Recent content by PaladinValer

Not a dig at poster Sean611, but I absolutely detest Anglican Ink, which has a habitual tendency to stretch truths and outright lie, and I know this for a fact, having attended all the synods in SC since +Lawrence's schism either as an alternate or merely as a simple participant for the...

A lot less these days, thankfully, and decreasing by the second :) No problem. I did read your comment of the same earlier. My replies are only meant to address the ideas raised. :)

Read my post again...this is a Straw Man.

They are null and void to the fact that the KJV is Anglican and no KJV-O advocate interprets it the way its translators did or the church still does. That is why it is not a true belief.

It is long-proven that it is Junia; Junias was never a name back in the day. Translations of the Holy Scriptures under Vatican Catholic auspices now offer a correct translation. However, she wasn't the only one: Priscilla is another. The arguments against women clergy has very little to offer...

Post 6 again. That question is answered there as well. Furthermore, St. Paul recognizes women apostles, which was the equivalent of bishops at the time.

Well let's all be fair here. The fact that the KJV is based on now-proven-to-be-inferior sources has nothing to do with its translation of those texts. And really, we're talking about inferiority due to accidental scribal insertions of what we would call today "study notes" and "footnotes"...

KJV-Oism has long been debunked as without merit. It is a PRATT idea.

Post 6 in this thread.

Much of what my post wrote preempted his point, so it is null and void.

It is in favor of women's ordination, although it has absolutely no theological application to that affect whatsoever. I'd like to ask again: what is thought of my theological justification on your end?

What is thought of the theological justification found in my reply since there was one offered?

Whereas I completely agree that all decisions must have a theological justification, sometimes, though it is without question far less appealing, a decision like this may be based on a bad premise but the conclusion may still be true. After all, a false premise may still have a truth conclusion...

Jesus may have been a man, but it was more important that He was human...part of Creation, than being male. The male character has value too, but not in the way people think. Because of Genesis 1, we know that both men and women are in the likeness of God equally. Furthermore, both men and...

There is only one tribe that matters: the Holy Church, and all the rightly baptized are members of her.