Same issue with the more frequent occurrence of the problem from covid.Only we don't know yet if it causes permanent damage.
Upvote
0
Same issue with the more frequent occurrence of the problem from covid.Only we don't know yet if it causes permanent damage.
There's no substance altering anybody's DNA in any Covid vaccines.So, flip a coin. I'd rather rely on my immune system than put a substance in my body that alters my DNA.
There's no substance altering anybody's DNA in any Covid vaccines.
That's rich. No, it doesn't say it on "the packaging", LOL. Now go do some research.oh really ... you obviously have not read the packaging ...
example on the AstraZeneca package its has (ChAd0x1-S [recombinant])
now go do some research ...
That's rich. No, it doesn't say it on "the packaging", LOL. Now go do some research.
I'd rather rely on my immune system than put a substance in my body that alters my DNA.
So my immune system will work against the vaccine but not against the virus? Lol. Double speak at it's best!Except the vaccines don't alter your DNA (the mRNA vaccines specifically lack the enzymes for reverse transcription), whereas the SARS-CoV-2 virus can: Reverse-transcribed SARS-CoV-2 RNA can integrate into the genome of cultured human cells and can be expressed in patient-derived tissues
Plus, even on the highly unlikely chance that reverse transcription occurred with the vaccine, given the injection site and short-lived nature of the mRNA strands, at best it would integrate into somatic cells at the injection site (e.g. shoulder muscle). Which in turn are likely to be replaced anyway through normal cellular regeneration.
Whereas the virus can spread throughout your entire body and therefore more likely to integrate with somatic cells (e.g. eggs, sperm) and therefore become part of the DNA that would potentially be passed onto offspring and thus become part of the gene pool.
So if you're worried about altering your DNA, you're far more at risk of that from the virus than the vaccine.
at best it would integrate into somatic cells at the injection site (e.g. shoulder muscle).
So my immune system will work against the vaccine but not against the virus? Lol. Double speak at it's best!
"Specifically, a new study by MIT and Harvard scientists demonstrates that segments of the RNA from the coronavirus itself are most likely becoming a permanent fixture in human DNA. (study linked below). This was once thought near impossible, for the same reasons which are presented to assure us that an RNA vaccine could accomplish no such feat. Against the tides of current biological dogma, these researchers found that the genetic segments of this RNA virus are more than likely making their way into our genome. "I think we need to go over the immune system and how viruses and vaccines work.
Viruses work by infecting human cells, hijacking the cellular machinery to make copies of themselves, which then go on to infect more cells, etc. The cells themselves die as a result of this process.
Your immune system fights the virus by developing antibodies, but by that point the virus is already well on its way making these copies of itself. This is why people get symptoms; it's the immune response after the virus has invaded the body and started doing its damage.
In this process of the virus hijacking your cells, there is the possibility the virus could undergo reverse transcription and integrate itself into your nuclear DNA in one or more cells.
Conversely, the mRNA vaccines work by injecting short messenger RNA strands into your body, which similar to the virus, use existing cells to create copies of the spike protein used by the virus. The key difference is they aren't designed to replicate themselves, nor contain the enzymes to permit reverse transcription (thus not integrating themselves into your nuclear DNA in your cells). The mRNA strands are relatively short-lived; once a bunch of spike proteins have been created, your body generates antibodies to fight those.
Since the spike proteins don't replicate themselves, the pseudo-infection from the vaccine is relatively short-lived.
Meanwhile, your body having generated the antibodies via the vaccine, is now better equipped to provoke an immediate immune response against the virus, rather than waiting for your body to develop antibodies while the virus is replicating itself.
If you're worried about having your DNA altered, taking the vaccine is a much better way of preventing that than waiting to get infected by the actual virus.
In fact, pretty much anything you could be worried about from the vaccine (short of a jab in the arm and associated swelling) is going to be potentially worse from the virus itself.
