I know, non of you are G-d, so I am just asking for your personal understanding Please share.
Many have suggested that blasphemy is acts of "impertinent", then they go on to explain to me that it is "basically one who is presented with the Truth of Jesus and yet refuses to accept it..."
Do you all agree? If so:
Where do we draw the line? How do you know what is presented to you is "the Truth"?
When I reject Santa Claus, am I being impertinent?
Have you ever received spam e-mails from family and friends that says, "pass this to all address on your mailing list, or you will be cursed with so and so; and if you pass it on, you can win a prize and solve starvation in Africa?"
I have received plenty, I don't pass them on. Am I being impertinent?
I live in a time and society where we are overloaded with info: good info and bad info. How do I know which claim is true?
Please don't be offended, I am just being honest about my personal experiences: the heaven/hell bribe/blackmail thing instantaneously set my BS-detector off; I also witness too much disagreement among different denominations of Christianity, or even within the same denomination... and yet they all claim their own version is "the truth", and whoever disagree with them are destined for hell.
Can you honestly label anyone as being "impertinent" for rejecting these claims? To me, it is part of my personal responsibility to carefully analyse what I accept as I swim through the sea of propaganda. To not do so would probably turn me into a full blown materialistic anorexic homophobic racist capitalist, and I don't think I could blame the TV or the internet for my "bad decisions". So why do so many theists whack atheists for being skeptical?
-Cordelia
Many have suggested that blasphemy is acts of "impertinent", then they go on to explain to me that it is "basically one who is presented with the Truth of Jesus and yet refuses to accept it..."
Do you all agree? If so:
Where do we draw the line? How do you know what is presented to you is "the Truth"?
When I reject Santa Claus, am I being impertinent?
Have you ever received spam e-mails from family and friends that says, "pass this to all address on your mailing list, or you will be cursed with so and so; and if you pass it on, you can win a prize and solve starvation in Africa?"
I have received plenty, I don't pass them on. Am I being impertinent?
I live in a time and society where we are overloaded with info: good info and bad info. How do I know which claim is true?
Please don't be offended, I am just being honest about my personal experiences: the heaven/hell bribe/blackmail thing instantaneously set my BS-detector off; I also witness too much disagreement among different denominations of Christianity, or even within the same denomination... and yet they all claim their own version is "the truth", and whoever disagree with them are destined for hell.
Can you honestly label anyone as being "impertinent" for rejecting these claims? To me, it is part of my personal responsibility to carefully analyse what I accept as I swim through the sea of propaganda. To not do so would probably turn me into a full blown materialistic anorexic homophobic racist capitalist, and I don't think I could blame the TV or the internet for my "bad decisions". So why do so many theists whack atheists for being skeptical?
-Cordelia