I don't think anyone ever claimed that it would.
I couldn’t care less either way. If I did get banned, I certainly wouldn’t whine about it, because I’m not a baby…
I think you need to slow down and go back and read what he was responding to.you think the difference between a tomboy and a woman claiming to be a man is just identifying as a man? you can just claim you are man and everyone needs to like it just like that? and if someone says you are not a man then you are a hateful bigot?.
I'm not quite sure who "you" is in your post.you think the difference between a tomboy and a woman claiming to be a man is just identifying as a man? you can just claim you are man and everyone needs to like it just like that? and if someone says you are not a man then you are a hateful bigot?.
There comes a point when you can no longer go along to get along. You have to take a stance.
He can set up his own website. Or he can go shout at people in the street by the bins near Tesco. He can say anything he likes.You would be protesting too if what you thought were perfectly legitimate remarks but you got kick out of the all the news, social etc media platforms that are out there. Liberalism/Progressivism has its own media platform in the movies, music, social media, news media, etc (you have a free "mic to the world" to voice your opinions without consequences). But your view of yourself is sooooooooo unrealistic. Yes, many fed, state and local governments are led by conservative minded people but liberals/progressives control what and how news/events/subjects/morality are portray to the world. So you might think your group is "David" against the conservative thinking government "Goliaths" but in reality, you are the "Goliaths" and the people without a media voice are the conservative "Davids".
Because liberal/progressive media WON'T ALLOW a conservative voice to be heard on any media platform, you will always be "Goliath" and more and more conservatives will be brought into government because American's love an underdog. If conservative ideas are that terrible give them a voice on social, news etc media. People will see if they are lousy views or not and if they are they will reject them.
Conservative minded people are working on conservative social, news etc media platforms (and in FOX News they have succeeded). They will eventually control the way news/events/subjects/morality are talked about and viewed then and only then will liberal/progressive people be a minority and be seen as "David".
Thing is that conservatives USED to control it all. There is no reason to think that they will regain control.Conservative minded people are working on conservative social, news etc media platforms (and in FOX News they have succeeded). They will eventually control the way news/events/subjects/morality are talked about and viewed then and only then will liberal/progressive people be a minority and be seen as "David".
I agree, and think most people would. But some examples, like JP, will evoke visceral responses that some just can't get past. It's what he's known for as one of the earlier opponents of PC.
You would be protesting too if what you thought were perfectly legitimate remarks but you got kick out of the all the news, social etc media platforms that are out there. Liberalism/Progressivism has its own media platform in the movies, music, social media, news media, etc (you have a free "mic to the world" to voice your opinions without consequences). But your view of yourself is sooooooooo unrealistic. Yes, many fed, state and local governments are led by conservative minded people but liberals/progressives control what and how news/events/subjects/morality are portray to the world. So you might think your group is "David" against the conservative thinking government "Goliaths" but in reality, you are the "Goliaths" and the people without a media voice are the conservative "Davids".
Because liberal/progressive media WON'T ALLOW a conservative voice to be heard on any media platform, you will always be "Goliath" and more and more conservatives will be brought into government because American's love an underdog. If conservative ideas are that terrible give them a voice on social, news etc media. People will see if they are lousy views or not and if they are they will reject them.
Conservative minded people are working on conservative social, news etc media platforms (and in FOX News they have succeeded). They will eventually control the way news/events/subjects/morality are talked about and viewed then and only then will liberal/progressive people be a minority and be seen as "David".
He can set up his own website. Or he can go shout at people in the street by the bins near Tesco. He can say anything he likes.
He says a lot of things I agree with and isn't afraid to do so and I value that. I don't care about right or left.
While he is one who at the end of the day cannot help but speak his mind, I wish he had a more stoic attitude when he faces blowback about it.
I do not think he is as smart as he believes himself to be, or his massive followers tell him.
He was right about that too. He pointed out that it's literally an athletic magazine showing a woman's unhealthy body.Peterson has said he’s quitting Twitter several times now, most recently when he got roasted for fat shaming a Sports Illustrated cover model and had to take a break. Twitter’s just helping him along with that.
I say good riddance.
You need a lot of indifference to weather it and that has its challenges. When you're that oblivious to what people think and feel (where you're concerned) it can be viewed as a lack of empathy, harshness, or condescension depending on the person. It has to be tempered.
It doesn't take deep intellect to address the things he does. You don't need to be bookish to speak the truth. You need to be wise and able to convey it in a manner people understand no matter their intelligence. That's usually KISS in all honesty.
I can see why many conservatives would rather look at the steel hard abs and chiseled physique of a male model, but give some respect to people who like rubenesque women.He was right about that too. He pointed out that it's literally an athletic magazine showing a woman's unhealthy body.
He's really just an embarrassment. I don't know how he's garnered such a large following
There are others who do better like Gad Saad or Karen Straughan. I'll admit, the anti-woke crowd often loses a lot more arguments than it really should.
It would be much better if they were the face of anti-woke than Jordan Peterson.
By lying about bill C16 at the height of the anti-"SJW" trend a few years ago, and parlaying it into a career as a pop philosopher/self-help guru.
He's Deepak Chopra for bros and MRAs. The quintessential stupid person's idea of a smart person.
Ehhh...personally, I would cite John McWhorter as a better example than either of those. I recommend Woke Racism to anyone reading along. Does a very good job of granting that a lot of people who buy into "wokism" are well-intentioned, but explains why it's detrimental to real progress.