durangodawood
Dis Member
- Aug 28, 2007
- 23,403
- 15,550
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Seeker
- Marital Status
- Single
Upvote
0
. What does Joe have to do with this?Do you think Joe would really care whether documents were locked up at the Trump residence gathering dust or locked in some government storage room?
Do you think Joe would really care whether documents were locked up at the Trump residence gathering dust or locked in some government storage room? That doesn't bring in any cash for anyone. What more and more of the American people are doing is watching what they do rather than what they say. That is the key. They say the border is secure, look at the videos for yourself. They say they don't teach CRT in the classrooms, look at the material for yourself. It is not a secret that they are trying to come up with something so that the will of the American people is negated in the next presidential election.
The documents were declassified, Hillary's case was the opposite--she was caught with TOP SECRET information. SCI merely means it is compartmentalized information. They need to return what they seized from President Trump and his family.What does "Joe" have to do with this?
As for the government, yes, I think they have a vested interest in whether classified information is in a basement, even if locked, of a building accessible by the general public where no one has a valid reason to be viewing those Top Secret/SCI documents. I think the government would definitely work to ensure any such documents were properly stored, according to what the law requires, in a SCIF.
The documents were declassified, Hillary's case was the opposite--she was caught with TOP SECRET information. SCI merely means it is compartmentalized information.
The nuclear secrets story is another anonymous claim, how many hoaxes against Trump do the American people have to put up with?No, it was not declassified. In fact, it is alleged that Pres. Trump could not declassify the documents (the President cannot declassify nuclear secrets, as it is classified by Congress).
In your considered opinion: what was President Trump’s biggest blunder?The nuclear secrets story is another anonymous claim, how many hoaxes against Trump do the American people have to put up with?
The documents were declassified, Hillary's case was the opposite--she was caught with TOP SECRET information. SCI merely means it is compartmentalized information. They need to return what they seized from President Trump and his family.
His actions after the election. If he had conceded gracefully he would have remained a strong candidate for 2024. But this latest fiasco has put the wind back in his sails.In your considered opinion: what was President Trump’s biggest blunder?
The documents were declassified, Hillary's case was the opposite--she was caught with TOP SECRET information. SCI merely means it is compartmentalized information. They need to return what they seized from President Trump and his family.
I'm going to have to go with RDKirk because of his work experience.Sensitive Compartmented Information is compartmentation of classified information. Compartmentation means that merely having a particular level of clearance doesn't provide access to that particular information. For example, in an office where everyone has a SECRET clearance, the SECRET SCI information will be in a separate safe that only a few of those people have access to. The classification level of SECRET defines the physical security necessary (how long it must take to crack the safe and how often a guard must take a peek at it).
There's no such thing as SCI unclassified information. I have seen TOP SECRET and SECRET information that has been compartmented. I've never seen CONFIDENTIAL information compartmented...but my experience was almost always with TOP SECRET and SECRET.
If it is SCI, it is classified.
Correct. It is compartmentalized classified information, that is the subject we've been discussing, classification and declassification. It is not a classification by itself, it means it is compartmentalized. It doesn't mean it is more important, although it very well could be.Sensitive Compartmented Information is compartmentation of classified information. Compartmentation means that merely having a particular level of clearance doesn't provide access to that particular information. For example, in an office where everyone has a SECRET clearance, the SECRET SCI information will be in a separate safe that only a few of those people have access to. The classification level of SECRET defines the physical security necessary (how long it must take to crack the safe and how often a guard must take a peek at it).
There's no such thing as SCI unclassified information. I have seen TOP SECRET and SECRET information that has been compartmented. I've never seen CONFIDENTIAL information compartmented...but my experience was almost always with TOP SECRET and SECRET.
If it is SCI, it is classified.
The documents did not belong to Trump or his family. He and his lawyers asserted that they had already returned all the documents he pilfered, but that was obviously not true, ie. another Trump lie.The documents were declassified, Hillary's case was the opposite--she was caught with TOP SECRET information. SCI merely means it is compartmentalized information. They need to return what they seized from President Trump and his family.
False. Trump lawyers never said they pilfered anything. The search violated the 4th amendment of the Constitution. The Justice Department needs to return personal property, they should return his passports today.The documents did not belong to Trump or his family. He and his lawyers asserted that they had already returned all the documents he pilfered, but that was obviously not true, ie. another Trump lie.
There was a search warrent. The 4th amendment was not violated.False. Trump lawyers never said they pilfered anything. The search violated the 4th amendment of the Constitution. The Justice Department needs to return personal property, they should return his passports today.
There were no nuclear secrets, that's a hoax. The search warrant violated the Constitution.There was a search warrent. The 4th amendment was not violated.
The documents where highly classified, the search warrent was warrented.
Even if Trump said they where declassified, Congress said the nucular secrets where classified.
Any more wood you want to throw on this bondfire?
An American take on “I am the state”, Trump is the constitution.How does a search warrant issued by a judge violate the Constitution?
Based on the list of items that where removed, I would disagree.There were no nuclear secrets, that's a hoax. The search warrant violated the Constitution.