Polycarp1
Born-again Liberal Episcopalian
Badfish, you are I think missing the point in re: circular reasoning.
The Bible cannot itself prove that it is inspired and inerrant by itself, because its degree or inspiration and inerrancy are what is in question.
God validates the Bible. If an omnipotent, omniscient God inspired it as an inerrant record of His deeds, then there is an outside source -- Him -- validating it.
This of course leads to the question about what "inspiration" means -- and for that matter what "inerrancy" means in reference to it. Which are being addressed in another thread in this forum.
The Bible cannot itself prove that it is inspired and inerrant by itself, because its degree or inspiration and inerrancy are what is in question.
God validates the Bible. If an omnipotent, omniscient God inspired it as an inerrant record of His deeds, then there is an outside source -- Him -- validating it.
This of course leads to the question about what "inspiration" means -- and for that matter what "inerrancy" means in reference to it. Which are being addressed in another thread in this forum.
Upvote
0