If evolution is true...

Tomk80 said:
So you're saying evolution doesn't occur then?
Tsk. Quote mining. The favourite tactic of evilushoenists.

Get back to me when you see a shoe turning into a monkey. And furthermore, if there are shoes, why are there still monkeys? Huh?
 
Upvote 0
smog said:
I smell a conspiracy.

Edit: oh wait nevermind that's just my feet
But there *is* a conspiracy. The evocobblers are afraid they'll lose their funding and leather uppers if the truth (er... sorry, that should be "TRUTH") ever gets out.
 
Upvote 0

smog

Senior Member
Sep 22, 2004
536
36
39
✟15,856.00
Faith
Atheist
Praxiteles said:
Get back to me when you see a shoe turning into a monkey. And furthermore, if there are shoes, why are there still monkeys? Huh?

Because the rate at which monkeys evolve into shoes is equal to the rate at which shoes evolve into monkeys, forming a shoe-monkey equilibrium.
 
Upvote 0
smog said:
Because the rate at which monkeys evolve into shoes is equal to the rate at which shoes evolve into monkeys, forming a shoe-monkey equilibrium.
But that's not evolution - that's DEvolution, which proves that it's a lie and a fraud and a conspiracy and evil and a lie. Plus, there are no transishoenals, excpet one with was a fraud and turned out to be a pig's shoe!
 
Upvote 0

Orihalcon

crazy dancing santa mage
Nov 17, 2002
595
3
Visit site
✟833.00
Praxiteles said:
But that's not evolution - that's DEvolution, which proves that it's a lie and a fraud and a conspiracy and evil and a lie. Plus, there are no transishoenals, excpet one with was a fraud and turned out to be a pig's shoe!

yeah but how do you explain all the new species of high heels that keep popping up every season?
 
Upvote 0

Herman Hedning

Hiking is fun
Mar 2, 2004
503,922
1,572
N 57° 44', E 12° 00'
Visit site
✟732,803.00
Faith
Humanist
Orihalcon said:
yeah but how do you explain all the new species of high heels that keep popping up every season?
Simple, that's just micro-shoevolution. Macro-shoevolution has never been proven and is a lie anyways. Shoes can't shoevolve beyond size 9 and that is a proven fact. So there!
 
Upvote 0

Orihalcon

crazy dancing santa mage
Nov 17, 2002
595
3
Visit site
✟833.00
i have proof of macro-evolution!
1. a basic pre-shoe, or pseudo-shoe.
2. here you see a few variations, or micro-evolution progressions of the above.

the one at the top seems to have branched off again into 2 variants, 3 and 4.
5. it is possible they have cross-bred to produce this taller variant.
6. this has turned into an extreme. clearly, 6 and 1 are no longer compatible with each other, and thus we have a new species.
 
Upvote 0

smog

Senior Member
Sep 22, 2004
536
36
39
✟15,856.00
Faith
Atheist
Praxiteles said:
But that's not evolution - that's DEvolution, which proves that it's a lie and a fraud and a conspiracy and evil and a lie. Plus, there are no transishoenals, excpet one with was a fraud and turned out to be a pig's shoe!

A monkey evolving into a shoe is evolution. The fact that some shoes are devolving into monkeys is irrelevant. Besides, there clearly are are transishoenals: brown furry shoes, for example.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

WaZoO

~Appeal To Insanity~
Sep 27, 2004
980
93
39
✟1,580.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Private
Sandal_300.jpg

plats1.jpg

gucciloafers.jpg

loafers.jpg


There's a clear transition between sandals and loafers. It couldn't be any more clear.
 
Upvote 0
Orihalcon said:
i have proof of macro-evolution!
1. a basic pre-shoe, or pseudo-shoe.
2. here you see a few variations, or micro-evolution progressions of the above.

the one at the top seems to have branched off again into 2 variants, 3 and 4.
5. it is possible they have cross-bred to produce this taller variant.
6. this has turned into an extreme. clearly, 6 and 1 are no longer compatible with each other, and thus we have a new species.
What's this? Ring speshoes?

So are you claiming that each speshoe can interbreed with it's immediate neighbour, but not with the extremes?
 
Upvote 0
smog said:
A monkey evolving into a shoe is evolution. The fact that some shoes are devolving into monkeys is irrelevant. Besides, there clearly are are transishoenals: brown furry shoes, for example.
But it's still a SHOE!

No-one has found a shoe with a cute furry face and a tail, have they? Shoes that swing from branch to branch?
 
Upvote 0
WaZoO said:
There's a clear transition between sandals and loafers. It couldn't be any more clear.
Your pretty pictures don't impress me. Next thing you'll do, no doubt, is post a picture of a handbag and one of a shoulder bag and claim that that proves relatedness.

Pshaw!

I repeat, pshaw!
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

USincognito

a post by Alan Smithee
Supporter
Dec 25, 2003
42,058
16,810
Dallas
✟870,741.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
But what about developments like gaitors, leggings, crampons (that might be the spikes, not the bladed attachments) and shoephones (hello Agent 99)? None of those things were part of the original sandal/fur foot wrap. Where did they comes from?
 
Upvote 0