So, basically the law of non-contradiction by a skilled exegete (who probably holds to your own general theology) putting together Biblical passages into a "catena aurea" of meaning is the standard?
No offense intended, but this seems rather weak and a recipe for multiple divergent interpretations. I mean, how does one even distinguish essentials & adiaphora, what books are canonical, can new inspired books be written, etc.? For the record, the Early Christians themselves, it seems, did not favor such an approach (and this despite their own love and devotion to Scripture). As Irenaeus of Lugdunum, himself a disciple of Polycarp who knew John the Apostles, put it around 189 A.D.:
"As I said before, the Church, having received this preaching and this faith, although she is disseminated throughout the whole world, yet guarded it, as if she occupied but one house. She likewise believes these things just as if she had but one soul and one and the same heart; and harmoniously she proclaims them and teaches them and hands them down, as if she possessed but one mouth. For, while the languages of the world are diverse, nevertheless, the authority of the tradition is one and the same... (
Adversus H. 1:10:2)."
He goes further: "What if the apostles had not in fact left writings to us? Would it not be necessary to follow the order of tradition, which was handed down to those to whom they entrusted the churches?" (ibid., 3:4:1).
My Great Teacher, Origen Adamantius ("Man of Steel") put it likewise in 225 A.D. at the very beginning of his
Peri Archon 1:2,
"Although there are many who believe that they themselves hold to the teachings of Christ, there are yet some among them who think differently from their predecessors. The teaching of the Church has indeed been handed down through an order of succession from the apostles and remains in the churches even to the present time. That alone is to be believed as the truth which is in no way at variance with ecclesiastical and apostolic tradition."
Moreover, Origen was no slouch in Scripture nor Biblical hermeneutics, as his Hexapla demonstrates aptly.
Regardless, I find the position you advocate fascinating.