Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
So, Bradley has been thrown off the sleigh to the wolves.
Yes, he didn't need a weatherman to know which way the wind was blowing.
That's for sure. “Curses are like young chickens, they always come home to roost”'Yes, he didn't need a weatherman to know which way the wind was blowing.
Once upon a time blowing up a boat and then killing the survivors in the water would have been regarded as a monumental atrocity even when perpetrated against combatant enemies. Once upon a time Christians would lament the victims of such an enormity. Now all we care about is whether the action can be painted as legal or a plausiible low-ranking scapegoat can be found. That's what MAGA has done to us, and them.
a plausiible low-ranking scapegoat can be found. That's what MAGA has done to us, and them.
That was Anwar al-Awlaki, a New Mexico–born, radical Islamic cleric, whom the Barack Obama administration accused of being an operational leader of al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula. The killing of al-Awlaki was the result of a multiyear operation involving the CIA, Joint Special Operations Command, and allied foreign intelligence services. Obama did get some heat from that, enough in a later but very similar circumstance he got the help of Pakistan to capture Mohanad Mahmoud al-Farekh, an American citizen in Pakistan accused of being a major figure in al-Qaeda.It is not exclusive to the MAGA movement. President Obama authorized a drone strike in Yemen that targeted an American citizen. At that time, liberals who called President Bush a "killer" did not object to President Obama's actions.
Did we not?It is not exclusive to the MAGA movement. President Obama authorized a drone strike in Yemen that targeted an American citizen. At that time, liberals who called President Bush a "killer" did not object to President Obama's actions.
Those were both known individuals with serious evidence against them, not anonymous alleged drug smugglers. Tell me, was al-That was Anwar al-Awlaki, a New Mexico–born, radical Islamic cleric, whom the Barack Obama administration accused of being an operational leader of al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula. The killing of al-Awlaki was the result of a multiyear operation involving the CIA, Joint Special Operations Command, and allied foreign intelligence services. Obama did get some heat from that, enough in a later but very similar circumstance he got the help of Pakistan to capture Mohanad Mahmoud al-Farekh, an American citizen in Pakistan accused of being a major figure in al-Qaeda.
Or the difference between the two may have only been that capturing al-Farekh was feasible while capturing al-Awlaki was not.
Even the killing of Osama bin Laden seemed dubious to me, and he was a bona fide terrorist leader.
Those were both known individuals with serious evidence against them, not anonymous alleged drug smugglers. Tell me, was al-
Farekh summarily gunned down when he was captured, or did he stand trial? You know the answer.
![]()
White House says admiral ordered follow-up strike on alleged drug boat, insists attack was lawful
The White House says a Navy admiral ordered a second strike on an alleged drug boat in the Caribbean Sea and insists the September attack that has come under bipartisan scrutiny was lawful.apnews.com
Maybe it was a mistake. If so, it’s all good, like when Biden did itThere is the underbussing we've been expecting.
Maybe it was a mistake.
It may even be true. My bet: the Secretary of Defense didn't actually say "if anyone survives, kill them." But when someone survived, someone had to interpret what ambiguous orders actually meant. It's not liikely that they'll be court-martialed, but I predict further promotions will be hard to get.There is the underbussing we've been expecting.
"Who will rid me of this troublesome priest?" --Henry IIIt may even be true. My bet: the Secretary of Defense didn't actually say "if anyone survives, kill them." But when someone survived, someone had to interpret what ambiguous orders actually meant. It's not liikely that they'll be court-martialed, but I predict further promotions will be hard to get.
They really should have followed the Democrats' advice. Not "I refuse to follow this order," but "I don't think that's what the Secretary really meant."
I said that earlier myself.It may even be true. My bet: the Secretary of Defense didn't actually say "if anyone survives, kill them."
But when someone survived, someone had to interpret what ambiguous orders actually meant.
Maybe they'll find a way to let him weasel out. It depends on how bipartisan the Congressional complaints get. All it does is feed fuel to the fire of troops being sure not to obey illegal orders, particularly if the lower ranking people catch heat.It's not likely that they'll be court-martialed, but I predict further promotions will be hard to get.
He wouldn't have had to say anything, simply not do it. The survivors of the later boat were rescued alive.They really should have followed the Democrats' advice. Not "I refuse to follow this order," but "I don't think that's what the Secretary really meant."