Latest activity Postings About Inventory
-
-
Timtofly replied to the thread Isaiah 65:17-19 relates to the eternal state not some supposed future millennium.Now you are just changing the topic, and not even talking about Scripture, but man's take on history. The OT Covenant did not end in... -
Timtofly replied to the thread Isaiah 65:17-19 relates to the eternal state not some supposed future millennium.The Cross was the last day of the OT Covenant, or do you think the OT Covenant is still in effect until the last day on earth? The OT...
-
Timtofly replied to the thread Isaiah 65:17-19 relates to the eternal state not some supposed future millennium.The GWT Judgment is not the last day of time literally nor figuratively. Jesus never said a "day" is coming. Jesus said hour, and...
-
Timtofly replied to the thread Isaiah 65:17-19 relates to the eternal state not some supposed future millennium.Nope, no one takes the Bible wooden literal. That is just a smoke screen for "I don't care about the soon coming Day of the Lord". It...
-
Timtofly replied to the thread Isaiah 65:17-19 relates to the eternal state not some supposed future millennium.Actually all outside of Christ are dead persons, when it comes to Judgment. Your body is not judged. You as a soul are judged as...
-
Timtofly replied to the thread Isaiah 65:17-19 relates to the eternal state not some supposed future millennium.The GWT Judgment is not even in time, nor a last day. It takes place outside of this creation, and the next creation. So time is...
-
Timtofly replied to the thread Isaiah 65:17-19 relates to the eternal state not some supposed future millennium.So is a thousand years time related. All one thousand of those thousand years represents a year's worth of time. All belong to God as...
-
Timtofly replied to the thread Isaiah 65:17-19 relates to the eternal state not some supposed future millennium.Jesus said that hour was coming and already here: "Verily, verily, I say unto you, The hour is coming, and now is, when the dead...
-
Timtofly replied to the thread A Literal Interpretation of the 70 Weeks that Doesn't Force Anything.While I date the start way earlier than most, I still don't see the end prior to around 50BC. 522BC minus 171BC is only 351 years...
-
Timtofly replied to the thread There is no Rapture.Jerusalem was the last walled city left, but the 3.5 years were not Romans surrounding Jerusalem. They had to fight for many cities in...
-
Timtofly replied to the thread There is no Rapture.This is not even historically accurate. You need to reread your history. Have you ever heard of the year of the 4 emperors? That was...
-
Timtofly replied to the thread Isaiah 65:17-19 relates to the eternal state not some supposed future millennium.That is because most don't place the Second Coming at the right point in Revelation. They have their interpretation tied to a...
-
Timtofly replied to the thread A Literal Interpretation of the 70 Weeks that Doesn't Force Anything.It was also a definite 49 years, and 434 years. Not just 490 years.
-
Timtofly replied to the thread Isaiah 65:17-19 relates to the eternal state not some supposed future millennium."Thanos snap" was the removal of half the population. It was not a removal of sin and death. Thanos is a play on the word Athanasios...
-
Timtofly replied to the thread There is no Rapture.The Second Coming is Jesus physically Coming to earth to complete the 70th week. You say 69 weeks contain 7 years each, but then the...
-
-
Loading…
-
Loading…
-
Loading…