the_malevolent_milk_man said:/mod hat... err viking horned helmet on
Where do I sign up for the pillaging and plundering?
at the nearest recruiting office.
Upvote
0
the_malevolent_milk_man said:/mod hat... err viking horned helmet on
Where do I sign up for the pillaging and plundering?
by shooting someone in handcuffs in the head?MichaelFJF said:Making the decision to go to war should be a moral one. Once you're there, not much is moral. It's about survival and following orders. M
CAMP PENDLETON, Calif. - Two Marines here negligent-homicide charges in the death of an Iraqi prisoner who had been left alone with other prisoners in that country after being interrogated, Marine officers said yesterday. Six other Marines are charged with hitting and kicking prisoners and then lying about their behavior to military investigators. All eight belong to the 2nd Battalion, 25th Marine Regiment.
Maj. Clark A. Paulus and Lance Cpl. Christian Hernandez face negligent-homicide charges in the death of a 52-year-old Iraqi prisoner found dead in June at a prisoner camp run by the 1st Marine Division near the central Iraqi town of Nasiriyah.
The prisoner reportedly was left with other prisoners after being interrogated by U.S. military and intelligence personnel.
"My client is a Marine, and like all Marines, is a good combat soldier," said Donald Rehkopf Jr., who represents Lance Cpl. William Roy, accused of hitting and kicking prisoners. "My client denies the charges against him, and we will vigorously defend them in court."
Rehkopf, co-chairman of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers' Military Law Committee, blamed the military for not providing training to the Marines on how to handle prisoners.
A Marine Corps spokesman released a list of names of those accused and their charges, but declined to comment further.
Three of the Marines have been ordered to a court-martial: Sgt. Albert Rodriguez-Martinez, charged with two counts of assault and one of lying; Lance Cpl. Andrew D. Rodney, charged with assault; and Lance Cpl. Konstantin Mikholap, charged with lying and two counts of assault.
The other Marines are charged but awaiting an Article 32 hearing, which will decide whether they will stand trial.
They include Paulus, charged with negligent homicide, assault, lying, cruelty and two counts of dereliction of duty; Hernandez, charged with negligent homicide, cruelty, dereliction of duty, and three counts of assault; Sgt. Gary Pittman, five counts of assault and two of dereliction of duty; and Maj. William F. Vickers, charged with dereliction of duty.
The Los Angeles Times is a Tribune Publishing newspaper.
How accurate are these reports from March about American POWs being executed? I've been trying to find reference to any proof that these reports were ever confirmed. Does anyone have any information to back up these original claims of American soldiers being executed?datan said:by shooting someone in handcuffs in the head?
by destroying someone's livelihood deliberately?
what about the Iraqi POW who was tortured to death?
look at how outraged you were over the issue of reports of Iraqis killing American prisoners:
http://www.christianforums.com/t40654
http://www.christianforums.com/showthread.php?p=750655#post750655
http://www.christianforums.com/showthread.php?p=748549#post748549
now that it's American troops shooting an Iraqi civilian in handcuffs, it's now a question of survival? on the same issue, you take the exact opposite stands depending on which side carries it out. why is that? do you know what hypocritical means?
I think there were some video clips of the bullet holes in their heads floating around.No gods said:How accurate are these reports from March about American POWs being executed? I've been trying to find reference to any proof that these reports were ever confirmed. Does anyone have any information to back up these original claims of American soldiers being executed?
did you read the article on the US military being criticised for their non-investigations of civilians casualties? When higher-ups make it an official policy to not investigate civilian deaths, that sends a message to US troops that civilians casualties will be tolerated as long as there is no media present. What about the guy who died simply because the US troops shot around in a circle after being attacked, without aiming at any targets in a civilian neighbourhood. It's a known US military tactic to respond to attacks by shooting indiscriminately around themselves without concern for civilians. How can you condone this.Driver-X said:UCMJ-Uniform Code of Military Justice
These are individual acts,not every soldier is committing them.
unfortunately nothing will come of this. Remember the prisoners who died in Cuba after alleged torture? There wasn't even an investigation much less a trial. Or the US pilot who bombed Canadian troops in Afghanistan who was let off without so much as a court martial? Or the Reuters cameraman who was shot? Or the Iraqi intepreter to some foreign diplomat who was shot in traffic? Or countless Iraqis killed because stupid US checkpoints were poorly marked? Or the US helicopter crew who removed an Iraqi flag from a tower and incited a riot?Lacmeh said:UUm killing handcuffed prisoners is premediated murder and nothing else. That´s death penalty not some prison term.
Mediated destruction of livelihood of the native citizens is sure a good way to gain the hearts of said natives...
I believe there was video footage of what looked like it could be bullet wounds that would be expected from but not limited to execution style shootings. However, I can find no confirmation that this video footage was of actual executed soldiers. Can anyone provide any updated information on this issue?datan said:I think there were some video clips of the bullet holes in their heads floating around.
In my case, posts like this, which attack other members for no good reason, are getting old.datan said:what is getting old? War crimes in Iraq? you too eager to sweep it under the rag and 'let's move on. nothing to see here'?
You know perfectly well that's not what I'm saying. I'm saying that brutality in our posts is wrong, too, and accomplishes nothing. No one changes their mind when verbally abusive tactics are used.the_malevolent_milk_man said:So datan should just say "Oh, my bad. Go ahead and kill, torture, or deny rights to all the civillians you want. Don't bother punishing the soldiers, I trust them all."
he started the attacks with "wow this is getting old guys. come on", which implies that our concerns are frivolous. I don't see you criticising him.Plan 9 said:In my case, posts like this, which attack other members for no good reason, are getting old.
So you harm people with a war of words; how is that any less wrong than the "crimes" you so deplore?
There is a downside to the fact that the pen is mightier than the sword. Words have power; we have as great a responsiblity to try to limit the hurt we cause innocent people with them as does any army with its weapons.
datan said:let's see what the Bush apologists have to say about this
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1101031027-524475-3,00.html
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/1012-01.htm
http://abcnews.go.com/wire/World/ap20031020_1344.html
datan said:he started the attacks with "wow this is getting old guys. come on", which implies that our concerns are frivolous. I don't see you criticising him.