probinson
Legend
- Aug 16, 2005
- 22,325
- 2,955
- 46
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Word of Faith
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
I still don't see any reason why you're continuing with this approach after being shown how actual researchers evaluate how vaccines work in the wild (hint - by comparing the relative infection rates between the vaccinated and unvaccinated population).
Right. Your vaccine will prevent you from getting infected from July-August 2021 (i.e the time-period studied). But surprise! You get infected in September 2021 instead. It might make the narrative that vaccines "prevent" infections sound good, but to the people who actually get infected after the study period, I don't think they care.
Are we really supposed to think that a random amateur on the internet has somehow figured out that people who do this for a living are all wrong?
"People who do this for a living" have been astonishingly wrong all throughout the pandemic.
Do you agree that "everyone" (or nearly everyone) is going to get COVID? If so, then the vaccines will fail at a rate of 100% to prevent infections. Or if you prefer, complete failure.That doesn't mean that vaccines "completely failed to slow the spread of COVID".
Last edited:
Upvote
0