- Nov 13, 2017
- 12,212
- 12,526
- Country
- Romania
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
a false accusation
What false accusation?
Upvote
0
a false accusation
Re. the first link, I've never come across The Intelligencer before. I took your statement '...so many of the major American news networks' I assumed you meant the usual suspects, CNN, NYT, WAPO etc. If what you meant was some other little known news outlet, or if The Intellgencer is indeed a major news network, then mea culpa, apologies.
Re. your second article, that is the one I quoted from earlier:
'Psaki was asked repeatedly to comment on "photos of border agents on horseback using what appear to be whips on Haitian migrants" and whether it was appropriate behavior.
"I have seen some of the footage. I don't have the full context. I can't imagine what context would make that appropriate, but I don't have additional details," she told reporters at the daily White House briefing. "I don't think anyone seeing that footage would think it's acceptable or appropriate."
Homeland Security head Alejandro Mayorkas was asked about the photo earlier in the day while visiting Del Rio, Texas, where more than 15,000 mostly Haitian migrants have converged on a border bridge. He said the reporter who asked him about the whip was "assuming the facts," and suggested it was possible the agent was simply holding a long rein.'
What do you think? Does that seem unreasonable to you?
Really though - do you really think your statement is justified? If you could produce examples of 'many major American news networks' reporting on the use of whips on refugees then that would indeed justify the assertion that 'many major American news networks' did that. As it is, you appear to be doing everything you can to avoid the simple admission that your initial statement was incorrect, not supported by the evidence you have provided.
LOL I guess MSNBC and NBC examples you can see for yourself are just not going to satisfy you.
The truth is that this is typical fake news
LOL I guess MSNBC and NBC examples you can see for yourself are just not going to satisfy you.
The truth is that this is typical fake news, put out to push a narrative or racism at the border. The border is a disaster, Biden policies are promoting child trafficking, drug smuggling, and a super spreader event of COVID and other diseases. This is what journalists should be reporting on rather than follow the agenda of Democrats.
YesBut no
Obstruction of justice, sound familiarIt's like saying somebody died is all the evidence you need to prove murder.
Thanks for the link. That was an interesting article.Here is an interesting article explaining the weakness of this indictment. On the Special Counsel’s Weird Prosecution of Michael Sussmann
In addition, I did notice that the "proof" the Sussman was lying to the FBI was that he billed the Clinton campaign. Just as reasonable a conclusion from that is that he billed the Clinton campaign for the sake of having billable hours for doing a personal errand. Sleazy yes, but not the focus of Durham's investigation.
I thought it was interesting because it showed how weak the case was, which considering that Durham has been working for 2 years says a lot.Thanks for the link. That was an interesting article.
As to the plight of Sussman on whether he is found guilty or not. I don't personally care one way or another.
How do you know there was evidence there?
I think it is great that you don't have the current president and non right media claiming that this is a witch hunt and seeking to fire Durham.I thought it was interesting because it showed how weak the case was, which considering that Durham has been working for 2 years says a lot.
The FBI told Secretary Clinton they wanted her to turn over all work-related emails on her server. That's what she did. The FBI can't just go on a fishing expedition through her personal emails.The emails were evidence. Whether or not they showed there was a crime or something else we will never know. Because she destroyed them.
When you know the law is after you and wants your emails, texts etc and you destroy them so they can't get them what is that? I fully expect you to make excuses but it's obvious to those who know these things what was going on.
Please find me the statute that refers to collusion.
When Michael Cohen and Roger Stone got their computers and documents seized they had a group of people going over all this stuff and removing the things not related to the case.The FBI told Secretary Clinton they wanted her to turn over all work-related emails on her server. That's what she did. The FBI can't just go on a fishing expedition through her personal emails.
Oh it wasn't a stupid point at all. Trump wasn't charged with a charge that doesn't exist and he can't be charged with.I'm not going to banter with you about the word in this case. You think you have made some stupid point. You know good a well that the word is just a general word used to describe, cooperating or collaborating or whatever and in this case it's with the Russians to influence the election.
1) Russia clearly influenced the election.The truth is NOTHING was found to show Trump or his team did any such thing. End of story.
"I know you are but what am I" with no evidence. Not exactly a damning argument.The only person who actually did that was Hillary and her team.