None at all? Are you sure? Because I can think of many examples, including Biblical ones.
You mean like these?
(stating that the entire msm has inadequacies)
(grouping together all of BLM/ANTIFA groups into one massive supergroup and blaming them for "one billioin in property damage")
(lumping together "the people who made that graphic" and all of the NYT and CNN as having bias and therefore losing credibility)
(lumping together your friends and identifying expected behavior of the group when they drink liquor)
Well, talk about losing credibility.......
I don't believe you at all. Apparently it's not "typical" at all and you can't even come up with just a few examples so you are giving an excuse.
Or perhaps you are trying not to dig a deeper hole in your claim that behavior is "typical" among a certain group of people and you know that by identifying such a group of people you would be directly exposing your hypocrisy in bemoaning how others paint a group of people with a broad brush stroke? "Typical" is a description of something that is regularly occurring - the question is, with or by who? Is it a certain group? Can you identify examples? Oh yeah, "something something don't want to cite examples, something....." ....Riiiiiiight....
So you made a claim about certain behavior being "typical" about groups of people and you realize now that if you cite examples then you are demonstrating that you actually do make statements that discriminate against groups of people. Got it!!! (We all can see it!!!)
Limited to Christ? OK. Tell me, what compassion is greater than Christ Himself? Please explain.
Well then either you lack discernment or you are choosing not to discern because you don't want to be critical of someone who espouses your own political agenda.
Oh, I do know that, I can discern. The Word of God doesn't tell us to just accept everything everyone does but to evaluate and make judgments.
John 7:24 Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment.
Funny but earlier you had no problem judging the "bias" of all the people in the msm/NYT/CNN, and no problem judging BLM/ANTIFA, and no problem judging the woman in the OP as having made a mistake... Hmmm....
First, when Christ said that, He was referring to judgment in the sense of meting out justice, not in the sense of judging righteous judgment whereby you evaluate something to understand it according to Scripture. Let me know if you need further explanation about that.
But even so, you have no problem judging me as you are doing throughout this very post. Not to mention your judgment of msm/NYT/CNN and BLM and ANTIFA....
So now you're lumping together all "the people who have read a few of [my] posts" and speaking for them?
What pattern have all of them seen? Should be an easy answer for you since you're the one bringing it up. Can you back up your assertion??? Or were you just lumping people together and speaking for them based on the behavior and views you believe they should have???
That's quite a judgment of me. Why do you address my opinion on compassion if you're "not at all concerned about" it??? I think we all know why.
Who are you to judge her and determine that she made a mistake, let alone many??? How do you make that judgment after excoriating me for "judging"??? You seem certain she "made a mistake" - what is the basis of that judgment you are definitively making?
So you do use judgment? Earlier you told me you don't use judgment because you thought that Christ said not to judge. Of course, right after that you judged the woman as having made a mistake. Which is it? Which story do you want to proceed with? Can you make up your mind between your two contradicting stories??? Do you judge or not judge?
And yet you somehow know to judge them as "a mistake" or "possibly many mistakes". If you were able to judge them as such then how do you not know what they are rooted in? If her actions are not rooted in anything wrong then how are they wrong? Are you saying a good tree can somehow produce bad fruit?
So you are going to assume that her motivations were such that they were not evil or sinful motivations and that her mistakes were innocent mistakes that anyone could have made. So you judged her motivations; you judged them favorably but you made your judgment. And you here admit that you judge her as having done wrong and you try to sugar-coat it as "mistakes".
BLM/ANTIFA grouped themselves together since they participated in the same riots which is what was being addressed.
There is no question that news organizations have a bias as do fact check organizations. What is your point? The fact that the NYT and CNN have lost credibility is a fact than can be verified.
I know my friends far better than you do. Again what is your point?
I am not going to give you examples of bigoted speech. That would be a violation of CF rules.
Providing you with specific examples of posts that contain statements that discriminate against specifics groups would also be a violation of the rules of this forum.
I would not even begin to compare my compassion to the compassion of Jesus that would be extremely prideful nor am I going to judge if anyone else has shown compassion comparable to that of Christ.
You are free to make the judgment that I lack discernment because I will not condemn someone to the degree that you have said that you feel is appropriate. Frankly I am not concerned with convicting and condemning people for their mistakes I will leave that up to satan, it his job but he is willing to accept all the help anyone wants to give him.
Recognizing that someone made a mistake is far from judging that person.
It is important to understand Scripture, especially if an attempt is being made to use it as a hammer, a practice that I do not endorse.
Breaking Down the Key Parts of John 7:24
#1 “Stop judging…”
Christians have always debated the definition of judging. It is true that we are not supposed to judge others, lest we be judged (Mt 7:1). That kind of judgment or judgmentalism is a way to play God, making yourself an idol and hating others for what you are judging in them.
#2 “…by mere appearances,”
Judging by appearance only is one form of judgmentalism. It is the sin of making assumptions about the whole from what the outside looks like, especially in the case of the Jews who rejected Christ and were being dishonest in their judgment. Not so deep down they understood what it would cost them if Jesus was the Messiah, and they lied to themselves by focusing on external things and the letter of the law as they had interpreted it.
John 7:24 Meaning of Stop Judging by Mere Appearances
My understand of Christian Forum posting rules is that they are designed to discourage or eliminate posts that display or suggest, anger, judgment of others, attribution of the worst possible motives, condemnation, personal attacks, very little if any compassion for others, and the propensity to argue even minor points simply for the sake of arguing or in an attempt to bully someone.
Regarding your question as to how I can presume to call her actions a mistake without knowing what her motivation is, the answer to that is simple, she violated the law, that was a mistake, it makes no difference why she violated the law. Motivation is not an issue and at best it is subjective. if anyone can determine why people do what they do, they have a great talent that is worth millions.