It is just simply not true that futurists are being attacked.
For the most part here, we have evangelicals talking to evangelicals. We have two different views on bible prophecy being exchanged.
From my experience, pre-trib rapturists are always "being attacked" whenever a post trib person or an amillennialists comes along and shares his/her views. C'mon. We can respect each other and honor each other better than that.
Personally, I have rarely posted on a thread that wasn't started by some futurist who was asking preterists for their views.
Perhaps if a futurist wants an "exclusive thread" started where they only talk to like-minded rapturists they could use the "IGNORE" button or state that they do not want opposing opinions -- i.e., state that in the opening post.
However, if that is NOT declared then why shouldn't a preterist give his or her opinion on why there is no literal 1000 years (the mainstream Christian view for 20 centuries)? Why shouldn't a preterist discuss a thread on "The Mark" which has been everthing from the stamp act of the 1700s to the bar codes on cereal boxes to the id chip? Why shouldn't a preterist suggest that the great tribulation is past, which is a view held by the Catholic Church, the Reformers, and even John Wesley and F.F. Bruce???
For the most part here, we have evangelicals talking to evangelicals. We have two different views on bible prophecy being exchanged.
From my experience, pre-trib rapturists are always "being attacked" whenever a post trib person or an amillennialists comes along and shares his/her views. C'mon. We can respect each other and honor each other better than that.
Personally, I have rarely posted on a thread that wasn't started by some futurist who was asking preterists for their views.
Perhaps if a futurist wants an "exclusive thread" started where they only talk to like-minded rapturists they could use the "IGNORE" button or state that they do not want opposing opinions -- i.e., state that in the opening post.
However, if that is NOT declared then why shouldn't a preterist give his or her opinion on why there is no literal 1000 years (the mainstream Christian view for 20 centuries)? Why shouldn't a preterist discuss a thread on "The Mark" which has been everthing from the stamp act of the 1700s to the bar codes on cereal boxes to the id chip? Why shouldn't a preterist suggest that the great tribulation is past, which is a view held by the Catholic Church, the Reformers, and even John Wesley and F.F. Bruce???
Upvote
0