Recent content by lewiscalledhimmaster

I'm bringing your comment forward, as it has many useful thoughts to consider relative to this post and would like to explore them

It's a scientific theory - a fact which scientists don't need to promote - or defend -- because the evidence is there to explore and challenge - if one has that sort of counter evidence

It's a mistake I made too -- leaving out or adding certain words can sometimes be cata-straw-fic

Faith claims are cute but they are not science

Please don't misqoute me

Debating what is already established as a scientific fact, is pointless. Unless you have an actual scientific argument, for we might debate certain details ( though quite a bit has already been thrashed out here and other threads over the years - Have a careful read through the important...

How do you want to do this? --- point 1* is not even worth discussing, unless you'd like to embellish upon it *- You say that Theistic Evolutionists : '....1. Interpret the Bible allegorically. ....'

Perhaps to some, but not to all It really depends on your level education, both Biblical and Scientific If you haven't already done so - give this thread a careful read --- esp. Papias and Loudmouth's comments

Just cause you say it is Did you read what Loudmouth posted, before you did?

Question 3 Not compatible you say. Is Rogue66 still on this Forum ?

Aye, I'd love to read a definition upon which all Science lovers agree

You wrote : What's the difference between romance and close friends? People say romance isn't sexual. Differences? hmmm okay Close friends feel intimacy but the animal magnetism which is often associated with romance might be absent - close friends can and do become lovers, mates and...

I can't remember

When opposites attract --- science is happy, yet in this thing we call romantic love - there are devils untold and a world of heartache and depression, as possible side-effects --- why we dive back in for more --- never able to get beyond that all consuming addiction of our species --- deep...

Nicely spotted! It's the old imputed vs. imparted teaching. It's also due to the weird and wacky New Age type mix that exist in this hybrid branch of Christianity where the doctrine of Atonement is not accurately portrayed.