt. 9:3; Mark 3:28; Rom. 2:24; 1 Tim. 1:20; 6:1; Rev. 13:6; 16:9,11,21; "hath spoken blasphemy," Matt. 26:65; "rail at," 2 Pet. 2:10; Jude 1:8,10; "railing," 2 Pet. 2:12; "slanderously reported," Rom. 3:8; "be evil spoken of," Rom. 14:16; 1 Cor. 10:30; 2 Pet. 2:2; "speak evil of," Titus 3:2; 1 Pet. 4:4; "being defamed," 1 Cor. 4:13. The verb (in the present participial form) is translated "blasphemers" in Acts 19:37; in Mark 2:7, "blasphemeth," RV, for AV, "speaketh blasphemies."

There is no noun in the original representing the English "blasphemer." This is expressed either by the verb, or by the adjective blasphemos. See DEFAME, RAIL, REPORT, REVILE.

[size=+1]<C-1,Adjective,989,blasphemos> [/size]
"abusive, speaking evil," is translated "blasphemous," in Acts 6:11,13; "a blasphemer," 1 Tim. 1:13; "railers," 2 Tim. 3:2, RV; "railing," 2 Pet. 2:11. See RAIL. Note: As to Christ's teaching concerning "blasphemy" against the Holy Spirit, e.g., Matt. 12:32, that anyone, with the evidence of the Lord's power before His eyes, should declare it to be Satanic, exhibited a condition of heart beyond Divine illumination and therefore hopeless. Divine forgiveness would be inconsistent with the moral nature of God. As to the Son of Man, in his state of humiliation, there might be misunderstanding, but not so with the Holy Spirit's power demonstrated.



~serapha~
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

MinDach

Active Member
Dec 23, 2003
249
35
USA
✟888.00
Faith
Christian
but it occurs to me that Jesus never said anything about homosexuality. Is that to say all the Christian squabbles about homosexuality are unimportant and can be ignored

The Bible has a lot to say about homosexuality, but that not what the true churchs disgree about. The have disgreement about, should we have a tree or not, or Christmas ,should we worship on Sat or Sun. Or Blood tranfusion. Should we just eat Veg, should we pray to saints or to Mary.,and a whole lot of other stuff. But when you get in to the area of should people sleep together before marraige or homosexuality, ALL the true Chruch pretty much agree that its a NO NO. And if you find a church are saying it OK, well you will not catch me going thru there door.
 
Upvote 0

MinDach

Active Member
Dec 23, 2003
249
35
USA
✟888.00
Faith
Christian
Plus I should say, so people will not taken me wrong and think I am just down on homosexuality people, I have a son who is Homosexual, I love him very much, and get a long with his partner just great. They come to my house all the time. But as much as I love him, I can not save him, he knows about God, its his choice, I pray for him every day. So yes I do know about Homosexual, I am not talk from the outside, but from the inside. If any Church says Homosexuality is ok you better run from it and not walk.
 
Upvote 0

cindylou

Active Member
Sep 2, 2003
116
19
56
Northern PA
Visit site
✟7,901.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
dialogue said:
Many have suggested that blasphemy is acts of "impertinent", then they go on to explain to me that it is "basically one who is presented with the Truth of Jesus and yet refuses to accept it..."



-Cordelia
Cordelia,
A general definition of "blasphemy" is this: " It consists in uttering against God- inwardly or outwardly- words of hatred, reproach, or defiance; in speaking ill of God; in failing in respect toward Him in one's speech; in misusing God's name......The prohibition of blasphemy extends to language against Christ's Church, the saints, and sacred things. It is also blasphemous to make use of God's name to cover up criminal practices, to reduce peoples to servitude, to torture persons or put them to death. The misuse of God's name to commit a crime can provoke others to repudiate religion." (CCC 2148)

Blasphemy of the Holy Spirit is another matter. This is the only unforgivable sin.

What your friends have called impertinance is really IMPENITENCE. Impenitence is deliberately refusing to accept God's mercy by repenting. In other words, "anyone who deliberately refuses to accept His mercy by repenting, rejects the forgiveness of his sins and the salvation offered by the Holy Spirit." (CCC 1864)

Hope this helps.
Cindy
 
Upvote 0

Rafael

Only time enough for love
Jul 25, 2002
2,570
319
73
Midwest
Visit site
✟6,445.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Asking questions about God is not blashphemy, or even blaspheming Jesus out of ignorance, but when the Spirit of truth comes to a man with realization and revelation of truth about God and His Son's work for man, and then the free gift is rejected and the blood of God's Son is trampled - the result is blasphemy against the Spirit of Truth, God's Holy Spirit.

Matthew 12:31 Wherefore I say unto you, All manner of sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven unto men: but the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost shall not be forgiven unto men.
32 And whosoever speaketh a word against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him: but whosoever speaketh against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world, neither in the world to come.
 
Upvote 0

seebs

God Made Me A Skeptic
Apr 9, 2002
31,914
1,529
18
Saint Paul, MN
Visit site
✟55,225.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
dialogue said:
Then tell me, Seebs, what is blasphemy? What exactly is unforgivable in your G-d's eyes?

These are actually two separate questions, with the overlap being "blasphemy of the Holy Spirit".

I have no idea what it is. There's a great deal of literature on the question, and we don't know. But I think plain-old blasphemy isn't the same as blasphemy of the Holy Spirit.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums