Recent content by possibletarian

Shame, I enjoyed his music.

Thanks for that site, it has plenty of material what I appreciate most is that the video's generally are short and to the point. I'm on Holiday this week so I will make a point of looking through them.

Fair enough :)

You seem to be adding to your posts after I've replied so let me respond to the extra's you put in. Of course they don't I never said they did. That can happen with multiple posts I think you meant convinced, not so sure your sentence makes any sense. I don't believe scripture represents...

Oh I see, No that wasn't my aim at all, of course the writer didn't think it was a real tent or that a god actually struggled stretching the heavens out like throwing a tent over the earth.. Rather I was making the point that they took a very earth centric view of the heavens. To say that god...

I would agree. I would never use it as a science book, though i never said we should.

I'm not expecting anyone to change their mind, people rarely do. And of course I expect people to do a little research.

Well yes, but that was my point.

Then, do you believe the bible explains the expansion of the universe and folding space in these in these scriptures ?

So do you believe that it is referring to the expansion of the universe and folding space ?

Wow, so convincing, I've changed my mind already :scratch:

As someone who's been around a longer time than yourself Silmarien, I can confirm you will continue fighting your way around the meaning of the universe (images of old Monty Python and Red Dwarf episodes suddenly appeared in my head). Isn't it odd that minds work so differently, I see...

So greater faith = points ? We could have even greater faith if he showed one tiny bit of evidence he actually existed. All you seem to have done is provided evidence that man created your god. Where ? Where ? Of course people believed he was resurrected (they still do) but that does not make...

Of course not, and don't be overly worried I was eating jelly babies at the time. It was a tongue in cheek example of the ease at which people can pluck a particular unfalsifiable god out of a hat. A supernatural first causer of course does not have to bear any reality we constrain it to, or be...

See, I don't see that in that passage, unclean animals would not have been considered food by Peter. So far as i can tell the lesson was clear that Peter was not to reject the gentiles as unclean, because god had declared them clean, and so starting Peter's ministry to the gentiles. I don't...