B flat B♭

[Apple Sky]

Everyone does but I’m not sure where you are going with this. Please explain.

That we have a localized sun which circuits the skies/firmament.

 

[Apple Sky]

Plenty of proof. Heliocentrism is fully proven.

By whom, Copernicus ? His version was only theories which they decided to make official.

 

[Hentenza]

That we have a localized sun which circuits the skies/firmament.

We don’t. The earth revolves around the sun. That is fully proven.

 

[Hentenza]

By whom, Copernicus ? His version was only theories which they decided to make official.

View attachment 372720

Copernicus believed and had a heliocentric theory. From AI:

“Polish astronomer Nicolaus Copernicus (1473-1543) proposed the heliocentric model, which placed the sun at the center of the solar system, with the Earth and other planets orbiting it. Copernicus's model was controversial at the time, but it marked the beginning of the Scientific Revolution and a shift in how people viewed the world. “

 

[Apple Sky]

We don’t. The earth revolves around the sun. That is fully proven.

Well how come God/Joshua stopped the sun & the moon ?

 

[Apple Sky]

Copernicus believed and had a heliocentric theory. From AI:

“Polish astronomer Nicolaus Copernicus (1473-1543) proposed the heliocentric model, which placed the sun at the center of the solar system, with the Earth and other planets orbiting it. Copernicus's model was controversial at the time, but it marked the beginning of the Scientific Revolution and a shift in how people viewed the world. “

It marked the beginning of the biggest lie ever told.

 

[Hentenza]

Well how come God/Joshua stopped the sun & the moon ?

Provide a verse please.

 

[Apple Sky]

Provide a verse please.

On the day that the LORD gave the Amorites over to the Israelites, Joshua spoke to the LORD in the presence of Israel: “O sun, stand still over Gibeon, O moon, over the Valley of Aijalon.” 13So the sun stood still and the moon stopped until the nation took vengeance upon its enemies. Is this not written in the Book of Jashar? “So the sun stopped in the middle of the sky and delayed going down about a full day.” 14There has been no day like it before or since, when the LORD listened to the voice of a man, because the LORD fought for Israel. Joshua 10:12

 

[prodromos]

Well they must have knew about sun & how it shines down.

View attachment 372719

And so from your misunderstanding of what you are looking at here, the sun is barely a mile away? Is that what you think this proves?

 

[Apple Sky]

And so from your misunderstanding of what you are looking at here, the sun is barely a mile away? Is that what you think this proves?

Don't be silly

 

[Hentenza]

I agree, but they did teach an unmovable stationery earth plus a firmament with the sun, moon and stars set in it.

They did not. It’s symbolic and poetic language.

 

[prodromos]

The Earth stands still while our stars do this:

The don't on the equator, and once you cross the equator they rotate in the opposite direction.

And this simple, verifiable reality can never be explained by the flat earth model.

And our "planets," once known as our wandering stars do this:


This is what we have observed throughout at least the time that men have looked to the sky.

Hardly, seeing as Neptune and Uranus weren't discovered until the 1800's

And this simple, verifiable reality can never be explained by heliocentrism.

It is absolutely explained by heliocentrism. Anyone who claims otherwise is either wilfully ignorant or lying through their teeth.

Planetary Motion

 

[prodromos]

Don't be silly

Then don't post nonsense. This is what you claim regarding crepuscular rays, that the sun is local, but it simply demonstrates that you do not properly understand perspective and how it affects the appearance of parallel rays.

 

[Apple Sky]

Then don't post nonsense. This is what you claim regarding crepuscular rays, that the sun is local, but it simply demonstrates that you do not properly understand perspective and how it affects the appearance of parallel rays.

If the sun was 93,000,000 miles away at that kind of distance the light rays would be parallel, as Dave Murphy points out in this short clip.

Geometry tells us that if the light source were far way at the dizzying distance that NASA claims, the light rays coming through relatively close-together holes in the cloud cover such as these would be near parallel , not fanning out at divergent angles like we see.

Corpuscular rays like the image shows, proves the NASA narrative is false and the Sun is not millions of miles away.

 

[David Lamb]

If the sun was 93 miles away at that kind of distance the light rays would be parallel, as Dave Murphy points out in this short clip.

Whoever said that the sun was 93 miles away from the earth?

 

[Apple Sky]

The don't on the equator, and once you cross the equator they rotate in the opposite direction.

They only appear too, it depends where you are located on the earth.

 

[Apple Sky]

Whoever said that the sun was 93 miles away from the earth?

Sorry - I mean't 93, 000,000 miles away.

 

[prodromos]

If the sun was 93,000,000 miles away at that kind of distance the light rays would be parallel, as Dave Murphy points out in this short clip.

They are effectively parallel. Perspective is what makes them appear to diverge.

 

[prodromos]

They only appear too, it depends where you are located on the earth.

LOL! Then they only 'appear' to rotate about polaris in the Northern Hemisphere.

 

[Apple Sky]

They are effectively parallel. Perspective is what makes them appear to diverge.

Do you not understand just how far 93,000,000 miles is ? The mind boggles.
How do they get to these fictitious distances ?