• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

"Don't Give up the Ship"

BCP1928

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2024
9,714
4,929
83
Goldsboro NC
✟286,407.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Once upon a time blowing up a boat and then killing the survivors in the water would have been regarded as a monumental atrocity even when perpetrated against combatant enemies. Once upon a time Christians would lament the victims of such an enormity. Now all we care about is whether the action can be painted as legal or a plausiible low-ranking scapegoat can be found. That's what MAGA has done to us, and them.
 
Upvote 0

FAITH-IN-HIM

Well-Known Member
Aug 23, 2024
2,644
1,900
WI
✟73,157.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Once upon a time blowing up a boat and then killing the survivors in the water would have been regarded as a monumental atrocity even when perpetrated against combatant enemies. Once upon a time Christians would lament the victims of such an enormity. Now all we care about is whether the action can be painted as legal or a plausiible low-ranking scapegoat can be found. That's what MAGA has done to us, and them.

It is not exclusive to the MAGA movement. President Obama authorized a drone strike in Yemen that targeted an American citizen. At that time, liberals who called President Bush a "killer" did not object to President Obama's actions.
 
Upvote 0

Aryeh Jay

Stuck on a ship.
Site Supporter
Jul 19, 2012
17,945
16,700
MI - Michigan
✟712,437.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
a plausiible low-ranking scapegoat can be found. That's what MAGA has done to us, and them.

Thankfully the scapegoat chosen is quite a bit higher than me.
 
Upvote 0

RDKirk

Alien, Pilgrim, and Sojourner
Site Supporter
Mar 3, 2013
42,712
23,384
US
✟1,788,206.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
It is not exclusive to the MAGA movement. President Obama authorized a drone strike in Yemen that targeted an American citizen. At that time, liberals who called President Bush a "killer" did not object to President Obama's actions.
That was Anwar al-Awlaki, a New Mexico–born, radical Islamic cleric, whom the Barack Obama administration accused of being an operational leader of al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula. The killing of al-Awlaki was the result of a multiyear operation involving the CIA, Joint Special Operations Command, and allied foreign intelligence services. Obama did get some heat from that, enough in a later but very similar circumstance he got the help of Pakistan to capture Mohanad Mahmoud al-Farekh, an American citizen in Pakistan accused of being a major figure in al-Qaeda.

Or the difference between the two may have only been that capturing al-Farekh was feasible while capturing al-Awlaki was not.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: FAITH-IN-HIM
Upvote 0

BCP1928

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2024
9,714
4,929
83
Goldsboro NC
✟286,407.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
It is not exclusive to the MAGA movement. President Obama authorized a drone strike in Yemen that targeted an American citizen. At that time, liberals who called President Bush a "killer" did not object to President Obama's actions.
Did we not?
 
Upvote 0

BCP1928

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2024
9,714
4,929
83
Goldsboro NC
✟286,407.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
That was Anwar al-Awlaki, a New Mexico–born, radical Islamic cleric, whom the Barack Obama administration accused of being an operational leader of al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula. The killing of al-Awlaki was the result of a multiyear operation involving the CIA, Joint Special Operations Command, and allied foreign intelligence services. Obama did get some heat from that, enough in a later but very similar circumstance he got the help of Pakistan to capture Mohanad Mahmoud al-Farekh, an American citizen in Pakistan accused of being a major figure in al-Qaeda.

Or the difference between the two may have only been that capturing al-Farekh was feasible while capturing al-Awlaki was not.
Those were both known individuals with serious evidence against them, not anonymous alleged drug smugglers. Tell me, was al-
Farekh summarily gunned down when he was captured, or did he stand trial? You know the answer.
 
Upvote 0

RDKirk

Alien, Pilgrim, and Sojourner
Site Supporter
Mar 3, 2013
42,712
23,384
US
✟1,788,206.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Even the killing of Osama bin Laden seemed dubious to me, and he was a bona fide terrorist leader.

Those were both known individuals with serious evidence against them, not anonymous alleged drug smugglers. Tell me, was al-
Farekh summarily gunned down when he was captured, or did he stand trial? You know the answer.

From a soldier's viewpoint, if Obama or Trump are doing wrong, it's for Congress to call them on it.

The soldier is responsible for what's in front of him: A bad guy caught doing bad guy things right in front of him is a valid target. Whether or not Congress wanted him there at that time to catch that bad guy doing bad things and targeting him is not something he's held accountable for.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

MarcusGregor

New year, new you...
Oct 1, 2025
21
37
25
South
✟1,732.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
  • Informative
Reactions: Hans Blaster
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

I march with Sherman
Mar 11, 2017
23,306
17,305
55
USA
✟438,689.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Upvote 0

BPPLEE

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
16,806
7,853
62
Montgomery
✟278,128.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
There is the underbussing we've been expecting.
Maybe it was a mistake. If so, it’s all good, like when Biden did it
  • Victims: The strike killed Zemari Ahmadi, an Afghan aid worker for the U.S.-based organization Nutrition & Education International (NEI), and nine members of his family, including seven children. The youngest victim was a two-year-old girl named Sumaya.
  • The Mistake: U.S. intelligence tracked Ahmadi's white Toyota Corolla for eight hours, mistakenly believing it was an ISIS-K vehicle laden with explosives and a direct threat to U.S. forces at the Kabul airport, days after a deadly suicide bombing there.
 
Upvote 0

hedrick

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Feb 8, 2009
20,550
10,920
New Jersey
✟1,373,731.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Single
There is the underbussing we've been expecting.
It may even be true. My bet: the Secretary of Defense didn't actually say "if anyone survives, kill them." But when someone survived, someone had to interpret what ambiguous orders actually meant. It's not liikely that they'll be court-martialed, but I predict further promotions will be hard to get.

They really should have followed the Democrats' advice. Not "I refuse to follow this order," but "I don't think that's what the Secretary really meant."
 
Upvote 0

BCP1928

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2024
9,714
4,929
83
Goldsboro NC
✟286,407.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
It may even be true. My bet: the Secretary of Defense didn't actually say "if anyone survives, kill them." But when someone survived, someone had to interpret what ambiguous orders actually meant. It's not liikely that they'll be court-martialed, but I predict further promotions will be hard to get.

They really should have followed the Democrats' advice. Not "I refuse to follow this order," but "I don't think that's what the Secretary really meant."
"Who will rid me of this troublesome priest?" --Henry II
 
Upvote 0

RDKirk

Alien, Pilgrim, and Sojourner
Site Supporter
Mar 3, 2013
42,712
23,384
US
✟1,788,206.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
It may even be true. My bet: the Secretary of Defense didn't actually say "if anyone survives, kill them."
But when someone survived, someone had to interpret what ambiguous orders actually meant.
I said that earlier myself.
It's not likely that they'll be court-martialed, but I predict further promotions will be hard to get.
Maybe they'll find a way to let him weasel out. It depends on how bipartisan the Congressional complaints get. All it does is feed fuel to the fire of troops being sure not to obey illegal orders, particularly if the lower ranking people catch heat.
They really should have followed the Democrats' advice. Not "I refuse to follow this order," but "I don't think that's what the Secretary really meant."
He wouldn't have had to say anything, simply not do it. The survivors of the later boat were rescued alive.
 
Upvote 0