- Mar 2, 2013
- 7,056
- 3,767
- Country
- New Zealand
- Faith
- Eastern Orthodox
- Marital Status
- Single
I've been thinking about the "friend Enemy distinction," as something which relates not only to politics but human interaction on the whole. I believe it applies to even the religious life and would like some input.
Many Christians seem to believe or at least presume without thinking, that they operate in a world where they are enemies of no one and no one is their enemy on a scale that matters. It's an application of Jesus' words to love thy enemy. Yet Jesus himself doesn't say 'Don't have enemies,' rather 'love thy enemy.' Implicit in the statement is the understanding that Christians will have enemies but they are to treat them with love.
Historically, before liberalism and the enlightenment I would say it was fairly obvious for Christians to think in an 'us vs them' mentality. To recognize friend from enemy. You could think of the wars between Muslims and Christians. Christians understood the Muslims to be their enemy who must be repelled. They did not surrender to Muslims out of a loving concern for them. The most faithful Christians did not willingly assimilate Islamic society and understood themselves to be different, instituting where they could control over their communities to distinguish themselves from Muslims. That's just one example. It's all over the history of Christianity, which is something we can discuss if anyone questions that.
In modernity I think many Christians have abandoned this outlook in favour of a more liberal outlook. So the question is, for any Christian, regardless of what side of the theological spectrum you fall into, do Christians have enemies and is it better to be conscious of one's enemies? If so, who do you consider an enemy? Or if you believe Christians don't have enemies why do you believe that to be the case?
I will note, that the friend enemy distinction doesn't necessarily involve hatred or emotional responses to certain peoples or groups. It's simply a recognition of who is one's friend or who is one's enemy. It asserts there isn't a state of neutrality between peoples.
Many Christians seem to believe or at least presume without thinking, that they operate in a world where they are enemies of no one and no one is their enemy on a scale that matters. It's an application of Jesus' words to love thy enemy. Yet Jesus himself doesn't say 'Don't have enemies,' rather 'love thy enemy.' Implicit in the statement is the understanding that Christians will have enemies but they are to treat them with love.
Historically, before liberalism and the enlightenment I would say it was fairly obvious for Christians to think in an 'us vs them' mentality. To recognize friend from enemy. You could think of the wars between Muslims and Christians. Christians understood the Muslims to be their enemy who must be repelled. They did not surrender to Muslims out of a loving concern for them. The most faithful Christians did not willingly assimilate Islamic society and understood themselves to be different, instituting where they could control over their communities to distinguish themselves from Muslims. That's just one example. It's all over the history of Christianity, which is something we can discuss if anyone questions that.
In modernity I think many Christians have abandoned this outlook in favour of a more liberal outlook. So the question is, for any Christian, regardless of what side of the theological spectrum you fall into, do Christians have enemies and is it better to be conscious of one's enemies? If so, who do you consider an enemy? Or if you believe Christians don't have enemies why do you believe that to be the case?
I will note, that the friend enemy distinction doesn't necessarily involve hatred or emotional responses to certain peoples or groups. It's simply a recognition of who is one's friend or who is one's enemy. It asserts there isn't a state of neutrality between peoples.
Last edited: