As I earlier said:
"Very importantly it should be pointed out that a presidential election shouldn't be about "winning" the election - it should be about the direction in policy we as a country are wanting to go..."
When it's all about winning there's no discussion as to where they are planning on taking you after they get into power leaving the door wide open to take us as a nation in unimaginably horrible places.
There is an obfuscation of the truth in every demonization of Trump, and an obfuscation of where they are really promising to take the nation.
Therefore, Kamala's very real flip flops and lies about policies and positions are all the more important for the American people to know.
I don't disagree.
However, the reality here is, if Harris doesn't win, that means Trump will. (Sure, there's a remote chance than a third party candidate will win...but it's highly unlikely) So when considering who to vote for, it's entirely germane to compare the two. If you want to compare policies, fine. Go right ahead. Compare Harris' specific plans to implement any policies or positions she says she's for with the specific plans to implement the policies and positions Trump stands for. (And if you want to throw in a third party candidate or two, feel free. Might be fun.) Post your observations about this, and we'll see what conversations arise from it. But, when you do, please offer both sides, so we can compare and contrast, see who gets more specific, and whether or not we can use that specific information to make an informed decision when it comes time to vote.
If all you want to do is criticize one candidate's policies or positions, then you're
de facto advocating for that candidate's opponent. Let's not pretend otherwise. So don't be surprised when that opponent's name comes up. And when that happens, don't be surprised if past actions by that person enter the discussion. Such as any attempts they may have made to subvert the electoral process by, say, appointing fake electors, or calling a state official to "find" enough votes to turn the state's election results. Or any insurrection attempts they may or may have incited. Just sayin'.
Now, I've seen more than a few presidential elections in my day. I can tell you, from experience, that few politicians, especially candidates for president, get overly specific about policy. Most offer vague and generalized promises, most of which won't come to pass. And we all know this. Nothing new under the sun there.
What strikes me as weird is how the MAGA right is now acting as if Kamala Harris is the first politician ever to do this. Especially considering Trump's been doing it all along.
And have you seen Trump's agenda? If you can find any specific plans in there, I'd be shocked.
-- A2SG, the only specific plans that I've seen are coming from the Heritage Foundation in Project 2025, and Trump claims to not know a thing about that....
