Recent content by george78

In the thread. I don't need anything else. You don't know of any practices that have already been imported to the U.S. from non-english-speaking nations? Did Adam and Eve pose for Michaelangeo?

The original article isn't original reporting, it is editorializing, claiming that those who are photographed nude don't suffer a loss of dignity. The claim is not false. Anyone who is photographed in inappropriate contentography suffers a loss of dignity, even if they *claim* otherwise. inappropriate contentography is...

You can't be serious. Because those under 18 are minors.

And I understand that you believe the material referenced in the OP is not child-inappropriate content, even though it demonstrably is. You don't think the scripture is clear? My beef is with the acceptance of evil in the world today as something that is harmless. You know as well as I do that people will...

Read the definition again. There is a common after the word nudity. Therefore, simply posing in varying states of nudity is inappropriate contentography. One of our framers was named Jasper Yeats. Years after the Constitutional Convention he sat on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court when an obscenity case came...

I am so sick and tired of people attacking lifesite. Lifesite didn't lie. It doesn't matter that teens *claim* a "self esteem boost" They still lose their dignity. inappropriate contentography is degrading. People who pose in inappropriate contentography often *claim* a "self esteem boost" yet research shows that in reality...

I don't shower with others, nor in public, nor with people taking pictures. Hey I am against inappropriate contentography thats over 18 as well. It's just that child inappropriate content is even more vile. Worked for me. God's way always works best. Nothing, they both are vile.

God's standards do. God Clothed Mankind after the fall. Lifesite doesn't distort a thing. Lifesite even quotes Germans on the issue. Lifesite points out accurately what is occuring. Just because Germans think that a nude 16 year old is not child inappropriate content doesn't make it not child inappropriate content. And...

[/SIZE][/COLOR][/FONT] A photograph of a nude 16 year old is child inappropriate contentography. It absolutely sickens me that people are condoning taking nude pictures of minors. :sick::sick::sick::sick::sick: The Germans can call it "art" all they want, or claim that "it's not about sex" all they want, but...

[/FONT]inappropriate contentography <application> Still or moving images, usually of women, in varying states of nudity, posing or performing erotic acts with men, women, animals, machines, or other props. Some say it degrades women, some say it corrupts young boys (who down-load it from the World-Wide Web or...

The State executing a rapist will do a lot for the woman and society as a whole. Killing an innocent child accomplishes nothing. If the woman doesn't want the child she can choose adoption.

No it suggests that the State should execute the rapist as a matter of justice. IOW Rape should be a capital crime.

[FONT=Palatino Linotype][SIZE=3] http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/tm_objectid=17525214&method=full&siteid=66633&headline=thou-shalt-slaughter--name_page.html http://kevin.davnet.org/essays/hitler.html

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=51677 A rabbi has launched a defense of D. James Kennedy, whose new television special this weekend will raise an alarm about the bloodshed credited to the influence of Darwin's theories of evolution, and has been attacked because of its...

http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2006/aug/06082509.html BUENOS AIRES, August 25, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Argentina, an overwhelmingly pro-life and Catholic country, is succeeding in loosening abortion restrictions through the so-called “rape exception,” despite constitutional protections for life...