Corporate cash backs Bush inaugural bash.

Johnboy60

Looking For Interesting News.
Dec 28, 2003
15,455
3,130
Tennessee
✟306,929.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
What do America's
big companies get
for all that money?

Blues legend B.B. King performed Tuesday night at a private affair closed to the public, but NBC managed to get a camera inside — to capture politicians partying, courtesy of some of the biggest companies in America.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6844539/


Robert
 

BlessedMan

Veteran
Apr 29, 2004
1,693
104
52
✟9,838.00
Faith
Christian
Robert43 said:
What do America's
big companies get
for all that money?

Blues legend B.B. King performed Tuesday night at a private affair closed to the public, but NBC managed to get a camera inside — to capture politicians partying, courtesy of some of the biggest companies in America.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6844539/


Robert

Would you rather it be tax payer money paying for the inauguration? Has it been different this time than any other?
 
Upvote 0

Dracil

Well-Known Member
Dec 25, 2003
5,005
245
San Francisco
✟16,707.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
But one congressman has no use for complaints about corporate-funded celebrations.

"Anybody who is against that obviously must be a communist," says Rep. James Gibbons, R-Nev.

Ooh, someone played the communist card!
 
Upvote 0

HumbleMan

Ragamuffin
Dec 2, 2003
5,258
273
Mississippi by way of Texas
✟17,870.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
BlessedMan said:
Would you rather it be tax payer money paying for the inauguration? Has it been different this time than any other?

I don't think tax payers should have to pay. I think that in this time of high unemployment, war, outsourcing of jobs, and largely unaffordable health insurance, the administration, the one championing itself as the party of the common man, should be a little more modest. Bush already has a reputation of being a sock puppet to corporate America, and this just re-inforces it.
 
Upvote 0

Street Smarts

Well-Known Member
Oct 7, 2004
865
43
✟1,236.00
Faith
Christian
Politics
US-Republican
HumbleMan said:
I don't think tax payers should have to pay. I think that in this time of high unemployment, war, outsourcing of jobs, and largely unaffordable health insurance, the administration, the one championing itself as the party of the common man, should be a little more modest. Bush already has a reputation of being a sock puppet to corporate America, and this just re-inforces it.

Yeah no doubt because we know of all those modest democartic parties that were thrown by the Hollywood Left:doh:
 
Upvote 0

Whistler

Member
Jun 7, 2004
85
3
42
Michigan
✟220.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
BlessedMan said:
Would you rather it be tax payer money paying for the inauguration? Has it been different this time than any other?

We did pay for the inauguration. Not to mention the 12 million dollar tab the DC area will have to cough up for security (I guess that was Bush's way of saying thanks for voting for the other guy).
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
J

jamesrwright3

Guest
Whistler said:
We did pay for the inauguration. Not to mention the 12 million dollar tab the DC area will have to cough up for security (I guess that was Bush's way of saying thanks for voting for the other guy).
Are we to never have another inauguration then? Unless we win the war on terror within the next 4 years, which is highly unlikely, the next inauguration is going to require about the same amount of security.
 
Upvote 0

Whistler

Member
Jun 7, 2004
85
3
42
Michigan
✟220.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
How about having some of Bush's corporate backers to pay for the security. They seemed to have no problem paying for all those frivolous inauguration parties

Or better yet out of respect for the troops and their families why not tone down the celebration. Were in a war that he got us into on the basis of flawed intelligence where now thousands of troops have died, gee doesn't sound like cause for celebration to me.
 
Upvote 0

MaryS

Well-Known Member
Sep 12, 2004
2,350
137
✟3,195.00
Faith
Christian
Politics
US-Republican
If Kerry had won, there would have been just as much security precautions taken to protect the inauguration.

I guess there would have been different supporters of the events. I looked up some of Kerry's top donors from www.opensecrets.org (this doesn't include the 527 committees funds who raised far more for Kerry than Bush)

-University of California

-Harvard University

-Time Warner

-Goldman Sachs

-Citigroup Inc

-Microsoft Corp

-Skadden, Arps et al

-UBS Americas

-JP Morgan Chase & Co

-Wilmer, Cutler et al

-Stanford University

-IBM Corp

-Morgan Stanley

-Robins, Kaplan et al

-Viacom Inc

-Bank of America

-Piper Rudnick Llp

-Columbia University

-Akin, Gump et al

-Lawyers/Law Firms

-Securities & Investment

-Health Professionals

-Real Estate

-TV/Movies/Music

-Printing & Publishing

-Computers/Internet

-Misc Finance

-Hospitals/Nursing Homes

-Commercial Banks

-Non-Profit Institutions

-Insurance
 
Upvote 0