"Specifically, a new study by MIT and Harvard scientists demonstrates that segments of the RNA from the coronavirus itself are most likely becoming a permanent fixture in human DNA. (study linked below). This was once thought near impossible, for the same reasons which are presented to assure us that an RNA vaccine could accomplish no such feat. Against the tides of current biological dogma, these researchers found that the genetic segments of this RNA virus are more than likely making their way into our genome. "
MIT & Harvard Study Suggests mRNA Vaccine Might Permanently Alter DNA After All
True.
Quoting 480,000 children getting it as one person did, means nothing - it’s like quoting how many get the cold virus - as COVID does not kill, or even badly affect healthy children - nor are infected children spreaders.
It’s the overreaction of immune system in the lungs that kills, by causing a “cytokine storm” resulting in severe inflammation that keeps air from entering the alveoli, and that happens the worst in the elderly - the immune systems of healthy children don’t have that overreaction problem.
They aren’t badly affected by it, and don’t spread it, and don’t need jabbed.
Thomson Reuters is most likely owned and conforms to the editorial agenda of its institutional investment firm overlords. And those who have bothered to look will know that the institutional investment in MSM, social media, and almost all of the Blue Chip corporations, is a vast network and pyramid consisting of a multitude of investment firms. And that vast pyramid ends at the top with Blackrock and Vanguard. Beyond Blackrock and Vanguard, the ownership is difficult to identify, but all that matters is that they can crash any stock price if the CEO doesn't do their bidding.Fact Check-Controversial MIT study does not show that mRNA vaccines alter DNA
The scientific statements in this paper may have been peer-reviewed, but the opinionated conclusion was not. For example, the paper makes the (correct) statement that almost 5000 deaths were reported in the VAERS by May, but the conclusion that this is a high number is not supported at all. 7,800 people die every day in the U.S. for all sorts of unrelated reasons. In 5 months (the time period of vaccines up until May), that comes to 1.17 million deaths from non-vaccine causes. It is not at all unreasonable that 5000 of those deaths just happened to be within 2 weeks of someone getting the vaccine. The authors relied upon a "first principles" confirmation of the significance of this number, which is another way of saying "hand-waving."Well, this is a bit awkward for the pro-vaxxers. I guess they'll claim that this paper was written by the wrong kind of experts and scientists. But unlike some of the publications on vaccine effectiveness, the authors of this paper don't have numerous statements in the 'competing interests' section.
Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19?
Now you are changing your tune. Why would I take something that can change my DNA, which you just admitted is possible?That blog post is woefully misleading. It's misrepresenting the study I linked, which talks about the virus, not the vaccine, integrating into human host nuclear DNA.
Fact Check-Controversial MIT study does not show that mRNA vaccines alter DNA
Worth noting is the author does later state: "To be fair, this study didn’t show that the RNA from the current vaccines is being integrated into our DNA", but that apparently didn't stop them from writing a completely incorrect and deliberately misleading headline.
Further reading that blog, they also appear to be arguing a strawman when they claim that people are being told that RNA sequences can't be integrated into DNA. I don't know anyone who actually claims that; certainly not biologists making that claim.
Rather, it's that the vaccine lacks the reverse transcription enzymes making it highly difficult (albeit not impossible) to integrate into human DNA. Then there is the aforementioned fact that the integration point is still going to be far lower in scope and risk with the vaccine versus the real virus, given the vaccine doesn't make copies of itself in the body. The mRNA strands have an extremely short longevity.
All of this adds up to the fact that you're still much greater at risk for integration of viral RNA into your DNA than you are from the vaccine.
Now you are changing your tune. Why would I take something that can change my DNA, which you just admitted is possible?
Especially when there's a very strong likelihood that if I get covid it will be a mild case that my immune system can handle? For all I know I might have already had it and had no real symptoms.
Thomson Reuters is most likely owned and conforms to the editorial agenda of its institutional investment firm overlords.